BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

10 results for “house property”+ Section 11Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai20Delhi16Lucknow11Kolkata10Bangalore10Telangana6SC5Karnataka5Chennai4Jaipur3Hyderabad2Ahmedabad2Calcutta2Jodhpur1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Chandigarh1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 80H12Section 8010Section 80I10Deduction9Section 143(3)8Section 248Disallowance8House Property5Section 54F4Depreciation

ACIT, CIRCLE-32, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. MRS. ISHITA MOHATTA, KOLKATA

In the result the Cross Objection, No

ITA 788/KOL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 Nov 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Acit, Cir-32, Kolkata Vs. Mrs. Ishita Mohatta 10B, Middleton Row, 3Rd Floor, Kolkata – 24, Park Street, Magma House, 9Th Floor, Kolkata – 700 071. 700 016. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Ajfpk 3943 P (अपीलाथ" /Assessee) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. & Co No.45/Kol/2018 (Assessment Year: 2013-14) Vs. Acit, Cir-32, Kolkata Mrs. Ishita Mohatta 24, Park Street, Magma House, 9Th 10B, Middleton Row, 3Rd Floor, Floor, Kolkata – 700 016. Kolkata – 700 071. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Ajfpk 3943 P (अपीलाथ" /Assessee) (""यथ" / Respondent) ..

For Appellant: Shri Kapil Mondal, JCIT, Sr. DRFor Respondent: Shri S. Jhajharia, AR
Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 54F

11A was utilized by the assessee for purchasing the new house for a sum of Rs. 21,10,500/-, therefore, the exemption u/s 54F was allowable for a sum of Rs. 20,79,938/- (21,10,500 × 46,73,582 ÷ 47,42,255) and taxable Long Term Capital Gains worked

4
Set Off of Losses4
Addition to Income4

A.C.I.T CIR - 30,KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S TAPASYA ENTERPRISES, KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 2098/KOL/2013[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Oct 2017AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Aby.T Varkey & Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 143(3)Section 24

11A, Palm Avenue, Kolkata-68 Kolkatda-19 [PAN No.AADFT 1366 M] .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent None आवेदक क" ओर से/By Assessee Shri Saurabh Kumar, Addl. CIT-DR राज"व क" ओर से/By Respondent 05-10-2017 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing 13-10-2017 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement आदेश

A.C.I.T CIR - 30,KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S TAPASYA ENTERPRISES, KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 2097/KOL/2013[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Oct 2017AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Aby.T Varkey & Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 143(3)Section 24

11A, Palm Avenue, Kolkata-68 Kolkatda-19 [PAN No.AADFT 1366 M] .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent None आवेदक क" ओर से/By Assessee Shri Saurabh Kumar, Addl. CIT-DR राज"व क" ओर से/By Respondent 05-10-2017 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing 13-10-2017 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement आदेश

A.C.I.T CIR - 30,KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S TAPASYA ENTERPRISES, KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 2100/KOL/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Oct 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Aby.T Varkey & Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 143(3)Section 24

11A, Palm Avenue, Kolkata-68 Kolkatda-19 [PAN No.AADFT 1366 M] .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent None आवेदक क" ओर से/By Assessee Shri Saurabh Kumar, Addl. CIT-DR राज"व क" ओर से/By Respondent 05-10-2017 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing 13-10-2017 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement आदेश

A.C.I.T CIR - 30,KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S TAPASYA ENTERPRISES, KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 2099/KOL/2013[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Oct 2017AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Aby.T Varkey & Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 143(3)Section 24

11A, Palm Avenue, Kolkata-68 Kolkatda-19 [PAN No.AADFT 1366 M] .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent None आवेदक क" ओर से/By Assessee Shri Saurabh Kumar, Addl. CIT-DR राज"व क" ओर से/By Respondent 05-10-2017 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing 13-10-2017 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement आदेश

RAJIB CHAKRABORTY,KOLKATA vs. ITO- WARD-30(3), KOLKATA. , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1279/KOL/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 May 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 250(6)Section 253(3)Section 253(5)

house within the period stipulated in Section 54F(1), if the assessee wants the benefit of Section 54F, then he should deposit the said capital gains in an account which is duly notified by the Central Government. In other words if he want of claim exemption from payment of income tax by retaining the cash, then the said amount

DCIT, CIR-11, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S GRAPHITE INDIA LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, assessee’s appeal is partly allowed

ITA 559/KOL/2008[2003-2004]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata24 Aug 2016AY 2003-2004

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi

Section 154Section 80Section 80HSection 80I

Property and other sources. Thereafter the case was selected for scrutiny assessment and accordingly notice u/s 143(2) was issue to initiate the proceedings u/s 143(3). The assessment u/s 143(3) was completed on 28.02.2006 by determining total income at Rs.26,16,24,330/- by making certain addition and disallowance. The assessee, for the year under consideration also claimed

GRAPHITE INDIA LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, R-11, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, assessee’s appeal is partly allowed

ITA 304/KOL/2008[2003-2004]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata24 Aug 2016AY 2003-2004

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi

Section 154Section 80Section 80HSection 80I

Property and other sources. Thereafter the case was selected for scrutiny assessment and accordingly notice u/s 143(2) was issue to initiate the proceedings u/s 143(3). The assessment u/s 143(3) was completed on 28.02.2006 by determining total income at Rs.26,16,24,330/- by making certain addition and disallowance. The assessee, for the year under consideration also claimed

GRAPHITE INDIA LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, R-11, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, assessee’s appeal is partly allowed

ITA 305/KOL/2008[2003-2004]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata24 Aug 2016AY 2003-2004

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi

Section 154Section 80Section 80HSection 80I

Property and other sources. Thereafter the case was selected for scrutiny assessment and accordingly notice u/s 143(2) was issue to initiate the proceedings u/s 143(3). The assessment u/s 143(3) was completed on 28.02.2006 by determining total income at Rs.26,16,24,330/- by making certain addition and disallowance. The assessee, for the year under consideration also claimed

DCIT, CIRCLE - 2, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. LMJ LOGISTICS LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal stands partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 1800/KOL/2010[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Jun 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri N.V.Vasudevan & Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year :2007-08

Section 143(3)Section 80Section 80BSection 80I

house No. 13 was issued on 12.03.2007. iv) The part of warehouse was given on rent since long time to M/s Rishi Shipping Ltd. which was filled with the DAP (fertilizer) ITA No.1800/Kol/2010 A.Y. 2007-08 DCIT Cir-2, Kol. Vs. M/s LMJ Logistics Ltd. Page 3 In view of the above, the AO sought clarification by issuing a notice