BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 80Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Bangalore23Ahmedabad21Mumbai15Delhi13Visakhapatnam5Indore5Jaipur3Kolkata3Surat2Pune1Telangana1Guwahati1Chennai1Patna1Hyderabad1Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 80I14Section 92C2Section 133(6)2Deduction2Disallowance2Addition to Income2

DCIT, CIRCLE - 12, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. BENGAL AMBUJA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of revenue are dismissed

ITA 1080/KOL/2010[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata24 Nov 2015AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Am]

For Appellant: Shri S. S. Alam, JCIT, Sr. DRFor Respondent: Shri D. S. Damle, FCA
Section 143(3)Section 80I

disallowing the deduction u/s. 80IB(10). As per the amendment effected by the Finance (No.2) Act 2004; which came into force from A. Y.2005-06; an eligible housing project could not contain commercial area of more than 2000 sq.ft. According to AO; appellant's housing project contained "Utsa Centre" which had commercial area of 5000 sq.ft and this was more than

ARUN KUMAR JALAN,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WD-34(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

ITA 1400/KOL/2016[2011-12]Status: Disposed
ITAT Kolkata
13 Apr 2018
AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap

Section 133(6)Section 80E

disallow the claim made u/s 80E of the I.T. Act, 1961. 2. At the time of hearing before the Tribunal, the ld. Counsel for the assessee has not pressed Ground No. 1. The same is accordingly dismissed as not pressed. I.T.A. No 1400/KOL/2016 Assessment year: 2011-2012 Page 2 of 7 3. Apropos the issue involved in Ground

DCIT CIR-4(1), KOLKATA, AAYAKAR BHAWAN vs. MCLEOD RUSSEL INDIA LTD, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1169/KOL/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Apr 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar&Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey]

Section 115OSection 143(2)Section 14ASection 80ISection 92C

disallowed in AY 2009-10 which was clearly not the case and in that view of the matter the denial of deduction u/s 80E in respect of these nine tea estates is held to be unwarranted. As noted in the foregoing, these nine tea estates were held to be eligible for deduction u/s 80IE by the AO in the initial