Search: penalty u/s 271

7 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 10(26)(AAA)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi76 Mumbai9 Indore8 Bangalore8 Chandigarh7 Kolkata7 Agra6 Hyderabad2 Pune2 Surat2 Ahmedabad1 SC1 Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 271A13 Section 10(26)(AAA)12 Section 139(1)8 Section 132(4)8 Penalty7 Section 153A6 Addition to Income6 Section 271(1)(c)4 Section 1484

D.C.I.T CC - V,KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. KRISHNA TRADE & COMMERCE PVT LTD, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1083/KOL/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 Apr 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 271A

26, 2016 Date of pronouncing the order : April 29, 2016 O R D E R Per Shri P.M. Jagtap :- This appeal is preferred by the Revenue against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Central-1, Kolkata dated 04.02.2013, whereby he cancelled the penalty of Rs.17,50,000/- imposed by the Assessing Officer under section 271AAA

UTPAL DORJEE YONGDA,PELLING, WEST SIKKIM vs. A.O., NFAC / D.C.I.T., WARD - 3(1), GANGTOK, GANGTOK

In the result, all the four appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

D.C.I.T CC - V,KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. KRISHNA TRADE & COMMERCE PVT LTD, KOLKATA

UTPAL DORJEE YONGDA,PELLING, WEST SIKKIM vs. A.O., NFAC / D.C.I.T., WARD - 3(1), GANGTOK, GANGTOK

D.C.I.T CC - V,KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. KRISHNA TRADE & COMMERCE PVT LTD, KOLKATA

UTPAL DORJEE YONGDA,PELLING, WEST SIKKIM vs. A.O., NFAC / D.C.I.T., WARD - 3(1), GANGTOK, GANGTOK

UTPAL DORJEE YONGDA,PELLING, WEST SIKKIM vs. A.O., NFAC / D.C.I.T., WARD - 3(1), GANGTOK, GANGTOK

UTPAL DORJEE YONGDA,PELLING, WEST SIKKIM vs. A.O., NFAC / D.C.I.T., WARD - 3(1), GANGTOK, GANGTOK

UTPAL DORJEE YONGDA,PELLING, WEST SIKKIM vs. A.O., NFAC/ D.C.I.T., CIRCLE - 3(2), GANGTOK, GANGTOK

D.C.I.T CC - V,KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. SALSAR STOCK BROKING LTD, KOLKATA

SRI MAYANK DAGA,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CC-XI, KOLKTA, KOLKATA