MAITHAN CERAMIC LTD.,,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 7(1),, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

274\nPA No. AACCM 0476B\nNidhi Agro Pvt Ltd\n02.07.2010\n10,000,000\nRTGS\nNo\n10,673,150\n10,000,00\n6B, Bentinck Street, Aloka House\n31.03.2011\n747,945\n74,795\n10,673,15\nKolkata - 700 001\nPANAACN 8759L\nR.A.Trading Pvt Ltd\n12.08.2010\n4,000,000\nRTGS\nNo\n10,570,575\n4,000,00\n1.R.N.Mkukherjee, 5th Floor\n13.08.2010

M/S VISA INTERNATIONAL LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE11(2), KOLKATA

In the result, appeals for AYs 2005-06 and 2007-08 are partly allowed and appeal for AY 2006-07 is dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Girish Agrawal

House, Alipore, Kolkata- Kolkata. 700027. (PAN: AAACV8649P) (Appellant) (Respondent) Present for: Appellant by : N o n e Respondent by : Shri P. P. Barman, Addl. CIT Date of Hearing : 13.03.2023 Date of Pronouncement : 28.03.2023 O R D E R PER BENCH: All these captioned appeals filed by the assessee are against the separate orders of Ld. CIT(A)-20, Kolkata vide

M/S VISA INTERNATIONAL LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE11(2), KOLKATA

In the result, appeals for AYs 2005-06 and 2007-08 are partly allowed and appeal for AY 2006-07 is dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Girish Agrawal

House, Alipore, Kolkata- Kolkata. 700027. (PAN: AAACV8649P) (Appellant) (Respondent) Present for: Appellant by : N o n e Respondent by : Shri P. P. Barman, Addl. CIT Date of Hearing : 13.03.2023 Date of Pronouncement : 28.03.2023 O R D E R PER BENCH: All these captioned appeals filed by the assessee are against the separate orders of Ld. CIT(A)-20, Kolkata vide

M/S VISA INTERNATIONAL LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE11(2), KOLKATA

In the result, appeals for AYs 2005-06 and 2007-08 are partly allowed and appeal for AY 2006-07 is dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Girish Agrawal

House, Alipore, Kolkata- Kolkata. 700027. (PAN: AAACV8649P) (Appellant) (Respondent) Present for: Appellant by : N o n e Respondent by : Shri P. P. Barman, Addl. CIT Date of Hearing : 13.03.2023 Date of Pronouncement : 28.03.2023 O R D E R PER BENCH: All these captioned appeals filed by the assessee are against the separate orders of Ld. CIT(A)-20, Kolkata vide

OUTOTEC(FINLAND) OY (NOW MERGED WITH "METSO MINERALS OY" AND THE MERGED ENTITY HAS BEEN RENAMED TO METSO OUTOTEC FINLAND OY),GURUGRAM vs. DCIT(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), CIRCLE-2(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result,both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Girish Agrawal

section 144C of the Act dated 10.01.2022 wherein it noted that identical issue on taxability of income from testing and other services was considered by the DRP in assessee’s own case for AY 2016-17 as under:- “5.1 The above issue was discussed in details by the DRP in AY 2016-17. The facts of the case

OUTOTEC (FINLAND) OY (NOW MERGED WITH "METSO MINERALS OY" AND THE MERGED ENTITY HAS BEEN RENAMED TO METSO OUTOTEC FINLAND OY),HARYANA vs. ACIT(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), CIRCLE-2(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result,both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Girish Agrawal

section 144C of the Act dated 10.01.2022 wherein it noted that identical issue on taxability of income from testing and other services was considered by the DRP in assessee’s own case for AY 2016-17 as under:- “5.1 The above issue was discussed in details by the DRP in AY 2016-17. The facts of the case

SIMOCO SYSTEMS AND INFRASTRUCTURE SOLUTIONS LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. ITO WARD 2 (1), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishraassessment Year: 2018-19

housing during the previous year 2017-18. The company had e-filed its return of income for AY 2018-19 on 26/09/2018 declaring total income at Rs.NIL. The assessee had shown deemed total income u/s 115JB of the Act at Rs.69,07,501/-. The return was revised on 12/10/2018 showing the same total income as well as the income

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-11(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. SOUTH CITY PROJECTS (KOLKATA) LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar&Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey]

properties Pvt. Ltd. [“AAIPL”]. 3. Facts in brief are that, the assessee is a company engaged in the business of Real Estate Development and maintenance service of commercial area let out to various tenants. The assessee had filed return of income during the year declaring total income of Rs. 46,89,36,410/-. The case of the assessee was selected