BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “disallowance”+ Section 29Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi61Mumbai25Bangalore14Indore9Pune7Jaipur6Chennai6Kolkata4Surat2Rajkot2SC2Ahmedabad2Ranchi1Hyderabad1Nagpur1Chandigarh1

Key Topics

Section 1315Section 2634Addition to Income4Section 142(1)3Section 143(3)3Section 103Section 14A2Section 1392Section 10(25)2Unexplained Cash Credit

ACIT, CIRCLE - 7(1) , KOLKATA vs. M/S. BRITANNIA INDUSTRIES LTD., , KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 2644/KOL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata27 Oct 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Shri N.S. Saini, A/RFor Respondent: Shri Abhijit Kundu, CIT, D/R and Shri G
Section 115Section 143(2)Section 14ASection 250Section 92C

disallowance. Accordingly Ground No. 2 raised by the revenue is dismissed. 15. Ground No. 3 of the revenue relates to VAT subsidy of Rs.23.89 Crores which has been held by the Assessing Officer as revenue I.T.A. No. 2644/Kol/2018 Assessment Year: 2014-15 C.O. No. 09/Kol/2020 Assessment Year: 2014-15 M/s. Britannia Industries 14 receipt but the ld. CIT(A) deleted

2
Deduction2

MAYURAKSHI GRAMIN BANK EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND, PBGB REGIONAL, ,SURI, BIRBHUM vs. D.C.I.T., CIRCLE - 3, SURI, SURI, BIRBHUM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1159/KOL/2024[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 Jan 2025AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Vice-(Kz) I.T.A. No. 1159/Kol/2024 Assessment Year: 2015-2016 Mayurakshi Gramin Bank Employees Provident Fund,………………………………………Appellant Pbgb Regional, Suri Birbhum-731101, West Bengal [Pan:Aabtm2580Q] -Vs.- Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax,……...Respondent Circle-3, Suri, Aayakar Bhawan, Lalkuthipara, Suri, Birbhum-731101, W.B. Appearances By: Shri S.K. Tulsian, Advocate & Ms. Lata Goyal, Ca, Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri Subhro Das, Addl. Cit, Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing: January 23, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order: January 31, 2025 O R D E R

Section 10Section 10(25)Section 10(25)(ii)Section 139Section 143(3)Section 254

disallowed in assessment year 2013-14. The said issue came up before the ITAT for assessment year 2013-14, wherein the assesese raised alternative plea of its correct taxable income for the first time and, therefore, the matter was restored back to the file of ld. Assessing Officer. The ld. Assessing Officer did not accept the plea of the assessee

AUTUMN BUILDERS LIMITED. ,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WD-1(1),KOLKATA. , KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 883/KOL/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata11 Dec 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar&Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 131Section 142(1)

disallowance is made u/s 14A prior to AY 2022-23 as the explanation to Section 14A vide Finance Act, 2022 w.e.f 01.04.2022 is prospective and not retrospective. 9 I.T.A. No.883/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2012-13 Autumn Builders Ltd. Accordingly we set aside the order of Ld. CIT(A) on this issue and direct the AO to delete the addition. The ground

BRILLANT VINCOM LLP (SUCCESSOR OF BRILLANT VINCOM PVT. LTD.,),KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD 37(1), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 282/KOL/2025[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata22 Jul 2025AY 2015-2016

Bench: IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH: KOLKATA श्री प्रदीप कुमार चौबे, न्यायिक सदस्य एवं श्री संजय अवस्थी, लेखा सटस्य के समक्ष [BeforeShri Pradip Kumar Choubey (Judicial Member), Shri Sanjay Awasthi (Accountant Member)

Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 14ASection 263Section 68

Section 263 of the Act and loss of Rs. 25,70,300/- from sale of shares is disallowed and added to the total income of the assessee. Further an amount of Rs. 4,08,75,800/- has also been treated as unexplained cash credit u/s 68 of the Act. 4. Aggrieved by the said order, the assessee preferred an appeal