JAGANNATH GUPTA FAMILY TRUST,KOLKATA vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTIONS), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

Bench: : Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri Dr. A.L. Saini

AA(3) of the Income-tax Act 1961 hereinafter the Act cancelling the registration granted u/s. 12AA of the Act w.e.f 01-04-2008. 2. Initially the assessee has raised as many as nine grounds of appeal. Subsequently, the assessee filed such grounds of appeal in concise form, which M/s.Jagannath Gupta Family Trust 1 are placed at page

CREATIVE MUSEUM DESIGNERS, KOLKATA vs. ITO(EXEMPTIONS), WARD - 1(1), KOLKATA , KOLKATA

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri P. M. Jagtap, Hon’Ble Vice-(Kz) & Smt. Madhumita Roy, Hon’Ble Jm आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.1147 & 1148/Kol/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years:2013-14 & 2014-15)

1,06,30,400/-as sale of services. It was further found that different organizations had deducted tax at source under Section 194J of the Act while making payment to the assessee. Further that, the assessee had booked amount received from RBI in its revenue. Upon further examination of the matters, it was found that the assessee decided

CREATIVE MUSEUM DESIGNERS, KOLKATA vs. ITO(EXEMPTIONS), WARD - 1(1), KOLKATA , KOLKATA

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri P. M. Jagtap, Hon’Ble Vice-(Kz) & Smt. Madhumita Roy, Hon’Ble Jm आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.1147 & 1148/Kol/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years:2013-14 & 2014-15)

1,06,30,400/-as sale of services. It was further found that different organizations had deducted tax at source under Section 194J of the Act while making payment to the assessee. Further that, the assessee had booked amount received from RBI in its revenue. Upon further examination of the matters, it was found that the assessee decided

CREATIVE MUSEUM DESIGNERS, KOLKATA vs. ITO(EXEMPTIONS), WARD - 1(1), KOLKATA , KOLKATA

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri P. M. Jagtap, Hon’Ble Vice-(Kz) & Smt. Madhumita Roy, Hon’Ble Jm आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.1147 & 1148/Kol/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years:2013-14 & 2014-15)

1,06,30,400/-as sale of services. It was further found that different organizations had deducted tax at source under Section 194J of the Act while making payment to the assessee. Further that, the assessee had booked amount received from RBI in its revenue. Upon further examination of the matters, it was found that the assessee decided