BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “disallowance”+ Section 80Mclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai125Delhi67Bangalore21Chennai11Kolkata9Ahmedabad6Pune5Karnataka5Raipur5Jaipur4Telangana2Punjab & Haryana2SC2Hyderabad1Orissa1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)13Section 115B6Section 271(1)(c)6Deduction6Section 80M5Section 2504Section 14A4Disallowance4Section 1543Section 40A(2)

PURNASONS PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD-8(1), KOLKATA

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1441/KOL/2023[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 Apr 2024AY 2021-22

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Pradip Kumar Choubey

Section 139Section 143(1)Section 154Section 250Section 80M

80M of the Act worth of Rs. 30 Lakh. The assessee being aggrieved filed for re-processing, but CPC did not make any correction. Ultimately, the assessee filed appeal before ld. CIT(A). Ld. CIT(A) after considering the submission and the documents again disallowed the deduction of Rs. 30 Lakh and confirmed the order of the AO. 3. Being

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-4, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. ROSSELL INDIA LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal stands dismissed

3
Addition to Income3
ITA 2774/KOL/2013[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Mar 2017AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri Aby.T Varkey & Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year:2009-10 Dcit, Circle-4, Kolkata V/S. M/S Rossell India Ltd. P-7, Chowringhee 21/1A/3, Darga Road, Square, Kolkata-69 Jindal Towers, Block B, 4Th Floor, Park Circus, Kolkta-700 017 [Pan Noaabcr 3736 J] .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

Section 10(34)Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 14A

sections (2) and (3) of sec. 14A and Sub-rule(l) of Rule 80, assessing officer had rightly invoked the said Rules for determining that portion of interest which is to be disallowed u/s 14A. Ld. CIT(A)'s observation was not correct more so when no opportunity was allowed to A.O. under Rule 46A to examine the fresh submission

FREEWINGS POWER & INFRA LIMITED ,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 10(1), KOLKATA , KOLKATA

Appeal is allowed

ITA 778/KOL/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata25 Jan 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S.S, Godaraassessment Year:2012-13

Section 143(3)Section 40A(2)Section 40A(2)(b)

section 40A(2) of the Income Tax. Act, 1961 by treating the same as extraneous and unreasonable with reference to the business exigency in the case of appellant without considering the fact that in the preceding previous year the director remuneration/salary was more than current previous year and to discharge the day to day affairs of the company the directors

ACIT, CIR-10, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S ICI INDIA LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 2355/KOL/2005[1996-97]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata27 Nov 2015AY 1996-97

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 143(3)

disallowed the same and adjusted the sale proceed of those undertakings against the WDV of the respective block of asset and if any gain arose then it was worked out as short term capital gain within the provisions of section 50 of the Act. Therefore, the AO held the sale proceed should be adjusted from the relevant block of asset

ICI INDIA LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR-10, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 850/KOL/2007[1996-97]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata27 Nov 2015AY 1996-97

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 143(3)

disallowed the same and adjusted the sale proceed of those undertakings against the WDV of the respective block of asset and if any gain arose then it was worked out as short term capital gain within the provisions of section 50 of the Act. Therefore, the AO held the sale proceed should be adjusted from the relevant block of asset

DCIT, CIR-10, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S ICI INDIA LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 1021/KOL/2007[1996-97]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata27 Nov 2015AY 1996-97

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 143(3)

disallowed the same and adjusted the sale proceed of those undertakings against the WDV of the respective block of asset and if any gain arose then it was worked out as short term capital gain within the provisions of section 50 of the Act. Therefore, the AO held the sale proceed should be adjusted from the relevant block of asset

JCIT (OSD), CIR- 11(1), , KOLKATA vs. M/S. GOBIND SUGAR MILLS LTD. , KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 235/KOL/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 Jul 2023AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble & Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Shri Ankit Goel, A/RFor Respondent: Shri Abhijit Kundu, CIT D/R
Section 115BSection 143(1)(a)Section 250Section 32(1)(iia)

disallowance of claim of adjustment of brought forward additional depreciation in determining the taxable income u/s 115BAA of the I.T Act, 1961. 3. That the CIT(A) has erred in ignoring the clarification issued by CBDT vide Circular No. 29 of 2019 dated 02.10.2019 [F. No 142/20/2019-TPL dated 02.10.2019]. 4. That the appellant craves leave to add any new ground

MSTC LTD,KOLKATA vs. JURISDICTIONAL ASSESSING OFFICER, CIR-1(1), KOLKATA. , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 623/KOL/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata01 Oct 2024AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishraassessment Year: 2021-22

For Appellant: Shri Prasun Bhattacharya, ARFor Respondent: Shri Manjeet Singh, CIT, DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 154Section 250

80M as per Income Tax Return by the AO. 13. For that without prejudice to any other ground taken, the Ld. CIT(A) erred both in law and in the facts and circumstances of the case to not have dealt with invocation of Section 234A, 234B and Section 234C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on disputed additions and levying

D.C.I.T CC - XX,KOLKATA., KOLKATA vs. M/S PAHARPUR COLLING TOWERS LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue, is dismissed

ITA 1927/KOL/2012[1990-91]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata08 Mar 2017AY 1990-91

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am]

For Appellant: N o n eFor Respondent: Shri NavinVerma, ACA
Section 143(3)Section 2Section 271(1)(c)

section on gross basis, it cannot be said that the appellant had concealed its income or a furnished inaccurate particulars in respect of its claim. As discussed above, the appellant had not concealed any income nor had furnished any inaccurate particulars of his income. Further, as has been held in judicial precedence discussed above, mere disallowance of the assessee