BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

1,972 results for “disallowance”+ Section 40clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai7,378Delhi6,511Chennai2,346Bangalore2,290Kolkata1,972Ahmedabad992Hyderabad716Jaipur678Pune561Indore397Chandigarh310Karnataka249Raipur208Surat208Cochin204Rajkot179Nagpur152Visakhapatnam145Amritsar145Lucknow129Guwahati80Ranchi71Telangana68Panaji66Calcutta65Allahabad65Cuttack60SC57Patna57Jodhpur50Agra42Dehradun34Jabalpur30Kerala30Varanasi9Orissa5Punjab & Haryana5Rajasthan4Gauhati2ANIL R. DAVE AMITAVA ROY L. NAGESWARA RAO1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1J&K1Tripura1Uttarakhand1Himachal Pradesh1H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)72Section 14866Addition to Income57Section 14751Section 80I48Section 4047Disallowance43Deduction35Section 25031Section 68

SOMA RANI GHOSH,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR-49, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1420/KOL/2015[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Sept 2016AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

Section 194CSection 194C(6)Section 194C(7)Section 40

disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) does not arise. Even though it was stated in sub-section 7 that person

ACIT, CIRCLE-49(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. ASHOKE PRASAD, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 582/KOL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata

Showing 1–20 of 1,972 · Page 1 of 99

...
23
Section 143(2)19
Limitation/Time-bar17
26 Oct 2018
AY 2012-13

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am ] I.T.A No. 582/Kol/2017 Assessment Year : 2012-13 Acit, Circle-49(1), Kolkata -Vs- Ashoke Prasad. [Pan: Afqpp 6505 C] (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A No. 611/Kol/2017 Assessment Year : 2012-13 Ashoke Prasad -Vs- Dcit, Circle-49, Kolkata [Pan: Afqpp 6505 C] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri S.M. Surana, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Robin Chowdhury, Addl. CIT Sr. DR
Section 139Section 139(4)Section 201(1)Section 40

disallowance under section 40(a)(ia)of the Act, in our opinion there is violation of section 194C(7) and disallowance

SHREE ASHOKE PRASAD,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-49, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 611/KOL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 Oct 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am ] I.T.A No. 582/Kol/2017 Assessment Year : 2012-13 Acit, Circle-49(1), Kolkata -Vs- Ashoke Prasad. [Pan: Afqpp 6505 C] (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A No. 611/Kol/2017 Assessment Year : 2012-13 Ashoke Prasad -Vs- Dcit, Circle-49, Kolkata [Pan: Afqpp 6505 C] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri S.M. Surana, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Robin Chowdhury, Addl. CIT Sr. DR
Section 139Section 139(4)Section 201(1)Section 40

disallowance under section 40(a)(ia)of the Act, in our opinion there is violation of section 194C(7) and disallowance

M/S GHOSH & CHAKRABORTY TRANSPORT,BURDWAN vs. THE ITO, WD-2(1), ASANSOL, ASANSOL

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 423/KOL/2015[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata12 Apr 2017AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap

Section 194CSection 40

section 40(a)(ia). 4. The disallowance of Rs.29,38,990/- made by the Assessing Officer under section 40(a)(ia) was challenged

M/S POWER MAX (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR-8, KOL., KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 125/KOL/2017[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Jun 2018AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Am & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm] I.T.A. No. 125/Kol/2017 Assessment Year: 2011-12 M/S. Power Max (India) Pvt. Ltd....................................………………………….............Appellant 18A, Park Street, Stephen Court, Kolkata – 700 071. [Pan : Aabcp 9559 R] Dcit Circle 8 Kolkata..………………………………………………………….............Respondent Aayakar Bhawan Poorva, 110, Shanti Pally, 6Th Floor, Kolkata – 700 107. Appearances By: Shri A.N. Chatterjee, Fca Appearing On Behalf Of The Assessee. Shri S. Dasgupta, Addl. Cit (Dr) Appearing On Behalf Of The Revenue. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : April 05, 2018 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : June 15, 2018 Order Per P.M. Jagtap, Am This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Ld. Cit(A) – 18, Kolkata Dated 19.12.2016. 2. At The Time Of Hearing Before The Tribunal, The Learned Counsel For The Assessee Has Not Pressed Ground No 1 Raised In The Appeal Of The Assessee. It Is Also Noted That Ground No 4 Raised By The Assessee In This Appeal In General Which Does Not Call For Specific Adjudication.

Section 143(3)Section 194C(2)Section 194ISection 206ASection 40

disallowed the said amount also under section 40(a)(ia). Thus a total disallowance of Rs. 1,16,51,016/- was made

TAPAS KUMAR SARKAR,BARASAT, NORTH TWENTY FOUR PARGANAS vs. I.T.O., WARD - 50(1),, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1873/KOL/2025[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata23 Oct 2025AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri Udayan Das Gupta & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 147Section 194Section 194CSection 194JSection 250Section 40

Disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia): The learned CIT(A) erred in upholding the disallowance of ₹50,05,666 and 26,24,969 under

TAPAS KUMAR SARKAR,BARASAT, NORTH TWENTY FOUR PARGANAS vs. I.T.O., WARD - 50(1),, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1872/KOL/2025[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata23 Oct 2025AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri Udayan Das Gupta & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 147Section 194Section 194CSection 194JSection 250Section 40

Disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia): The learned CIT(A) erred in upholding the disallowance of ₹50,05,666 and 26,24,969 under

ORIENT PAPER & INDUSTRIES LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. J.C.I.T RANGE - 6,KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal in ITA 430/Kol/2013 of assessee is partly allowed and appeal in ITA 648/Kol/2013 of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 430/KOL/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Aug 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: : Shri P.M.Jagtap & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

For Appellant: Shri Asim Chaudhury, ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Niraj Kumar, CIT, ld.Sr.DR
Section 143(3)Section 14A

disallowing under section 40 (a)(ia) of the Act, the sum of Rs.14,61,956/- being the installment of lease

TAPAN KUMAR DUTTA,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD 2(4), ASANSOL

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 472/KOL/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 Jan 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Vice-

Section 194CSection 194C(6)Section 40

disallowance under section 40(a)(ia)of the Act, in our opinion there is violation of section 194C(7) and disallowance

DEBJYOTI MISHRA,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD-22(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1411/KOL/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 Jan 2017AY 2006-07

Bench: : Shri M.Balaganesh & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi

For Appellant: Shri Miraj D.Shah, ld.ARFor Respondent: Md. Ghyas Uddin, JCIT, ld.DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 148Section 234ASection 40

disallowance towards instrument hire charges for violation of the provisions contemplated under section 194C and made addition by invoking the section 40

I.T.O WD - 8(3),KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S RUIA SONS PVT LTD., KOLKATA

In the result the appeal by the revenue is partly allowed

ITA 365/KOL/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata03 Mar 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Hon’Ble Sri M.Balaganesh, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm] I.T.A No. 365/Kol/2013 Assessment Year : 2009-10 I.T.O., Ward-8(3), -Vs.- M/S. Ruia Sons Pvt. Ltd. Kolkata Kolkata [Pan : Aaccr 3949 Q] (Respondent) (Appellant) For The Appellant : Shri Arup Kumar Sinha, Cit For The Respondent : Shri Manoj Kataruka, Advocate

For Appellant: Shri Arup Kumar Sinha, CITFor Respondent: Shri Manoj Kataruka, Advocate
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 194JSection 301Section 40

disallowance can be made u/s 40(10(ia) of the Act. That in effect the Tribunal analyzing the section 40

MURARILAL MURARKA,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD-61(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 636/KOL/2022[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 May 2025AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 40Section 44A

Section 40(a)(ia), the same is held to be retrospective in nature; therefore, the amount to be disallowed u/s 40

MADHU JAYANTI INTERNATIONAL LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed, while the assessee’s appeal is partly allowed

ITA 1894/KOL/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Feb 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi

Section 195Section 40Section 5(2)(b)Section 9(1)(i)

section 40(a)(i). 4. The disallowance made by the Assessing Officer under section 40(a)(i) on account of commission

LMJ INTERNATIONAL LTD.,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T CIR - 8,KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed, while the appeal of the assessee is treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 230/KOL/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata21 Mar 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

Section 80I

disallowance made by the Assessing Officer under section 40(a)(ia) on account of payment made by the assessee-company

GLOBAL VENTURE CORPORATION,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-49, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 107/KOL/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata03 Apr 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap & Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

Section 194CSection 40

section 201(1) of the Act then no disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act is warranted. 14. Before

DCIT,CC-VII, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S SALTEE INFRASTRUCTURE LTD., KOLKATA

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 856/KOL/2014[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata22 Mar 2017AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri N.V.Vasudevan & Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 194JSection 40

disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act does not arise. However the Revenue is disputing the allowability of the above

ACIT, LTU - 2, KOLKATA , KOLKATA vs. M/S. UCO BANK, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 585/KOL/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata17 Jun 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Vs. M/S Uco Bank Acit, Ltu-2, Kolkata 10, Btm, Sarani, Kolkata – 700001. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaacu3561B .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Vijay Shankar, CITFor Respondent: Shri D. S. Damle, FCA
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 14ASection 211Section 40

disallowance u/s 40(a) (ia) permissible if tax was not at all deducted at the time of payment and deduction of tax but fails to deposit before filing return. Hence, provision of section

DCIT, CEN. CIR-VIII, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S RUPA & CO. LTD., KOLKATA

ITA 149/KOL/2014[2007-2008]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata12 Aug 2016AY 2007-2008

Bench: Hon’Ble Sri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Dr.Arjun Lal Saini, Am] I.T.A No. 149/Kol/2014 Assessment Year : 2007-08 D.C.I.T., Central Circle-Viii, -Vs.- M/S. Rupa & Co. Ltd. Kolkata Kolkata [Pan : Aabcr 2648 M] (Respondent) (Appellant) For The Appellant : Shri G.Mallikarjuna, Cit(Dr) For The Respondent : Shri A.K.Tulsiyan, Fca Date Of Hearing : 09.08.2016. Date Of Pronouncement : 12.08.2016. Order Per N.V.Vasudevan, Jm

For Appellant: Shri G.Mallikarjuna, CIT(DR)For Respondent: Shri A.K.Tulsiyan, FCA
Section 143(3)Section 194JSection 194J(1)Section 40

section 40(a)(ia). In view of the above, the disallowance of Rs.1,44,15,452/- by applying section 40

DCIT, CIRCLE - 6(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. INTEGRATED COAL MINING LIMITED, KOLKATA

Appeal is partly allowed in above terms

ITA 170/KOL/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Mar 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Sainiassessment Year :2010-11 Dcit, Circle-6(1), V/S. M/S Integrated Coal P-7, Chowringhee Mining Ltd., 6, Church Square, Kolkata-69 Lane, 1Ste Floor, Kolakta-700001 [Pan No.Aaaci 5584 L] .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Dr. P.K. Srihari, Cit-Dr अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/By Appellant Shri Diparun Mukherjee, Aca & ""यथ" क" ओर से/By Respondent Shri Alolk Goenka, Aca 15-01-2019 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing 15-03-2019 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement

Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 43B

disallowance made under section 14A r.w. Rule 8D. The facts for the year under consideration is identical with the facts of assessment year 2008-09 as follows: During the year under consideration, the company earned dividend income from the following source: Particulars Amount (Rs.) CESC Ltd 30,40

DCIT, CIRCLE - 11(1), KOLKATA , KOLKATA vs. M/S. DEY'S MEDICAL (U.P.) PVT. LTD., , KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed

ITA 1703/KOL/2018[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 Nov 2023AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2005-06

For Appellant: Shri P. P. Barman, Addl. CIT, Sr. DRFor Respondent: Shri J. P. Khaitan, Sr. Advocate & Shri P
Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 40Section 44A

disallowed by applying section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of tax at source. Details of the said expenses are tabulated