BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

1,402 results for “disallowance”+ Section 43(5)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai5,095Delhi5,035Bangalore1,639Chennai1,592Kolkata1,402Ahmedabad1,274Jaipur862Hyderabad756Pune740Chandigarh507Indore450Surat326Raipur268Amritsar229Cochin225Visakhapatnam211Cuttack188Rajkot174Nagpur165Karnataka144Agra115Guwahati110Lucknow107Jodhpur100Ranchi68Allahabad67SC59Telangana54Calcutta45Patna31Dehradun30Panaji24Jabalpur21Varanasi19Kerala14Punjab & Haryana6Himachal Pradesh4Rajasthan3Orissa3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1Gauhati1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)82Section 14A60Addition to Income59Disallowance53Deduction38Section 25036Section 115J30Section 143(1)29Section 4029Section 147

RAMPURIA INDUSTRIES & INVESTMENTS LTD., ,KOLKATA vs. PRINCIPAL CIT, CENTRAL - 1, KOLKATA , KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 651/KOL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 Feb 2020AY 2013-14
Section 143(3)Section 2Section 263Section 43(5)(d)

43(5) of the Act provided other conditions are speculation transactions u/s 43(5) of the Act provided other conditions are speculation transactions u/s 43(5) of the Act provided other conditions are satisfied because of recent and systemic and techn satisfied because of recent and systemic and technological changes introduced by ological changes introduced by stock exchanges. We have

RIDHI VINCOM PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 4(1),, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Showing 1–20 of 1,402 · Page 1 of 71

...
28
Section 43B27
Depreciation12
ITA 947/KOL/2025[2013-2014]Status: Disposed
ITAT Kolkata
15 Oct 2025
AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shripradip Kumar Choubey, Jm Ito, Ward 4(1) Ridhi Vincom Pvt. Ltd. Aaykar Bhawan Poorva, C/O M/S Salarpuriajajodia& Co. P-7, Chowringhee Square, 7, C.R. Avenue, 3 Rd Floor, Vs. 8Th Floor, Kolkata-700069, Kolkata-700072, West Bengal West Bengal (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaecr9858C Assessee By : Shri S. Jhajharia, Ar Revenue By : Shri Manas Mondal, Dr Date Of Hearing: 17.09.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 15.10.2025

For Appellant: Shri S. Jhajharia, ARFor Respondent: Shri Manas Mondal, DR
Section 43(5)(d)

Section 43(5) of the Act. This being the position, the loss arising from derivative transaction has been incorrectly disallowed

SHETH COMMERCIAL CO.,KOLKATA vs. PR.CIT-14, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1100/KOL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata12 Jun 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.1100/Kol/2019 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2014-15)

For Appellant: Shri Miraj D Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Ram Bilash Meena, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 43(5)

section 43(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ('the Act')/ was applicable to the transactions in foreign currency futures entered into by the appellant and therefore that the loss from these transactions was not in the nature of speculation loss." 7. The Tribunal decided the issue as under:- "considering the relevant provisions of the relevant Acts, discussed here

ITO, WD-2(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S SUVRIDHI CAPITAL MARKETS LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue (ITA No

ITA 830/KOL/2015[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 Aug 2017AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan, Jm & Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.830 & 831/Kol/2015 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2008-09 & 2010-11) Vs. M/S Suvridhi Capital I.T.O., Ward – 2(4), Kolkata Markets Ltd. 516, Kamalalaya Centre, 156A, Lelin Sarani, Kolkata – 700 013. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaecs 4092 F ( Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellant By :Shri G. H. Sema, Acit(Dr) Respondent By :Shri Ashis Kumar Rustogi, Fca सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 17/08/2017 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 31/08/2017 आदेश / O R D E R Per Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Am: These Two Captioned Appeals Filed By The Revenue Pertaining To Assessment Year 2008-09 & 2010-11, Are Directed By Order Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Which Is In Turn Arises Out Of Assessment Orders Passed By The Assessing Officer U/S 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’). 2. Since These Two Appeals Filed By The Revenue Pertain To Same Assessee, Different Assessment Years & Identical Issues Are Involved, Therefore, These Have Been Clubbed & Heard Together & A Consolidated Order Is Being Passed For The Sake Of Convenience & Brevity. The Revenue`S Appeal In Ita No.830/Kol/2015, Assessment Year 2008-09, Is Taken As A Lead Case.

For Appellant: Shri G. H. Sema, ACIT(DR)For Respondent: Shri Ashis Kumar Rustogi, FCA
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 43(5)Section 73

disallowing the adjustment of losses on share trading with other business income. 7.1 The ld Counsel submitted that from the above discussion, it may be concluded that both trading of shares and derivative transactions are not coming under the purview of Section 43(5

DCIT, CIRCLE - 6, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. NARIMAN FINVEST (P) LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal stands dismissed and that of assessee’s CO is partly allowed

ITA 1614/KOL/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Aug 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 43(5)

43(5) is concerned - Held, yes - Whether loss from share dealing should be allowed to be set off from profits from F & O in share transactions - Held, yes - Whether thus, before application of Explanation to section 73, aggregation of business profit or loss from these transactions is to be worked out irrespective of fact whether it is from share delivery

D.C.I.T CIR - 3,KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S JAROLI VINCOM PVT LTD, KOLKATA

In the result, both appeal of Revenue is dismissed and that of assessee’s CO is dismissed as infructous

ITA 877/KOL/2013[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Dec 2015AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 143(3)Section 43(5)Section 43(5)(d)

Section 43(5) of the Act. In view of such amendment under the Act, the income/loss arrived on derivative shall be treated as non-speculative loss. Taking a consistent view and relying on the above cited case law, we confirm the order of Ld. CIT(A) and this ground of Revenue’s appeal is dismissed. 6. Next ground raised

D.C.I.T CIR - 3,KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S JAROLI VINCOM PVT LTD, KOLKATA

In the result, both appeal of Revenue is dismissed and that of assessee’s CO is dismissed as infructous

ITA 878/KOL/2013[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Dec 2015AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 143(3)Section 43(5)Section 43(5)(d)

Section 43(5) of the Act. In view of such amendment under the Act, the income/loss arrived on derivative shall be treated as non-speculative loss. Taking a consistent view and relying on the above cited case law, we confirm the order of Ld. CIT(A) and this ground of Revenue’s appeal is dismissed. 6. Next ground raised

ITO, WARD-5(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. FORTUNE INTERFINANCE LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2064/KOL/2014[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Aug 2016AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap

Section 43(5)Section 73

disallowed by the Assessing Officer in the assessment completed under section 143(3) vide an order dated 19.03.2013. 4. Against the order passed by the Assessing Officer under section 143(3), an appeal was preferred by the assessee before the ld. CIT(Appeals) and after considering the submissions made by the assessee as well as the material available on record

DCIT, CIR-12(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. TEGA INDUSTRIES LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, the Cross Objections filed by the assessee (in C

ITA 1049/KOL/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 Oct 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri A.T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L.Saini, Am

For Appellant: DR. P. K. Srihari, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri Chidambaram, Advocate
Section 14ASection 92C

Section 43(5) of the Act. With merely such remarks, the Ld. AO disallowed loss of Rs.4,74,97,275/- holding

DCIT, CIR-12(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. TEGA INDUSTRIES LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, the Cross Objections filed by the assessee (in C

ITA 1048/KOL/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 Oct 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri A.T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L.Saini, Am

For Appellant: DR. P. K. Srihari, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri Chidambaram, Advocate
Section 14ASection 92C

Section 43(5) of the Act. With merely such remarks, the Ld. AO disallowed loss of Rs.4,74,97,275/- holding

DCIT, CIR-12(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. TEGA INDUSTRIES LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, the Cross Objections filed by the assessee (in C

ITA 1047/KOL/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 Oct 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri A.T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L.Saini, Am

For Appellant: DR. P. K. Srihari, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri Chidambaram, Advocate
Section 14ASection 92C

Section 43(5) of the Act. With merely such remarks, the Ld. AO disallowed loss of Rs.4,74,97,275/- holding

MEGAPODE VYAPAAR PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T., CENTRAL CIRCLE - 1(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, ITA No. 98/KOL/2023 is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 98/KOL/2023[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata12 Mar 2024AY 2012-2013

Bench: Sri Rajesh Kumar & Sri Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250Section 43(5)

Section 43(5) of the Act the normal loss as a trading loss as speculative loss. The ld. A/R submitted his argument that there is no question of any unidentified loss and the assessee had established the genuineness of the transaction. Related to other addition in ground no. 3, 4 & 5 the ld. A/R placed that the documents were

ACIT, CC-XX, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. PAHARPUR COOLING TOWERS LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, this ground is allowed

ITA 1370/KOL/2010[2001-02]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Mar 2017AY 2001-02

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh, Am & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm]

For Appellant: Shri Sallong Yaden, Addl. CITFor Respondent: Shri Navin Verma & Nitin Agarwal, ARs
Section 143(3)

43(5) of the Act , the profits arising on such transactions has to be considered as arising from speculative transactions. The stand of the assessee was not found acceptable by the ld AO. According to him, the profit from badla transactions on account of difference in rates of current settlement or next settlement was liable to be taxed

DCIT, CIRCLE - 6,, KOLKATA vs. LOKNATH SARAF SECURITIES LTD.,, KOLKATA

In the result, to sum up ITA No

ITA 852/KOL/2008[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata08 Jul 2016AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

Section 43(5)Section 73

disallowed by him in the assessment completed under section 143(3) vide an order dated 13.12.2005. 6. Against the order passed by the Assessing Officer under section 143(3), an appeal was preferred by the assessee before the ld. CIT(Appeals) challenging, inter alia, the action of the Assessing Officer in I.T.A. No. 852/KOL./2008 Assessment year: 2003-2004 Assessment

M/S NILLIAMPATHY TRACON PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CIR-9, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result the appeal by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 474/KOL/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata01 Dec 2017AY 2006-07

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Dr.Arjun Lal Saini, Am ] Assessment Year : 2006-07

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Surana, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Arindam Bhattacharjee, Addl. CIT
Section 43Section 43(5)Section 43(5)(d)

43(5)(d). That the appellant craves the leaves to add, alter, modify, clued or delete any of appeal.” 8. As far as the assessee is concerned the assessee is aggrieved by the action of CT(A) in not allowing the set off of loss in respect of trading in derivatives which were incurred by the assessee between 01.04.2005 upto

ITO, WD-15(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S NILLIAMPATHY TRACON PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

In the result the appeal by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 538/KOL/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata01 Dec 2017AY 2006-07

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Dr.Arjun Lal Saini, Am ] Assessment Year : 2006-07

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Surana, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Arindam Bhattacharjee, Addl. CIT
Section 43Section 43(5)Section 43(5)(d)

43(5)(d). That the appellant craves the leaves to add, alter, modify, clued or delete any of appeal.” 8. As far as the assessee is concerned the assessee is aggrieved by the action of CT(A) in not allowing the set off of loss in respect of trading in derivatives which were incurred by the assessee between 01.04.2005 upto

DCIT, CIR-7(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S JET AGE SECURITIES PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1359/KOL/2015[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 Oct 2018AY 2011-2012

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri M.Balaganesh, Am & Hon’Ble Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi, Jm] I.T.A No. 1359/Kol/2015 Assessment Year : 2011-12 Dcit, Circle-7(1), Kolkata -Vs- M/S Jet Age Securities Pvt. Ltd. [Pan: Aabcj 0993 R] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Saurabh Kumar, Addl. CIT Sr. DRFor Respondent: Shri Manoj Kataruka, Advocate
Section 111ASection 143(3)Section 94(7)

43 (5) became effective with effect from 1st April, 2006. Therefore, prior to 1st April, 2006 any transaction in which a contract for the purchase or sale of any commodity including stocks and shares was periodically or ultimately settled otherwise than by the actual delivery or transfer of the commodity or scrip was a speculative transaction. Sub-section

DCIT, CIRCLE - 6, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. K. B. CAPITAL LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of revenue as well as that of the assessee, both are partly allowed

ITA 582/KOL/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Nov 2015AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Am]

For Appellant: Shri Akkal Dudhwewala, ACAFor Respondent: Shri P. K. Chakraborty, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 35(1)(ii)Section 80G

section 115JB.” K. B. Capital Ltd. AY 2007-08 10. At the outset, Ld. Counsel for the assessee stated that this issue is not arising out of the order of CIT(A), hence, this issue cannot be adjudicated and this ground cannot be raised by revenue. On query from the Bench, Ld. Sr. DR fairly conceded that no such ground

K.B. CAPITAL MARKETS (P) LTD.,,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 6, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of revenue as well as that of the assessee, both are partly allowed

ITA 607/KOL/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Nov 2015AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Am]

For Appellant: Shri Akkal Dudhwewala, ACAFor Respondent: Shri P. K. Chakraborty, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 35(1)(ii)Section 80G

section 115JB.” K. B. Capital Ltd. AY 2007-08 10. At the outset, Ld. Counsel for the assessee stated that this issue is not arising out of the order of CIT(A), hence, this issue cannot be adjudicated and this ground cannot be raised by revenue. On query from the Bench, Ld. Sr. DR fairly conceded that no such ground

JAYANT KUMAR BHURA,MUMBAI vs. I.T.O WD - 35(2),KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 901/KOL/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 Oct 2015AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Am]

For Appellant: Shri S. K. Tulsiyan & Shri Ravi Tulsiyan, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kr. Das, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 43(5)

43(5) of the Act, explanation (2) to section 28 and section 73 of the Act. Accordingly, he urged the bench to uphold the orders of the lower authorities. 8. We have heard rival submissions and gone through facts and circumstances of the case in hand. We have also perused the case records. We find from records that, against