MURARILAL MURARKA,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD-61(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed
ITA 636/KOL/2022[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 May 2025AY 2014-2015
Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 40Section 44A
house property and business or profession. The case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny through CASS, the reasons being large commission expenses and low net profit and low net profit or less shown from large gross receipt. Accordingly, statutory notices u/s 143(2) and 142(1) of the Act were issued and duly served upon the assessee which were
