BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “house property”+ Section 115Oclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai23Kolkata7Chennai3Delhi3Ahmedabad1

Key Topics

Section 92C5Section 143(3)4Addition to Income4Transfer Pricing3Depreciation3Section 144C(5)2Section 144C2Section 732Section 14A2

M/S IFGL REFRACTORIES LTD.,KOLKATA vs. A.C.I.T.,(OSD)-WARD-6(2), KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed in part

ITA 684/KOL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata17 Feb 2021AY 2012-13
Section 250Section 92BSection 92C

House 3, Netaji Subhas Road Kolkata – 700 001 [PAN : AABCI 7391 C] Vs. Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax (OSD), Ward-6(2) Kolkata…............……..…....Respondent Appearances by: Shri Ravi Tulsiyan, FCA, appeared on behalf of the assessee. Shri Sanjay Paul, Addl. CIT, D/R, appearing on behalf of the Revenue. Date of concluding the hearing : November 19th, 2020 Date of pronouncing

MISRILALL MINES PVT LTD,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T CC - XI,KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, assessee’s appeal is partly allowed

ITA 643/KOL/2013[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata
08 Feb 2017
AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri A.T.Varkey & Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 115OSection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 73

115O of Income Tax Act, 1961. 3. That the conclusion arrived at by the Ld. CIT(A) in the impugned order is based on wholly misconceived notion of facts, and on irrelevant considerations and misplaced case law and, therefore, the said order under appeal is bad in law and perverse.” 4. Facts in brief are that assessee in the present

DCIT, CIRCLE-4(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S VISHNU TEA & INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed in part

ITA 1749/KOL/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata30 Nov 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy, Hon’Ble Am & Sri Aby T. Varkey, Hon’Ble Jm] I.T.A. No. 1749/Kol/2016 Assessment Year: 2008-09 C.O. No. 64/Kol/2016 A/O. I.T.A. No. 1749/Kol/2016 Assessment Year: 2008-09

House Kolkata – 700 001 [PAN : AACCV 1846 Q] Appearances by: Shri Dev Kumar Kothari, FCA, appearing on behalf of the assessee. Shri Saurabh Kumar, Additional CIT, DR., appearing on behalf of the Revenue. Date of concluding the hearing : November 06, 2017 Date of pronouncing the order : , 2017 2 I.T.A. No. 1749/Kol/2016 C.O. No. 64/Kol/2016 A/o. I.T.A. No. 1749/Kol/2016 Assessment Year

DCIT, CIRCLE-4(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S VISHNU TEA & INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed in part

ITA 1750/KOL/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata30 Nov 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy, Hon’Ble Am & Sri Aby T. Varkey, Hon’Ble Jm] I.T.A. No. 1749/Kol/2016 Assessment Year: 2008-09 C.O. No. 64/Kol/2016 A/O. I.T.A. No. 1749/Kol/2016 Assessment Year: 2008-09

House Kolkata – 700 001 [PAN : AACCV 1846 Q] Appearances by: Shri Dev Kumar Kothari, FCA, appearing on behalf of the assessee. Shri Saurabh Kumar, Additional CIT, DR., appearing on behalf of the Revenue. Date of concluding the hearing : November 06, 2017 Date of pronouncing the order : , 2017 2 I.T.A. No. 1749/Kol/2016 C.O. No. 64/Kol/2016 A/o. I.T.A. No. 1749/Kol/2016 Assessment Year

DCIT, CIRCLE-4(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S VISHNU TEA & INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed in part

ITA 1829/KOL/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata30 Nov 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy, Hon’Ble Am & Sri Aby T. Varkey, Hon’Ble Jm] I.T.A. No. 1749/Kol/2016 Assessment Year: 2008-09 C.O. No. 64/Kol/2016 A/O. I.T.A. No. 1749/Kol/2016 Assessment Year: 2008-09

House Kolkata – 700 001 [PAN : AACCV 1846 Q] Appearances by: Shri Dev Kumar Kothari, FCA, appearing on behalf of the assessee. Shri Saurabh Kumar, Additional CIT, DR., appearing on behalf of the Revenue. Date of concluding the hearing : November 06, 2017 Date of pronouncing the order : , 2017 2 I.T.A. No. 1749/Kol/2016 C.O. No. 64/Kol/2016 A/o. I.T.A. No. 1749/Kol/2016 Assessment Year

M/S PHILIPS INDIA LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR-12(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

ITA 539/KOL/2016[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Dec 2017AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri N.V.Vasudevan & Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(5)Section 92C

property rights. (e) R&D activities –further the company is also involved in R&D activities. (f) Not appearing in the final list of comparables of the TPO order in the assessee own case- Infosys Ltd. is not appearing in the final list of comparables in respect to the TPO order for:- " AY 2009-10 (refer

DCIT, CIR-12(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S PHILIPS INDIA LTD., KOLKATA

ITA 863/KOL/2016[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Dec 2017AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri N.V.Vasudevan & Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(5)Section 92C

property rights. (e) R&D activities –further the company is also involved in R&D activities. (f) Not appearing in the final list of comparables of the TPO order in the assessee own case- Infosys Ltd. is not appearing in the final list of comparables in respect to the TPO order for:- " AY 2009-10 (refer