BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “disallowance”+ Section 80Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Bangalore23Ahmedabad21Mumbai16Delhi13Jaipur6Kolkata4Surat2Visakhapatnam2Chennai1Patna1Indore1Telangana1Pune1Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 80I19Section 2503Deduction3Disallowance3Addition to Income3Section 133(6)2Section 92C2

DCIT, CIRCLE - 12, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. BENGAL AMBUJA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of revenue are dismissed

ITA 1080/KOL/2010[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata24 Nov 2015AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Am]

For Appellant: Shri S. S. Alam, JCIT, Sr. DRFor Respondent: Shri D. S. Damle, FCA
Section 143(3)Section 80I

disallowing the deduction u/s. 80IB(10). As per the amendment effected by the Finance (No.2) Act 2004; which came into force from A. Y.2005-06; an eligible housing project could not contain commercial area of more than 2000 sq.ft. According to AO; appellant's housing project contained "Utsa Centre" which had commercial area of 5000 sq.ft and this was more than

M/S. LA OPALA RG LTD.,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T., CIRCLE - 11(1), KOLKATA

In the result, this appeal is partly allowed

ITA 1891/KOL/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata06 May 2025AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey\Nand Shri Sanjay Awasthi\Nita No. 1891/Kol/2024\N Assessment Year: 2017-18\Nm/S. La Opala Rg Ltd.\N8Th Floor, Premises No.803 &\N804 Eco Centre Em-4,\Nsector-V, Kolkata-91.\N(Pan: Aaacl5569J)\N(Appellant)\Ndcit, Circle-11(1) (Formerly\Ncircle-12(1), Kolkata)\Nvs.\N(Respondent)\Npresent For:\Nappellant By : Shri A. K. Tulsyan, Fca\Nrespondent By : Smt. Monalisha Pal Mukherjee, Jcit, Sr. Dr\Ndate Of Hearing : 30.04.2025\Ndate Of Pronouncement : 06.05.2025\Norder\Nper Sanjay Awasthi:\Nthe Present Appeal Emanates From Order Passed U/S.250 Of The\Nincome Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As The “Act”) On 31.07.2024\Nby Ld. Cit(A), Nfac, Delhi.\N1.

For Appellant: Shri A. K. Tulsyan, FCAFor Respondent: Smt. Monalisha Pal Mukherjee, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 250Section 80ISection 80l

80E of the Act, have been replaced by ‘Industrial\nundertakings' in section 80-I of the Act. It clearly means that as per\nthe Hon'ble Supreme Court's decision in Cambay Electric Supply\nIndustrial Co. Ltd. case (supra) receipts from the actual conduct of\nbusiness of the industrial undertaking, are the profits and gains\nderived therefrom. Otherwise also

ARUN KUMAR JALAN,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WD-34(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

ITA 1400/KOL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Apr 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap

Section 133(6)Section 80E

disallow the claim made u/s 80E of the I.T. Act, 1961. 2. At the time of hearing before the Tribunal, the ld. Counsel for the assessee has not pressed Ground No. 1. The same is accordingly dismissed as not pressed. I.T.A. No 1400/KOL/2016 Assessment year: 2011-2012 Page 2 of 7 3. Apropos the issue involved in Ground

DCIT CIR-4(1), KOLKATA, AAYAKAR BHAWAN vs. MCLEOD RUSSEL INDIA LTD, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1169/KOL/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Apr 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar&Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey]

Section 115OSection 143(2)Section 14ASection 80ISection 92C

disallowed in AY 2009-10 which was clearly not the case and in that view of the matter the denial of deduction u/s 80E in respect of these nine tea estates is held to be unwarranted. As noted in the foregoing, these nine tea estates were held to be eligible for deduction u/s 80IE by the AO in the initial