BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

137 results for “disallowance”+ Section 209clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi815Mumbai806Chennai289Bangalore224Kolkata137Ahmedabad106Jaipur84Hyderabad63Chandigarh49Indore37Lucknow36Pune35Cochin34Raipur32Cuttack19Surat18Rajkot16Allahabad16Nagpur14SC10Jodhpur7Panaji6Ranchi5Dehradun5Guwahati5Kerala5Varanasi4Karnataka4Visakhapatnam2Himachal Pradesh2Punjab & Haryana2Rajasthan2Jabalpur1H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1Amritsar1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)83Section 26359Addition to Income55Disallowance50Deduction46Section 14A34Section 4029Section 6826Section 35(1)(ii)22Section 10(38)

D.C.I.T CIR - 10,KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S PHILLIPS CARBON BLACK LTD, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of Revenue in ITA 2123/Kol/13 and ITA

ITA 2123/KOL/2013[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata12 Aug 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: : Shri P.M.Jagtap & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

For Appellant: Shri D.S.Damle, FCA, ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Kalyan Nath, JCIT, Sr.DR
Section 10Section 14Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14A

209/-. The said return was processed determining at loss. Thereafter, on scrutiny the notices u/s. 143(2)/142(1) were issued. In response to which, the ld.A/Rs of the assessee appeared and submitted all the details including the books of accounts and information as called for before the AO. During the assessment proceedings u/s. 143(3) the AO found that

Showing 1–20 of 137 · Page 1 of 7

19
Section 115J19
Transfer Pricing14

ALLAHABAD BANK,KOLKATA vs. ADD.CIT,RANGE-6, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1199/KOL/2012[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata01 Jun 2016AY 2008-2009

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am ] Assessment Year : 2008-09

For Appellant: Shri Barun Kumar Ghosh & Shri Piyush Dey, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Rajat Subhra Biswas, CIT(DR)
Section 28Section 36Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(viia)

section 115JB of the Act are not applicable in the nationalised bank, we are of the view that there is no merit in Ground No.4 raised by the revenue and the same is dismissed. 48. Ground No.5 raised by the revenue reads as follows :- “5. That on the facts and circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT(A) erred

LMJ INTERNATIONAL LTD.,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T CIR - 8,KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed, while the appeal of the assessee is treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 230/KOL/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata21 Mar 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

Section 80I

209 Taxman 65] the amount, which was set apart as a debenture redemption reserve is not a reserve I.T.A. Nos. 230 & 340/KOL/2013 Assessment year: 2009-2010 Page 14 of 16 within the meaning of Explanation below to section 115JA of the Income Tax Act, 1961. We, therefore, find no infirmity in the impugned order of the ld. CIT(Appeals) deleting

JCIT, (OSD), CIR-4(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S M. K. SHAH EXPORTS LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 1275/KOL/2016[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata17 Aug 2018AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.506 & 507/Kol/2017 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2009-10& 2010-11) M/S. M. K. Shah Exports Ltd. Vs. D.C.I.T, Circle-4, Kolkata

For Appellant: Shri S. Jhajharia, ARFor Respondent: ShriSanjay Paul & Saurabh Kumar, Addl. CIT (Sr.DR)
Section 143(3)Section 14A

disallowance made u/s 14A to the book profit computed by the Assessee. M/s. M. K. Shah Exports Ltd. Revenue-ITA Nos.1274 & 1275/Kol/2016,andAssessee- 506 & 507/Kol/2016 Assessment Years: 2009-10 & 2010-11 (ii). Ground No.2 raised by the Revenue in ITA No.1274/Kol/2016, for Assessment Year 2009-10 relates to issue of addition of Rs.10,24,804/- on account of income

M. K. SHAH EXPORTS LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR-4, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 507/KOL/2016[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata17 Aug 2018AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.506 & 507/Kol/2017 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2009-10& 2010-11) M/S. M. K. Shah Exports Ltd. Vs. D.C.I.T, Circle-4, Kolkata

For Appellant: Shri S. Jhajharia, ARFor Respondent: ShriSanjay Paul & Saurabh Kumar, Addl. CIT (Sr.DR)
Section 143(3)Section 14A

disallowance made u/s 14A to the book profit computed by the Assessee. M/s. M. K. Shah Exports Ltd. Revenue-ITA Nos.1274 & 1275/Kol/2016,andAssessee- 506 & 507/Kol/2016 Assessment Years: 2009-10 & 2010-11 (ii). Ground No.2 raised by the Revenue in ITA No.1274/Kol/2016, for Assessment Year 2009-10 relates to issue of addition of Rs.10,24,804/- on account of income

M. K. SHAH EXPORTS LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR-4, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 506/KOL/2016[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata17 Aug 2018AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.506 & 507/Kol/2017 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2009-10& 2010-11) M/S. M. K. Shah Exports Ltd. Vs. D.C.I.T, Circle-4, Kolkata

For Appellant: Shri S. Jhajharia, ARFor Respondent: ShriSanjay Paul & Saurabh Kumar, Addl. CIT (Sr.DR)
Section 143(3)Section 14A

disallowance made u/s 14A to the book profit computed by the Assessee. M/s. M. K. Shah Exports Ltd. Revenue-ITA Nos.1274 & 1275/Kol/2016,andAssessee- 506 & 507/Kol/2016 Assessment Years: 2009-10 & 2010-11 (ii). Ground No.2 raised by the Revenue in ITA No.1274/Kol/2016, for Assessment Year 2009-10 relates to issue of addition of Rs.10,24,804/- on account of income

JCIT, (OSD), CIR-4(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S M. K. SHAH EXPORTS LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 1274/KOL/2016[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata17 Aug 2018AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.506 & 507/Kol/2017 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2009-10& 2010-11) M/S. M. K. Shah Exports Ltd. Vs. D.C.I.T, Circle-4, Kolkata

For Appellant: Shri S. Jhajharia, ARFor Respondent: ShriSanjay Paul & Saurabh Kumar, Addl. CIT (Sr.DR)
Section 143(3)Section 14A

disallowance made u/s 14A to the book profit computed by the Assessee. M/s. M. K. Shah Exports Ltd. Revenue-ITA Nos.1274 & 1275/Kol/2016,andAssessee- 506 & 507/Kol/2016 Assessment Years: 2009-10 & 2010-11 (ii). Ground No.2 raised by the Revenue in ITA No.1274/Kol/2016, for Assessment Year 2009-10 relates to issue of addition of Rs.10,24,804/- on account of income

DHARAM CHAND CHAUDHRY,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 33, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1220/KOL/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Oct 2015AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Shri M. Balaganesh, Am]

For Appellant: Md. Ghayas Uddin, JCIT, Sr. DRFor Respondent: Dr. Bishnu Sankar Kundu, FCA
Section 143(3)Section 194ASection 194CSection 40

209), was categorically rejected by Their Lordships, and Their Lordships observed as follows: “In our view, section 195(2) is based on the “principle of proportionality”. The said sub-section gets attracted only in cases where the payment made is a composite payment in which a certain proportion of payment has an element of “income” chargeable to tax in India

M/S R. PIYARELALL IRON & STEEL (P) LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR-3, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1414/KOL/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata11 May 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: "ी जे. सुधाकर रे"डी, लेखा सद"य एवं/And "ी ऐ. ट". वक", "यायीक सद"य) [Before Shri J. Sudhakar Reddy, Am & Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

Section 142(1)

209/-and Rs.2,62,667/- are concerned, we set aside the order of the Ld. CIT(A) and remand the matter back to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) to adjudicate the issue afresh after giving opportunity to the assessee and thereafter pass speaking order in the light of the observations made above. 9. Ground no. 4 is against

BHARGAB ENGINEERING WORKS,HOWRAH vs. PCIT, CENTRAL KOLKATA 2, , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1161/KOL/2025[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 Nov 2025AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 263

209 (SC)[17-09-1992] the object and purpose of the proceedings under section 147 which are for the benefit of the revenue and not an assessee. Since the delayed payment on account of employees’ contribution towards PF and ESI was not to be deducted under section 36(1)(va) in view of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme

TM INTERNATIONAL LOGISTICS LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR. 8(1) , KOLKATA

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 528/KOL/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Jan 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2012-13 & Assessment Year: 2013-14 & Assessment Year: 2016-17

For Appellant: Shri Nageswar Rao, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri P. P. Barman, Addl. CIT
Section 143(3)Section 194JSection 201Section 40Section 9(1)

disallowance of the additional royalty payable to KOPT made by the Ld. AO by invoking the provisions of section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. T M International Logistics Ltd., AYs 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2016-17 5. Ld. Counsel for the assessee referred to second proviso to section 40(a)(ia) inserted by the Finance Act, 2012 w.e.f

TM INTERNATIONAL LOGISTICS LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR. 8(1) , KOLKATA

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 527/KOL/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Jan 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2012-13 & Assessment Year: 2013-14 & Assessment Year: 2016-17

For Appellant: Shri Nageswar Rao, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri P. P. Barman, Addl. CIT
Section 143(3)Section 194JSection 201Section 40Section 9(1)

disallowance of the additional royalty payable to KOPT made by the Ld. AO by invoking the provisions of section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. T M International Logistics Ltd., AYs 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2016-17 5. Ld. Counsel for the assessee referred to second proviso to section 40(a)(ia) inserted by the Finance Act, 2012 w.e.f

TM INTERNATIONAL LOGISTICS LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR. 8(1), KOLKATA

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 487/KOL/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Jan 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2012-13 & Assessment Year: 2013-14 & Assessment Year: 2016-17

For Appellant: Shri Nageswar Rao, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri P. P. Barman, Addl. CIT
Section 143(3)Section 194JSection 201Section 40Section 9(1)

disallowance of the additional royalty payable to KOPT made by the Ld. AO by invoking the provisions of section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. T M International Logistics Ltd., AYs 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2016-17 5. Ld. Counsel for the assessee referred to second proviso to section 40(a)(ia) inserted by the Finance Act, 2012 w.e.f

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-10, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S VISHAL RETAIL LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result the appeal filed by the Revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2627/KOL/2013[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Mar 2017AY 2008-2009

Bench: Sri Aby T.Varkeyand Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 43B

209 and 214 to 217. As the impugned amount does not pertain to the year under consideration, therefore, the same cannot be disallowed under the provisions of Section

GIFFORD & PARTNERS LTD.(SINCE MERGED WITH GIFFORD LLP),KOLKATA vs. DDIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION - 1(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result ITA No.1489/Kol/11 is partly allowed

ITA 2082/KOL/2010[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata06 Apr 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Am] Assessment Year : 2007-08

For Appellant: Shri S.K.Agarwal, FCAFor Respondent: Shri G.Mallikarjuna, CIT (DR)
Section 143(3)Section 144C

Section 198 & 199 of the Act. In view of this legal position, the difference amount of Rs. 37,33,151 was correctly added by the AO to the total income of the assessee.” 42. The AO passed the fair order of assessment dated 21.9.2010 giving effect to the directions of the DRP. Aggrieved by the order of the AO dated

GIFFORD & PARTNERS LTD.(SINCE MERGED WITH GIFFORD LLP),KOLKATA vs. ADIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) - 1(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result ITA No.1489/Kol/11 is partly allowed

ITA 1489/KOL/2011[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata06 Apr 2016AY 2005-06

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Am] Assessment Year : 2007-08

For Appellant: Shri S.K.Agarwal, FCAFor Respondent: Shri G.Mallikarjuna, CIT (DR)
Section 143(3)Section 144C

Section 198 & 199 of the Act. In view of this legal position, the difference amount of Rs. 37,33,151 was correctly added by the AO to the total income of the assessee.” 42. The AO passed the fair order of assessment dated 21.9.2010 giving effect to the directions of the DRP. Aggrieved by the order of the AO dated

M/S. HINDUSTHAN NATIONAL GLASS & INDUSTRIES LTD., ,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T, CIRCLE - 5(2), , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 515/KOL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 Dec 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.515/Kol/2019 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14)

For Appellant: Shri D.S. Damle, FCAFor Respondent: Smt. Ranu Biswas, Addl. CIT
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14A

209/-. During the financial year, the assessee company engaged in the business of manufacturing financial year, the assessee company engaged in the business of manufacturing financial year, the assessee company engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling of Glass Bottles & containers, printing of bottles, manufacturing of and selling of Glass Bottles & containers, printing of bottles, manufacturing of and selling

KANAK CHAKRABORTY ,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE - 43, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for AY 2012-13 &

ITA 2351/KOL/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata06 Jun 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav & Sri Manish Borad

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 3Section 3aSection 40ASection 40A(3)Section 44A

Section 145A of the Act and the method of valuing closing stock at cost as per the settled accounting principles, we find no infirmity in the finding of the ld. CIT(A) and the same is confirmed. Hence, ground no. 2 raised by the assessee is dismissed. 9. Ground no. 3 is general in nature which need no adjudication

KANAK CHAKRABORTY ,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE - 43, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for AY 2012-13 &

ITA 2352/KOL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata06 Jun 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav & Sri Manish Borad

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 3Section 3aSection 40ASection 40A(3)Section 44A

Section 145A of the Act and the method of valuing closing stock at cost as per the settled accounting principles, we find no infirmity in the finding of the ld. CIT(A) and the same is confirmed. Hence, ground no. 2 raised by the assessee is dismissed. 9. Ground no. 3 is general in nature which need no adjudication

SHREE KRISHNA GOSWAMI ,KOLKATA vs. PRINCIPAL CIT - 2, KOLKATA , KOLKATA

Appeal is allowed

ITA 1097/KOL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 Dec 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri J. Sudhakar Reddy, Am & S. S. Godara, Jm आयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A No.1097/Kol/2018 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14) Shree Krishna Goswami Vs. Pr. Cit -2, Kolkata C/O Subash Agarwal & Associates, Siddha Gibson, 1, Gibson Lane, 2Nd Floor, Suite213, Kolkata – 700069. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aeopg4309Q (Appellant) .. (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Subash Agarwal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A. K. Nayak, CIT(DR)
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 194CSection 263Section 263(1)Section 40

disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) not be made as the assessee has not deducted tax at source under section 194 C from these payments. The stand of the assessee was that these payments are made to non -resident airlines, and, therefore, following the rationale of circular no. 723 which lays down that no taxes are required to be deducted