BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

646 results for “disallowance”+ Section 43Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,609Mumbai1,247Kolkata646Bangalore608Chennai554Pune287Jaipur195Ahmedabad182Hyderabad175Raipur139Chandigarh133Indore79Lucknow79Visakhapatnam60Surat40Nagpur32Guwahati29Cochin27Amritsar23Rajkot22Cuttack20Jabalpur18SC13Patna12Ranchi12Panaji11Kerala9Karnataka7Calcutta7Dehradun7Jodhpur5Agra5Punjab & Haryana4Allahabad3Rajasthan3Himachal Pradesh3Telangana3Varanasi1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1J&K1

Key Topics

Section 43B142Section 36(1)(va)81Disallowance68Section 143(1)58Section 143(3)53Addition to Income52Deduction47Section 25045Section 139(1)26Section 263

SINGHANIA & SONS (P) LTD,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CIR. 10(2), KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is treated as partly allowed

ITA 412/KOL/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata06 Dec 2021AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Hon’Ble Vice-, Kz) Assessment Year: 2017-18 Singhania & Sons Pvt. Ltd…………...............................................................………………….............Appellant 3D, Duckback House 41, Shakespeare Sarani Kolkata – 700 017 [Pan : Aadcs 6078 A] Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)- Nfac...............................................………..…......Respondent Appearances By: Shri Manoj Katarua, Advocate, Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee. Shri Biswanath Das, Addl. Cit, D/R, Appearing On Behalf Of The Revenue.

Section 14ASection 250

43B as well as Section 36(1)(va) are not applicable in the assessment year under consideration for the present case as it is for AY 2017 year under consideration for the present case as it is for AY 2017 year under consideration for the present case as it is for AY 2017-18 and therefore according

DCIT, CIRCLE - 6(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. INTEGRATED COAL MINING LIMITED, KOLKATA

Appeal is partly allowed in above terms

Showing 1–20 of 646 · Page 1 of 33

...
22
Section 2(24)(x)17
Limitation/Time-bar13
ITA 170/KOL/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Mar 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Sainiassessment Year :2010-11 Dcit, Circle-6(1), V/S. M/S Integrated Coal P-7, Chowringhee Mining Ltd., 6, Church Square, Kolkata-69 Lane, 1Ste Floor, Kolakta-700001 [Pan No.Aaaci 5584 L] .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Dr. P.K. Srihari, Cit-Dr अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/By Appellant Shri Diparun Mukherjee, Aca & ""यथ" क" ओर से/By Respondent Shri Alolk Goenka, Aca 15-01-2019 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing 15-03-2019 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement

Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 43B

disallowed Rs.30,44,09,948/- towards RE Cess and Rs.7,61,02,510/- towards PE Cess. On first appeal, the Learned CIT(A) held that the provisions of section 43B

KATHLEEN CONFECTIONERS,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR-32, KOLKATA. , KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1187/KOL/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Jan 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2019-20

For Appellant: Shri N. S. Saini, Advocate & Shri SonuFor Respondent: Shri Loviesh Shelley, JCIT, DR
Section 143(1)Section 2(24)Section 3Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

Section 43B or anything contained in that provision would not absolve the assessee from its liability to deposit the employee's contribution on or before the due date as a condition for deduction.” 5. Contention raised by the Ld. Counsel for the assessee that disallowance

M/S BALAJI EXPORT CORPORATION,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR. 29, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 530/KOL/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Dec 2021AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap(Kz) &Shri A. T. Varkey] Assessment Year: 2019-20

Section 139Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

disallowing delayed deposit of employees contribution towards PF and ESI amounting to Rs.3,61,241/-by invoking the provision of section 36(1)(va) when the same was paid within the due date of filing the return of income and was therefore duly allowable under section 43B

DIAMOND ENGINEERING ,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CPC, BANGALORE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 472/KOL/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Feb 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey] I.T.A. No. 472 & 473/Kol/2021 Assessment Years: 2018-19 & 2019-20 Diamond Engineering Vs. Dcit, Cpc, Bengaluru (Pan:Aacfd5820F) Appellant Respondent

Section 139Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

disallowance is warranted. The CIT(A) erred in referring to the Amendment brought in by Finance Act 2021 w.e.f. 01.04.2021 which inserted an Explanation to section 36(1)(va) and section 43B

DIAMOND ENGINEERING ,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CPC, BANGALORE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 473/KOL/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Feb 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey] I.T.A. No. 472 & 473/Kol/2021 Assessment Years: 2018-19 & 2019-20 Diamond Engineering Vs. Dcit, Cpc, Bengaluru (Pan:Aacfd5820F) Appellant Respondent

Section 139Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

disallowance is warranted. The CIT(A) erred in referring to the Amendment brought in by Finance Act 2021 w.e.f. 01.04.2021 which inserted an Explanation to section 36(1)(va) and section 43B

SHYAMAL BANERJEE,PURULIA vs. CPC, , BANGALORE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 502/KOL/2021[502]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Feb 2022

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey] I.T.A. No. 502/Kol/2021 Assessment Years: 2018-19 Shyamal Banerjee Vs. Cit(A), Nfac, Delhi (Pan:Adupb0408N) Appellant Respondent

Section 139Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

disallowance is warranted. The CIT(A) erred in referring to the Amendment brought in by Finance Act 2021 w.e.f. 01.04.2021 which inserted an Explanation to section 36(1)(va) and section 43B

JAYANTA CHAKRABORTY,DURGAPUR vs. ITO, WARD 1(2), DURGAPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 568/KOL/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Feb 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

Section 139Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

disallowance is warranted. The CIT(A) erred in referring to the Amendment brought in by Finance Act 2021 w.e.f. 01.04.2021 which inserted an Explanation to section 36(1)(va) and section 43B

SHRI TARIT KUMAR GHOSH,KOLKATA vs. A.O. CPC, BANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 500/KOL/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Feb 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey] I.T.A. No. 499 & 500/Kol/2021 Assessment Years: 2018-19 & 2019-20 Shri Tarit Kumar Ghosh Vs. Dcit, Cpc, Bengaluru (Pan: Adhpg7436L) Appellant Respondent

Section 139Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

disallowance is warranted. The CIT(A) erred in referring to the Amendment brought in by Finance Act 2021 w.e.f. 01.04.2021 which inserted an Explanation to section 36(1)(va) and section 43B

B D AUTOMOBILES PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CPC, BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 596/KOL/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Feb 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

Section 139Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

disallowance is warranted. The CIT(A) erred in referring to the Amendment brought in by Finance Act 2021 w.e.f. 01.04.2021 which inserted an Explanation to section 36(1)(va) and section 43B

SHRI TARIT KUMAR GHOSH,KOLKATA vs. A.O. CPC, BANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 499/KOL/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Feb 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey] I.T.A. No. 499 & 500/Kol/2021 Assessment Years: 2018-19 & 2019-20 Shri Tarit Kumar Ghosh Vs. Dcit, Cpc, Bengaluru (Pan: Adhpg7436L) Appellant Respondent

Section 139Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

disallowance is warranted. The CIT(A) erred in referring to the Amendment brought in by Finance Act 2021 w.e.f. 01.04.2021 which inserted an Explanation to section 36(1)(va) and section 43B

EARTHBAGS EXPORT (P) LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD-4(4), KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 574/KOL/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Feb 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

Section 139Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

disallowance is warranted. The CIT(A) erred in referring to the Amendment brought in by Finance Act 2021 w.e.f. 01.04.2021 which inserted an Explanation to section 36(1)(va) and section 43B

BOROJALINGAH TEA COMPA NY ,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD-34(1), KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 465/KOL/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata18 Feb 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey] I.T.A. No. 465/Kol/2021 Assessment Year: 2019-20 Borojalingah Tea Company Vs. Ito, Ward-34(1), Kolkata (Pan: Aacfb7772N) Appellant Respondent

Section 139Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

disallowance is warranted. According to the Ld. AR, the CIT(A) erred in referring to the Amendment brought in by Finance Act 2021 w.e.f. 01.04.2021 which inserted an Explanation to section 36(1)(va) and section 43B

LANSHEE PRODUCTS AND SERVICES LTD,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR. 7(1), KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 328/KOL/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Dec 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri P. M. Jagtap, Vp (Kz) & Shri A. T. Varkey]

Section 139Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

disallowance is warranted. According to the Ld. AR, the CIT(A) erred in referring to the Amendment brought in by Finance Act 2021 w.e.f. 01.04.2021 which inserted an Explanation to section 36(1)(va) and section 43B

ARADHANA DISTRIBUTORS PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. CPC, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 522/KOL/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Dec 2021AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri P. M. Jagtap, Vp (Kz) & Shri A. T. Varkey]

Section 139Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

disallowance is warranted. According to the Ld. AR, the CIT(A) erred in referring to the Amendment brought in by Finance Act 2021 w.e.f. 01.04.2021 which inserted an Explanation to section 36(1)(va) and section 43B

LANSHEE PRODUCTS AND SERVICES LTD,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR. 7(1), KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 330/KOL/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Dec 2021AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri P. M. Jagtap, Vp (Kz) & Shri A. T. Varkey]

Section 139Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

disallowance is warranted. According to the Ld. AR, the CIT(A) erred in referring to the Amendment brought in by Finance Act 2021 w.e.f. 01.04.2021 which inserted an Explanation to section 36(1)(va) and section 43B

LANSHEE PRODUCTS AND SERVICES LTD,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR. 7(1), KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 329/KOL/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Dec 2021AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri P. M. Jagtap, Vp (Kz) & Shri A. T. Varkey]

Section 139Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

disallowance is warranted. According to the Ld. AR, the CIT(A) erred in referring to the Amendment brought in by Finance Act 2021 w.e.f. 01.04.2021 which inserted an Explanation to section 36(1)(va) and section 43B

PLASTO ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CPC, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 523/KOL/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Dec 2021AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap(Kz) &Shri A. T. Varkey] Assessment Year: 2018-19

Section 139Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

disallowance is warranted. According to the Ld. AR, the CIT(A) erred in referring to the Amendment brought in by Finance Act 2021 w.e.f. 01.04.2021 which inserted an Explanation to section 36(1)(va) and section 43B

TAPAN PAUL,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CPC, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 509/KOL/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Dec 2021AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap(Kz) &Shri A. T. Varkey] Assessment Year: 2018-19

Section 139Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

disallowance is warranted. According to the Ld. AR, the CIT(A) erred in referring to the Amendment brought in by Finance Act 2021 w.e.f. 01.04.2021 which inserted an Explanation to section 36(1)(va) and section 43B

M/S JAIKISHANDASS MALL JUTE PRODUCTS PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. CPC, , BANGALURU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 342/KOL/2021[2018-19]Status: HeardITAT Kolkata21 Feb 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey & Shri Rajesh Kumar]

Section 139Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

disallowance is warranted. According to the Ld. AR, the CIT(A) erred in referring to the Amendment brought in by Finance Act 2021 w.e.f. 01.04.2021 which inserted an Explanation to section 36(1)(va) and section 43B