BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “house property”+ Section 142A(6)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chandigarh41Delhi32Agra14Jaipur13Indore10Raipur9Bangalore8Mumbai7Hyderabad7Kolkata6Lucknow5Pune4Varanasi3Chennai3Ahmedabad2Nagpur1Jodhpur1Cochin1SC1Surat1

Key Topics

Section 14712Section 2638Section 143(3)7Addition to Income5Section 1484Section 142A4Section 684House Property4Cash Deposit4

SUSHIL MITRUKA,SILIGURI vs. P.C.I.T., SILIGURI

In the result, appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 487/KOL/2025[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Jul 2025AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am& Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm]

Section 142ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 263Section 68

6 Sushil Mitruka ITA Nos. 487 to 490/Kol/2025 AYs 2014-15 to 2016-17 & 2018-19 10. After hearing the rival contentions and perusing the material available on record, we find that in this case, the assessee has constructed the house property over a period of time commencing from FY 2014-15 to 2015-16 and year wise expenses were

SUSHIL MITRUKA,SILIGURI vs. P.C.I.T., SILIGURI

Revision u/s 2634
Section 2502
Section 56(2)(viib)2

In the result, appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 488/KOL/2025[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Jul 2025AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am& Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm]

Section 142ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 263Section 68

6 Sushil Mitruka ITA Nos. 487 to 490/Kol/2025 AYs 2014-15 to 2016-17 & 2018-19 10. After hearing the rival contentions and perusing the material available on record, we find that in this case, the assessee has constructed the house property over a period of time commencing from FY 2014-15 to 2015-16 and year wise expenses were

SUSHIL MITRUKA,SILIGURI vs. P.C.I.T., SILIGURI

In the result, appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 489/KOL/2025[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Jul 2025AY 2016-2017

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am& Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm]

Section 142ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 263Section 68

6 Sushil Mitruka ITA Nos. 487 to 490/Kol/2025 AYs 2014-15 to 2016-17 & 2018-19 10. After hearing the rival contentions and perusing the material available on record, we find that in this case, the assessee has constructed the house property over a period of time commencing from FY 2014-15 to 2015-16 and year wise expenses were

SUSHIL MITRUKA,SILIGURI vs. P.C.I.T., SILIGURI

In the result, appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 490/KOL/2025[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Jul 2025AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am& Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm]

Section 142ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 263Section 68

6 Sushil Mitruka ITA Nos. 487 to 490/Kol/2025 AYs 2014-15 to 2016-17 & 2018-19 10. After hearing the rival contentions and perusing the material available on record, we find that in this case, the assessee has constructed the house property over a period of time commencing from FY 2014-15 to 2015-16 and year wise expenses were

MANICK CHANDRA PAUL,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 8(1), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 614/KOL/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Jul 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishraassessment Year: 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri S. K. Tulsiyan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Chandan Das, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 2(47)Section 250Section 55ASection 80

142A of the Act before finally computing the capital gains/loss in the hands of the assessee and the Ld. CIT(A) has illogically upheld such unlawful action of the AO on the sole allegation that the valuer visited the property after the assessee sold the same. 4. That, without any prejudice to the above, the Ld. CIT(A) erred

ITO, WARD - 11(3), , KOLKATA vs. M/S. LNB RENEWABLE ENERGY PVT. LTD., , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed

ITA 2011/KOL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata30 Nov 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Sri Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 56(2)Section 56(2)(viib)

142A of the Act. On 28.03.2016 the case was referred to the District Valuation Officer, but on 30.03.2016 reply was received from the Asst. Valuation Officer-6, Kolkata stating that the Valuation Officer deals only with immovable property and has not dealt with the valuation of shares, debenture, jewellery, vehicle, machinery and plant. On the same day i.e 30/3/2016