M/S BENGAL SHRISTI INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT LIMITED,DURGAPUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2, DURGAPUR, DURGAPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed in part

Properties [2012] 206 Taxman 584/19 taxmann.com 316, which was decided by the Bombay High Court on similar lines as in the assessee's case before us. 15. In the light of the above reasoning, we have no hesitation in allowing the cases filed by the assessee in respect of assessment years

M/S. KALYAN EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,BUDBUD, BURDWAN (EAST) vs. A.C.I.T., CIRCLE - 2, DURGAPUR, DURGAPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarmai.T.A. No. 106/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2020-2021 M/S. Kalyan Educational Society,..............Appellant Budbud Bye Pass (North), Distg. Bardhaman-713403 [Pan: Aabtk2860K] -Vs.- Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,....Respondent Circle-2, Durgapur, Aayakar Bhawan, Durgapur, West Bengal Appearances By: Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate, Smt. Puja Somani, C.A., Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri Subhrajyoti Bhattacharjee, Cit (Dr), Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue

property has to be computed oncommercial principles by virtue of Circular No. 5-P(LXX-6) of 1968, dated 19-6-1968. (5) That on the facts and circumstances of the case, the delayin filing the return of income and Form 10B was due to firebreakout in the office of the society where records werekept and outbreak of the pandemic

RP SANJIV GOENKA GROUP CSR TRUST,KOLKATA vs. CIT, (EXEMPTIONS), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

property held for charitable or religious purposes and income of Trusts or Institutions from contributions are exempt from tax provided such Trusts or Institutions are registered u/s 12A of the Act. The procedure for registration u/s 12A is prescribed in section 12AA of the Act which provides that the Commissioner, on the receipt of an application for registration

JAGANNATH GUPTA FAMILY TRUST,KOLKATA vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTIONS), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

Bench: : Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri Dr. A.L. Saini

property held under trust wholly for charitable or religious purposes and the provisions of that section and section 13 shall apply accordingly. 41. The provision thus, emphasizes upon the income of the trust created wholly for charitable or religious purposes or an institution established wholly for such purposes and so is the case in sub-section (2) of the aforesaid

GOLDEN SAND TRUST,KOLKATA vs. CIT(EXEMPTIONS), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Am]

properties held in trust was always applied for charitable purpose. Drawing attention to the annual accounts of the Trust for FY 2011-12 the Ld. AR submitted that during the relevant year assessee received corpus donation of Rs.1062 lacs and earned interest income of Rs.59.59 lacs. There against the amount applied for charity in the form of donations paid

CREATIVE MUSEUM DESIGNERS, KOLKATA vs. ITO(EXEMPTIONS), WARD - 1(1), KOLKATA , KOLKATA

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri P. M. Jagtap, Hon’Ble Vice-(Kz) & Smt. Madhumita Roy, Hon’Ble Jm आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.1147 & 1148/Kol/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years:2013-14 & 2014-15)

House Street in terms of an agreement entered into by and between the assessee and the Reserve Bank of India (in short ‘RBI’). In fact the assessee becomes the successful bidder in an open tender process floated by RBI for setting up the said museum project on turnkey basis and hence awarded with the said contract for executing the work

CREATIVE MUSEUM DESIGNERS, KOLKATA vs. ITO(EXEMPTIONS), WARD - 1(1), KOLKATA , KOLKATA

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri P. M. Jagtap, Hon’Ble Vice-(Kz) & Smt. Madhumita Roy, Hon’Ble Jm आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.1147 & 1148/Kol/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years:2013-14 & 2014-15)

House Street in terms of an agreement entered into by and between the assessee and the Reserve Bank of India (in short ‘RBI’). In fact the assessee becomes the successful bidder in an open tender process floated by RBI for setting up the said museum project on turnkey basis and hence awarded with the said contract for executing the work

CREATIVE MUSEUM DESIGNERS, KOLKATA vs. ITO(EXEMPTIONS), WARD - 1(1), KOLKATA , KOLKATA

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri P. M. Jagtap, Hon’Ble Vice-(Kz) & Smt. Madhumita Roy, Hon’Ble Jm आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.1147 & 1148/Kol/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years:2013-14 & 2014-15)

House Street in terms of an agreement entered into by and between the assessee and the Reserve Bank of India (in short ‘RBI’). In fact the assessee becomes the successful bidder in an open tender process floated by RBI for setting up the said museum project on turnkey basis and hence awarded with the said contract for executing the work

PANCHI BIBI WAKF ESTATE,KOLKATA vs. DDIT (E)-II, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Waseem Ahmed

12A of the Act. The assessee has declared income from the guest house which was managed in the name & style of Victoria Guest House. We find that during the assessment proceedings, AO found that assessee is running a business activity of the guest house but not maintaining separate books of account as required u/s 11(4A) of the Act. Therefore

M/S ADHUNIK INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. JCIT, RG-10, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri A.T.Varkey, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am ] I.T.A No.1281 /Kol/2015 Assessment Year : 2010-11

12A) Nothing contained in sub-section (12) shall apply to any enterprise or undertaking which is transferred in a scheme of amalgamation or demerger on or after the 1st day of April, 2007.] 78 [(13) Nothing contained in this section shall apply to any Special Economic Zones notified on or after the 1st day of April, 2005 in accordance with

I.T.O(E)-II, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. FUTURE EDUCATION RESCARCH TRUST., KOLKATA

In the result, assessee’s CO is dismissed as infructuous

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi & C.O.No.69/Kol/2013 (A/O Ita No.1031/Kol/2013) Assessment Year:2009-10

section 11 of the Act just on the basis of loan provided to the wife of the trustee without checking the utilization of the loan given by the assessee. The assessee before the ld. CIT(A) on merits submitted as under : a) The advance was given to Dr. M Ghosh to buy property at Alipore, Kolkata on behalf of trust

ITO(E), WD-1(3),KOLKATA,KOLKATA vs. SRI AUROBINDO INSTITUTE OF CULTURE, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

12A of the Income Tax Act. It has filed return of income declaring total income at Rs. Nil by claiming exemption under section 11 of the Income Tax Act. In the assessment order, the A.O. has disallowed the exemption amount of Rs. 32,68,920/- claimed by the assessee for the reason that the cost of concerned fixed assets

TARAKESWAR VIVEKANANDA PALLY SEVA KENDRA,HOOGHLY vs. ITO, WARD-24(3), HOOGHLY, KOLKATA

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri J.Sudhakar Reddy, Am] Assessment Year : 2010-11

12A, as the Commissioner thought it fit to refuse to condone the long delay caused by the assessee in applying for the registration. Therefore, the Assessing Officer had no other option but to complete the assessments in the status of AOP also closing his eyes towards Section 11 and Section 13. To that extent, the Assessing Officer was right

JAN PRIYA TRUST ,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O.(EXEMPTION)-1(1), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed as indicated above

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap(Kz) &Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm] Assessment Year: 2012-13 Jan Priya Trust Vs. Income-Tax Officer (Exemption), Ward- (Pan: Aaatj0335M) 1(1), Kolkata.

12A of the Act and that the AO without assigning any reason has disallowed Rs.2,18,020/-, which was claimed by the assessee as Administrative & Establishment expenses which was included in the application of income u/s. 11 of the Act. We note that the issue as to whether the administrative and establishment expenses can be included as application of Fund

PS MAGNUM,KOLKATA vs. A.C.I.T.,CIRCLE-29, KOLKATA

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Manish Boradi.T.A. No. 261/Kol/2020 Assessment Year: 2013-2014 Tarasafe International Private Limited,......................Appellant C/O. Dutta Properties, Budge Budge Trunk Road, Gobindpur, Kolkata-700141 [Pan:Aadct0645E] -Vs.- Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax,.........................Respondent Circle-15(2), Kolkata, Aayakar Bhawan Poorva, 110, Shantipally, Kolkata-700107

Properties, Budge Budge Trunk Road, Gobindpur, Kolkata-700141 [PAN:AADCT0645E] -Vs.- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,.........................Respondent Circle-15(2), Kolkata, Aayakar Bhawan Poorva, 110, Shantipally, Kolkata-700107 Appearances by: Shri S.M. Surana, Advocate/Shri Sunil Surana, C.A., appeared on behalf of the assessee Shri Arup Chatterjee, Sr. DR appeared on behalf of the Revenue Date of concluding the hearing

M/S COALSALE CO.,KOLKATA vs. A.C.I.T.,CIRCLE-34, KOLKATA

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Manish Boradi.T.A. No. 261/Kol/2020 Assessment Year: 2013-2014 Tarasafe International Private Limited,......................Appellant C/O. Dutta Properties, Budge Budge Trunk Road, Gobindpur, Kolkata-700141 [Pan:Aadct0645E] -Vs.- Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax,.........................Respondent Circle-15(2), Kolkata, Aayakar Bhawan Poorva, 110, Shantipally, Kolkata-700107

Properties, Budge Budge Trunk Road, Gobindpur, Kolkata-700141 [PAN:AADCT0645E] -Vs.- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,.........................Respondent Circle-15(2), Kolkata, Aayakar Bhawan Poorva, 110, Shantipally, Kolkata-700107 Appearances by: Shri S.M. Surana, Advocate/Shri Sunil Surana, C.A., appeared on behalf of the assessee Shri Arup Chatterjee, Sr. DR appeared on behalf of the Revenue Date of concluding the hearing

TARASAFE INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED ,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T.,CIRCLE-15(2), KOLKATA

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Manish Boradi.T.A. No. 261/Kol/2020 Assessment Year: 2013-2014 Tarasafe International Private Limited,......................Appellant C/O. Dutta Properties, Budge Budge Trunk Road, Gobindpur, Kolkata-700141 [Pan:Aadct0645E] -Vs.- Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax,.........................Respondent Circle-15(2), Kolkata, Aayakar Bhawan Poorva, 110, Shantipally, Kolkata-700107

Properties, Budge Budge Trunk Road, Gobindpur, Kolkata-700141 [PAN:AADCT0645E] -Vs.- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,.........................Respondent Circle-15(2), Kolkata, Aayakar Bhawan Poorva, 110, Shantipally, Kolkata-700107 Appearances by: Shri S.M. Surana, Advocate/Shri Sunil Surana, C.A., appeared on behalf of the assessee Shri Arup Chatterjee, Sr. DR appeared on behalf of the Revenue Date of concluding the hearing

ABHILASH TRADECOM PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD-3(2), KOLKATA

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Manish Boradi.T.A. No. 261/Kol/2020 Assessment Year: 2013-2014 Tarasafe International Private Limited,......................Appellant C/O. Dutta Properties, Budge Budge Trunk Road, Gobindpur, Kolkata-700141 [Pan:Aadct0645E] -Vs.- Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax,.........................Respondent Circle-15(2), Kolkata, Aayakar Bhawan Poorva, 110, Shantipally, Kolkata-700107

Properties, Budge Budge Trunk Road, Gobindpur, Kolkata-700141 [PAN:AADCT0645E] -Vs.- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,.........................Respondent Circle-15(2), Kolkata, Aayakar Bhawan Poorva, 110, Shantipally, Kolkata-700107 Appearances by: Shri S.M. Surana, Advocate/Shri Sunil Surana, C.A., appeared on behalf of the assessee Shri Arup Chatterjee, Sr. DR appeared on behalf of the Revenue Date of concluding the hearing