BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

14 results for “disallowance”+ Section 35Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai20Kolkata14Delhi14Ranchi13Hyderabad12Jaipur11Chennai10Bangalore8Lucknow4Ahmedabad4SC3Indore3Pune1Cochin1Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 35E28Section 35D14Disallowance12Addition to Income12Reopening of Assessment7Deduction7Section 37(1)4Section 271(1)(c)4Section 32(1)(iia)4Section 40A(9)

M/S. BENGAL EMTA COAL MINES LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - XVI, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 361/KOL/2011[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata17 Nov 2017AY 2006-07

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri J.Sudhakar Reddy, Am & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi, Jm ]

For Appellant: Shri Satish Khosla, Advocate & Shri Manish Khosla AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri David Z.Chowngth, Addl. CIT(DR)
Section 148Section 28Section 35E

sections. 35E and 28/37 of the Act. The CIT(A) has relied on irrelevant consideration and therefore, the order requires to be set aside and the claim of the appellant or the claim allowable under the Act has to be allowed. 5. That the appellant craves leave to add, to alter, to amendments and or withdraw any of the above

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-5, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S HINDUSTAN COPPER LTD., KOLKATA

4
Section 40A(3)4
Depreciation4

In the result, Revenue’s appeal stands dismissed

ITA 2583/KOL/2013[2007-2008]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Dec 2016AY 2007-2008

Bench: Shri N.V.Vasudevan & Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year :2007-08

Section 143(3)Section 35D

section 35E of the Act and accordingly allowed one tenth of such expenditure and disallowed the remaining expenditure as claimed

THE BISRA STONE LIME CO LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-5, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1892/KOL/2016[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata14 Feb 2018AY 2003-04

Bench: Hon’Ble Sri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Am] I.T.A No. 1892/Kol/2016 Assessment Year : 2003-04

For Appellant: Shri T.P.Kar, ARFor Respondent: Shri Arindam Bhattacharjee, Addl. CIT
Section 271(1)(c)Section 35ESection 35E(4)(b)

section 35E of the Act an assessee which is an Indian company if it incurs expenses in connection with 2 The Bisra Stone Lime Co. Ltd. A.Yr.2003-04 prospecting, extraction or production of any mineral after 31st day of March, 1970 till achieving commercial production then such an assessee will be entitled to deduction of all expenses incurred

JCIT(OSD), CIRCLE -5, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S HINDUSTHAN COPPER LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 823/KOL/2012[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata22 Apr 2024AY 2003-04

Bench: SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, HON’BLE (Accountant Member), SHRI SONJOY SARMA, HON’BLE (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri S. Bhattacharya, ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhijit Kundu, CIT
Section 35DSection 35ESection 37(1)

disallowances of expenditure of Rs. 41,34,95,000/- shown under the head “Mine Development Expenditure” without considering the applicability of section 35E

JCIT(OSD), CIRCLE -5, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S HINDUSTHAN COPPER LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 824/KOL/2012[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata22 Apr 2024AY 2004-05

Bench: SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, HON’BLE (Accountant Member), SHRI SONJOY SARMA, HON’BLE (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri S. Bhattacharya, ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhijit Kundu, CIT
Section 35DSection 35ESection 37(1)

disallowances of expenditure of Rs. 41,34,95,000/- shown under the head “Mine Development Expenditure” without considering the applicability of section 35E

JCIT(OSD),CIRCLE-5, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S HINDUSTHAN COPPER LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 822/KOL/2012[2002-2003]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata22 Apr 2024AY 2002-2003

Bench: SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, HON’BLE (Accountant Member), SHRI SONJOY SARMA, HON’BLE (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri S. Bhattacharya, ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhijit Kundu, CIT
Section 35DSection 35ESection 37(1)

disallowances of expenditure of Rs. 41,34,95,000/- shown under the head “Mine Development Expenditure” without considering the applicability of section 35E

DCIT, CIRCLE -5 KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S HINDUSTHAN COPPER LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 893/KOL/2012[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata22 Apr 2024AY 2008-2009

Bench: SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, HON’BLE (Accountant Member), SHRI SONJOY SARMA, HON’BLE (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri S. Bhattacharya, ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhijit Kundu, CIT
Section 35DSection 35ESection 37(1)

disallowances of expenditure of Rs. 41,34,95,000/- shown under the head “Mine Development Expenditure” without considering the applicability of section 35E

DCIT, CIR-2, ASANSOL, ASANSOL vs. M/S EASTERN COALFIELS LTD., BURDWAN

In the result, this ground of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1015/KOL/2015[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Jan 2019AY 2009-2010

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Sri A. T. Varkeyi.T.A. No. 1010/Kol/2015 Assessment Year: 2009-10 Eastern Coalfields Ltd....................………………..…………….………………………………..………Assessee [Pan :Aaace 7590 E] Jcit, R-2, Asansol………………..…………………………………………………….……………………....Revenue &

Section 32(1)(iia)Section 35ESection 40A(3)Section 40A(9)

35E, disallowance of expenditure on account of donation and allowability of expenditure u/s 40A(9), u/s 40A(3) of the Act arise in the appeal. Other miscellaneous issues, also arise for our adjudication in these appeals. 3. We have heard Shri Arvind Agarwal, the ld. Counsel for the assessee and Shri P. K. Srihari, the ld. CIT-DR, on behalf

ACIT, CIRCLE-2, ASANSOL, ASANSOL vs. M/S EASTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED, BURDWAN

In the result, this ground of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 999/KOL/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Jan 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Sri A. T. Varkeyi.T.A. No. 1010/Kol/2015 Assessment Year: 2009-10 Eastern Coalfields Ltd....................………………..…………….………………………………..………Assessee [Pan :Aaace 7590 E] Jcit, R-2, Asansol………………..…………………………………………………….……………………....Revenue &

Section 32(1)(iia)Section 35ESection 40A(3)Section 40A(9)

35E, disallowance of expenditure on account of donation and allowability of expenditure u/s 40A(9), u/s 40A(3) of the Act arise in the appeal. Other miscellaneous issues, also arise for our adjudication in these appeals. 3. We have heard Shri Arvind Agarwal, the ld. Counsel for the assessee and Shri P. K. Srihari, the ld. CIT-DR, on behalf

EASTERN COALFIELDS LTD.,BURDWAN vs. JCIT, R-2, ASANSOL, ASANSOL

In the result, this ground of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1010/KOL/2015[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Jan 2019AY 2009-2010

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Sri A. T. Varkeyi.T.A. No. 1010/Kol/2015 Assessment Year: 2009-10 Eastern Coalfields Ltd....................………………..…………….………………………………..………Assessee [Pan :Aaace 7590 E] Jcit, R-2, Asansol………………..…………………………………………………….……………………....Revenue &

Section 32(1)(iia)Section 35ESection 40A(3)Section 40A(9)

35E, disallowance of expenditure on account of donation and allowability of expenditure u/s 40A(9), u/s 40A(3) of the Act arise in the appeal. Other miscellaneous issues, also arise for our adjudication in these appeals. 3. We have heard Shri Arvind Agarwal, the ld. Counsel for the assessee and Shri P. K. Srihari, the ld. CIT-DR, on behalf

EASTERN COALFILELDS LTD.,,BURDWAN vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2,, ASANSOL

In the result, this ground of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 916/KOL/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Jan 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Sri A. T. Varkeyi.T.A. No. 1010/Kol/2015 Assessment Year: 2009-10 Eastern Coalfields Ltd....................………………..…………….………………………………..………Assessee [Pan :Aaace 7590 E] Jcit, R-2, Asansol………………..…………………………………………………….……………………....Revenue &

Section 32(1)(iia)Section 35ESection 40A(3)Section 40A(9)

35E, disallowance of expenditure on account of donation and allowability of expenditure u/s 40A(9), u/s 40A(3) of the Act arise in the appeal. Other miscellaneous issues, also arise for our adjudication in these appeals. 3. We have heard Shri Arvind Agarwal, the ld. Counsel for the assessee and Shri P. K. Srihari, the ld. CIT-DR, on behalf

ACIT, CIRCLE-2, ASANSOL, ASANSOL vs. M/S. EASTERN COALFIELDS LTD.,

In the result, ITA No. 1636/Kol/2014 (Revenue’s appeal) is dismissed, ITA No

ITA 1637/KOL/2014[2006-2007]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 Jul 2017AY 2006-2007

Bench: "ी ऐ. ट". वक", "यायीक सद"य एवं/And डॉ. अजु"न लाल सैनी, लेखा सद"य) [Before Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am]

Section 35E

35E. 3. That the Ld. CIT(A), Asansol has erred in law that the order of reassessment is bad in law since the prescribed procedure is not followed. Accordingly cancelled the order of re- assessment made by AO. and deleting the addition of Rs.1,71 ,40,000/- made by the AO on account of disallowance under the head royalty

ACIT, CIRCLE-2, ASANSOL, ASANSOL vs. M/S. EASTERN COALFIELDS LTD.,

In the result, ITA No. 1636/Kol/2014 (Revenue’s appeal) is dismissed, ITA No

ITA 1636/KOL/2014[2005-2006]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 Jul 2017AY 2005-2006

Bench: "ी ऐ. ट". वक", "यायीक सद"य एवं/And डॉ. अजु"न लाल सैनी, लेखा सद"य) [Before Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am]

Section 35E

35E. 3. That the Ld. CIT(A), Asansol has erred in law that the order of reassessment is bad in law since the prescribed procedure is not followed. Accordingly cancelled the order of re- assessment made by AO. and deleting the addition of Rs.1,71 ,40,000/- made by the AO on account of disallowance under the head royalty

EASTERN COALFILELDS LTD. vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2, ASANSOL, ASANSOL

In the result, ITA No. 1636/Kol/2014 (Revenue’s appeal) is dismissed, ITA No

ITA 1654/KOL/2014[2006-2007]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 Jul 2017AY 2006-2007

Bench: "ी ऐ. ट". वक", "यायीक सद"य एवं/And डॉ. अजु"न लाल सैनी, लेखा सद"य) [Before Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am]

Section 35E

35E. 3. That the Ld. CIT(A), Asansol has erred in law that the order of reassessment is bad in law since the prescribed procedure is not followed. Accordingly cancelled the order of re- assessment made by AO. and deleting the addition of Rs.1,71 ,40,000/- made by the AO on account of disallowance under the head royalty