BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “house property”+ Section 292Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Bangalore41Mumbai32Delhi29Amritsar27Chandigarh18Jaipur13Nagpur11Lucknow9Hyderabad6Patna5Chennai3Kolkata3Ahmedabad2Pune2Jodhpur1Jabalpur1Allahabad1Surat1Karnataka1

Key Topics

Section 14815Section 143(2)9Section 292B7Section 245C(1)4Section 143(3)3Section 1473Reassessment3Section 245F2Section 1442Reopening of Assessment

DCIT, CC-4(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S MANI SQUARE LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1052/KOL/2015[2006-2007]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Nov 2017AY 2006-2007

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am]

Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 245C(1)Section 245FSection 292BSection 68Section 69

Properties Pvt. Ltd., the proceedings u/s. 147 are not in respect of your company i.e. M/s. Mani Square. Hence, the fact that M/s. Mani Square Ltd. is before the Hon’ble Settlement Commission for that assessment year is not relevant as the proceedings are different.” 8. From a reading of the aforesaid letter it is discernible that the AO admitted

2

DCIT,CC-4(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S MANI SQUARE LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1053/KOL/2015[2006-2007]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Nov 2017AY 2006-2007

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am]

Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 245C(1)Section 245FSection 292BSection 68Section 69

Properties Pvt. Ltd., the proceedings u/s. 147 are not in respect of your company i.e. M/s. Mani Square. Hence, the fact that M/s. Mani Square Ltd. is before the Hon’ble Settlement Commission for that assessment year is not relevant as the proceedings are different.” 8. From a reading of the aforesaid letter it is discernible that the AO admitted

LALJI & SONS,BANKURA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE - BANKURA, BANKURA

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed

ITA 220/KOL/2016[2003-2004]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata25 Jan 2018AY 2003-2004

Bench: : Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi

For Appellant: Shri D.K. Sen, Advocate, ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Arindam Bhattacharjee, Addl, CIT, ld.DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 292B

house property & capital gains. The assessee filed its return on 22-09-03 showing a total income of Rs.1,96,808/-. Accordingly, the said return was processed by raising a demand of Rs.206/-. Subsequently, on an information regarding declaration of less value of the property by issuing a notice u/s. 148 of the Act, the AO reopened the original assessment