BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

140 results for “disallowance”+ Section 40Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi565Mumbai502Chennai232Bangalore158Kolkata140Ahmedabad135Raipur112Jaipur109Hyderabad105Pune82Indore79Surat70Amritsar68Chandigarh59Visakhapatnam47Cuttack40Nagpur40Cochin38Lucknow38Rajkot37Agra28Jodhpur21Allahabad19Patna16SC14Dehradun14Guwahati13Varanasi5Ranchi5Jabalpur3Panaji1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1

Key Topics

Addition to Income79Section 40A(3)77Section 143(3)69Disallowance51Section 26350Section 6848Section 25041Section 4027Condonation of Delay26

AWAS DEVCON PVT. LTD. ,HOWRAH vs. ITO, WARD-14(4), KOLKATA. , KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1217/KOL/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata24 Feb 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Abhishek Bansal, ARFor Respondent: Shri Arun Kanti Dutta, DR
Section 131Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 40A(3)

40A(3) has been amended to provide for disallowance of 20% of the expenditure incurred in cash and Rule 6DD(j) was omitted. Thereafter, by virtue of another amendment, disallowance under section

AWAS DEVCON PVT. LTD. ,HOWRAH vs. ITO, WARD-13(1), KOLKATA. , KOLKATA

Showing 1–20 of 140 · Page 1 of 7

Deduction25
Section 14722
Section 14A22

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1216/KOL/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata24 Feb 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Abhishek Bansal, ARFor Respondent: Shri Arun Kanti Dutta, DR
Section 131Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 40A(3)

40A(3) has been amended to provide for disallowance of 20% of the expenditure incurred in cash and Rule 6DD(j) was omitted. Thereafter, by virtue of another amendment, disallowance under section

RADHAKRISHNA AGRO PRODUCTS,BARDHAMAN vs. ITO, WARD-2(4), BURDWAN. , BURDWAN

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1245/KOL/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata21 Feb 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri S. K. Tulsiyan, Advocate & Sm. PujaFor Respondent: Shri P. P. Barman, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 250(6)Section 40A(3)Section 69A

section 40A(3) do not apply in the said procurement for which disallowance has been made u/s. 40A(3). We also

NARAYAN CHANDRA JANA,PURBA MEDINIPUR vs. ITO, WARD - 27(3), HALDIA, HALDIA

In the result, the appeal of assessee allowed

ITA 1310/KOL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata22 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 133Section 143(3)Section 44ASection 68Section 69

40A sub- section (3) of the Act. 9. Facts in brief are that the assessee has made cash payment to Khadim India Ltd. against purchases which were disallowed

M/S. GUNNY DEALERS LTD. ,KOLKATA vs. ITO, TECH-1, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as partly allowed

ITA 1373/KOL/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata27 Jun 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rakesh Mishrai.T.A. No.1373/Kol/2023 Assessment Years: 2012-13 M/S Gunny Dealers Ltd…………………....................…...……………....Appellant C/O Subash Agarwal & Associates, Advocates Siddha Gibson, 1, Gibson Lane, Suite 213, 2Nd Floor, Kolkata – 700069. [Pan: Aabcg0019R] Vs. Ito, Tech-1, Kolkata………….……………............................…..…..... Respondent Appearances By: Shri Siddharth Agarwal, Advocate, Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee. Shri P. P. Barman, Addl. Cit-Sr. Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : April 30, 2024 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : June 27, 2024 आदेश / Order संजय गग", "या"यक सद"य "वारा / Per Sanjay Garg: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 28.11.2023 Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’). 2. The Assessee In This Appeal Has Taken The Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1. For That On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case, The Ld. Cit(A) Ought To Haye Considered That The Order U/S 143(3) Was Passed By An Authority Who Lacks Jurisdiction Over The Appellant & As Such, The Said Order Is Bad In Law & Is Liable To Be Quashed. 2. For That On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case, The Ld. Cit(A) Was Not Justified In Confirming The Disallowance Of

Section 131Section 143(3)Section 250Section 36(1)(va)Section 40A(3)

disallowance under sub-section (3) of section 40A shall be made and no payment shall be deemed to be the profits

BARIK BISWAS,BASIRHAT vs. ACIT, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 522/KOL/2024[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Apr 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

For Appellant: S/Shri S.M. Surana, Adv &For Respondent: Shri Subhendu Datta &
Section 143Section 143(3)Section 147Section 147oSection 148Section 263

Section 40A(3) of the Act for purchase of coal and bricks and ₹1,81,96,959/- u/s 40A(3) of the Act in respect of Carriage Inward and Rs. 4,97,26,457 u/s 40A(3) in respect of labour charges. 018. In this case also the ld. AO has disallowed

BARIK BISWAS,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 1094/KOL/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Apr 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

For Appellant: S/Shri S.M. Surana, Adv &For Respondent: Shri Subhendu Datta &
Section 143Section 143(3)Section 147Section 147oSection 148Section 263

Section 40A(3) of the Act for purchase of coal and bricks and ₹1,81,96,959/- u/s 40A(3) of the Act in respect of Carriage Inward and Rs. 4,97,26,457 u/s 40A(3) in respect of labour charges. 018. In this case also the ld. AO has disallowed

BARIK BISWAS,BASIRHAT vs. ACIT, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 525/KOL/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Apr 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

For Appellant: S/Shri S.M. Surana, Adv &For Respondent: Shri Subhendu Datta &
Section 143Section 143(3)Section 147Section 147oSection 148Section 263

Section 40A(3) of the Act for purchase of coal and bricks and ₹1,81,96,959/- u/s 40A(3) of the Act in respect of Carriage Inward and Rs. 4,97,26,457 u/s 40A(3) in respect of labour charges. 018. In this case also the ld. AO has disallowed

BARIK BISWAS,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 918/KOL/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Apr 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

For Appellant: S/Shri S.M. Surana, Adv &For Respondent: Shri Subhendu Datta &
Section 143Section 143(3)Section 147Section 147oSection 148Section 263

Section 40A(3) of the Act for purchase of coal and bricks and ₹1,81,96,959/- u/s 40A(3) of the Act in respect of Carriage Inward and Rs. 4,97,26,457 u/s 40A(3) in respect of labour charges. 018. In this case also the ld. AO has disallowed

BARIK BISWAS,BASIRHAT vs. ACIT, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 521/KOL/2024[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Apr 2025AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

For Appellant: S/Shri S.M. Surana, Adv &For Respondent: Shri Subhendu Datta &
Section 143Section 143(3)Section 147Section 147oSection 148Section 263

Section 40A(3) of the Act for purchase of coal and bricks and ₹1,81,96,959/- u/s 40A(3) of the Act in respect of Carriage Inward and Rs. 4,97,26,457 u/s 40A(3) in respect of labour charges. 018. In this case also the ld. AO has disallowed

BARIK BISWAS,BASIRHAT vs. ACIT, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 527/KOL/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Apr 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

For Appellant: S/Shri S.M. Surana, Adv &For Respondent: Shri Subhendu Datta &
Section 143Section 143(3)Section 147Section 147oSection 148Section 263

Section 40A(3) of the Act for purchase of coal and bricks and ₹1,81,96,959/- u/s 40A(3) of the Act in respect of Carriage Inward and Rs. 4,97,26,457 u/s 40A(3) in respect of labour charges. 018. In this case also the ld. AO has disallowed

BARIK BISWAS,BASIRHAT vs. ACIT, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 523/KOL/2024[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Apr 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

For Appellant: S/Shri S.M. Surana, Adv &For Respondent: Shri Subhendu Datta &
Section 143Section 143(3)Section 147Section 147oSection 148Section 263

Section 40A(3) of the Act for purchase of coal and bricks and ₹1,81,96,959/- u/s 40A(3) of the Act in respect of Carriage Inward and Rs. 4,97,26,457 u/s 40A(3) in respect of labour charges. 018. In this case also the ld. AO has disallowed

BARIK BISWAS,BASIRHAT vs. ACIT, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 524/KOL/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Apr 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

For Appellant: S/Shri S.M. Surana, Adv &For Respondent: Shri Subhendu Datta &
Section 143Section 143(3)Section 147Section 147oSection 148Section 263

Section 40A(3) of the Act for purchase of coal and bricks and ₹1,81,96,959/- u/s 40A(3) of the Act in respect of Carriage Inward and Rs. 4,97,26,457 u/s 40A(3) in respect of labour charges. 018. In this case also the ld. AO has disallowed

CHANDRAS CHEMICAL ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE 10(1), , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 929/KOL/2025[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata08 Dec 2025AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 40Section 40A(3)

disallowed for the subject payments. Accordingly, the observation of the AO that in respect of payments made by assessee otherwise than by account payee cheque is clearly violative of provisions of section 40A

SHYAMAPADA JANA,PASCHIM MEDINIPUR vs. ITO, WD-2(2) , NOW WARD-39(2), MEDINIPUR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 597/KOL/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 Aug 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Sri Rajesh Kumar & Sonjoy Sarma

Section 40A(3)

section 40A (3) is not to restrict the assessee's genuine business activity.” 7. Thus, in view of the facts of the case and the ratio laid down in the above decisions, we are inclined to set aside the order of Ld. CIT(A) and direct Ld. AO to delete the disallowance

SHYAMAPADA JANA,PASCHIM MEDINIPUR vs. ITO, WD-2(2) , NOW WARD-39(2), MEDINIPUR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 596/KOL/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 Aug 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Sri Rajesh Kumar & Sonjoy Sarma

Section 40A(3)

section 40A (3) is not to restrict the assessee's genuine business activity.” 7. Thus, in view of the facts of the case and the ratio laid down in the above decisions, we are inclined to set aside the order of Ld. CIT(A) and direct Ld. AO to delete the disallowance

SPML HCIL JV,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD-33(4), KOL, KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 442/KOL/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Dec 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Boradi.T.A. Nos. 441, 442 & 443/Kol/2023 Assessment Years: 2012-2013, 2013-14 & 2014-2015 Spml Hcil Jv,.......................................Appellant Block-A, 3Rd Floor, 22, Camac Street, Kolkata-700016 [Pan: Aadas1471P] -Vs.- Income Tax Officer,.................................Respondent Ward-33(4), Kolkata, 10B, Middleton Row, Kolkata-700071 Appearances By: Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate & Smt. Mita Rizvi, Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri Gautam Patra, Addl. Cit, D.R., Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing : December 12, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : December 13, 2023

Section 143(2)Section 40A(2)(b)

disallowances of Rs.39,94,111/-, Rs.23,86,420/- and Rs.18,40,168/-made with the help of section 40A(2)(b) of the Income

SPML HCIL JV,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD-33(4), KOL, KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 441/KOL/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Dec 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Boradi.T.A. Nos. 441, 442 & 443/Kol/2023 Assessment Years: 2012-2013, 2013-14 & 2014-2015 Spml Hcil Jv,.......................................Appellant Block-A, 3Rd Floor, 22, Camac Street, Kolkata-700016 [Pan: Aadas1471P] -Vs.- Income Tax Officer,.................................Respondent Ward-33(4), Kolkata, 10B, Middleton Row, Kolkata-700071 Appearances By: Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate & Smt. Mita Rizvi, Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri Gautam Patra, Addl. Cit, D.R., Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing : December 12, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : December 13, 2023

Section 143(2)Section 40A(2)(b)

disallowances of Rs.39,94,111/-, Rs.23,86,420/- and Rs.18,40,168/-made with the help of section 40A(2)(b) of the Income

SPML HCIL JV,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD-33(4), KOL, KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 443/KOL/2023[2014-25]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Dec 2023AY 2014-25

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Boradi.T.A. Nos. 441, 442 & 443/Kol/2023 Assessment Years: 2012-2013, 2013-14 & 2014-2015 Spml Hcil Jv,.......................................Appellant Block-A, 3Rd Floor, 22, Camac Street, Kolkata-700016 [Pan: Aadas1471P] -Vs.- Income Tax Officer,.................................Respondent Ward-33(4), Kolkata, 10B, Middleton Row, Kolkata-700071 Appearances By: Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate & Smt. Mita Rizvi, Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri Gautam Patra, Addl. Cit, D.R., Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing : December 12, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : December 13, 2023

Section 143(2)Section 40A(2)(b)

disallowances of Rs.39,94,111/-, Rs.23,86,420/- and Rs.18,40,168/-made with the help of section 40A(2)(b) of the Income

MR. SIDHARTHA SURANA,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD- 36(1), KOLKATA. , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assesee is allowed

ITA 1237/KOL/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata24 Jan 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr.Manish Boradआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.1237/Kol/2024 Assessment Year: 2019-20

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Surana, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Kapil Mondal, Addl. CIT
Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 2Section 250Section 3Section 40ASection 40A(3)Section 5Section 56

disallowance under sub-section (3) of section 40A shall be made and no payment shall be deemed to be the profits