Search: penalty u/s 271

4 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 10(26)(AAA)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 10(26)(AAA)12 Section 139(1)8 Section 271(1)(c)4 Section 1484 Section 1444 Section 69A4 Cash Deposit4 Penalty4 Addition to Income4

UTPAL DORJEE YONGDA,PELLING, WEST SIKKIM vs. A.O., NFAC / D.C.I.T., WARD - 3(1), GANGTOK, GANGTOK

In the result, all the four appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1347/KOL/2024[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Sept 2024AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 10(26)(AAA)Section 139(1)Section 144Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 69A

penalty imposed by the ld. Assessing Officer u/s 271(1)(c) vide his order dated 13th September, 2022 passed in both these assessment years. These orders have been upheld by the ld. CIT(Appeals) vide his orders dated 23.04.2024 and 24.04.2024 passed in A.Ys. 2014- 15 and 2015-16 respectively. 3. We take quantum appeals first. The grounds of appeal

UTPAL DORJEE YONGDA,PELLING, WEST SIKKIM vs. A.O., NFAC / D.C.I.T., WARD - 3(1), GANGTOK, GANGTOK

UTPAL DORJEE YONGDA,PELLING, WEST SIKKIM vs. A.O., NFAC / D.C.I.T., WARD - 3(1), GANGTOK, GANGTOK

UTPAL DORJEE YONGDA,PELLING, WEST SIKKIM vs. A.O., NFAC / D.C.I.T., WARD - 3(1), GANGTOK, GANGTOK

UTPAL DORJEE YONGDA,PELLING, WEST SIKKIM vs. A.O., NFAC / D.C.I.T., WARD - 3(1), GANGTOK, GANGTOK

UTPAL DORJEE YONGDA,PELLING, WEST SIKKIM vs. A.O., NFAC/ D.C.I.T., CIRCLE - 3(2), GANGTOK, GANGTOK