BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “disallowance”+ Section 206Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi66Mumbai40Telangana14Ahmedabad14Jaipur12Kolkata9Indore7Chandigarh4Guwahati4Bangalore3Varanasi2Nagpur2Raipur2Chennai2Cochin2Hyderabad2Jodhpur1Rajkot1Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)13Section 26311Section 4011Addition to Income8Section 40A(3)5Deduction5Disallowance4Section 43B3Section 1443TDS

SRI MALAY MONDAL,BURDWAN vs. I.T.O WD - 2(2),ASANSOL, ASANSOL

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 903/KOL/2013[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 Sept 2016AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi

Section 133(6)Section 143(2)Section 40A(3)

Section 40(A)(3) of the Act and disallowed of ₹2,15,47,820/- and added it to the total income of the assessee. The Ld CIT(A) confirmed the action of AO. Before the Tribunal, the Ld.AR of the assesse therein contended that the Assessee is Authorized Retailer Agent (franchise) of country sprit of West Bengal Government under Bengal

KAJORA PACHAI & C.S. SHOP,BURDWAN vs. ITO, WARD - 1(3), DURGAPUR, BURDWAN

In the result, assessee’s appeal stands allowed

ITA 1198/KOL/2011[2008-09]Status: Disposed
3
Section 115J2
Section 14A2
ITAT Kolkata
22 Jun 2016
AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Raviassessment Year :2008-09

Section 143(3)Section 144Section 40Section 40A(3)

Section 40(A)(3) of the Act. The AO also observed that the case of assessee does not fall under the exceptions provided in clause 6DD of income Tax Rules of the IT Rules 1962. Therefore, he has disallowed a sum of ₹ 73,48,251/- and added it to the total income of the assessee. 4. Matter was carried before

SHRI PRABIR KUMAR MULLICK,BURDWAN vs. ITO, WARD - 3(1), ASANSOL, ASANSOL

In the result, assessee’s appeal stands allowed

ITA 1603/KOL/2011[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata01 Jun 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Raviassessment Year :2008-09 Prabir Kumar Mullick V/S. Income Tax Officer, Searsol C.S.Shop, Ward-3(1), G.T. Road Shisubagan (Kalali Gali) (West), Asansol Ranigunj (Burdwan) [Pan No.Ajepm 7142 G] .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

Section 143(3)Section 144Section 255(3)Section 260ASection 40A(3)

Section 40(A)(3) of the Act. The AO also observed that the case of assessee does not fall under the exceptions provided in clause 6 DD of income Tax Rules of the IT Rules 1962. Therefore, he has disallowed a sum of ₹2,15,47,820/- and added it to the total income of the assessee. 8. Matter

BHAGYA LAKHI ROY (PROP), BIJOY NARAYAN ROY (DECD),BURDWAN vs. ITO, WARD - 3(1), ASANSOL, ASANSOL

In the result, assessee’s appeal stands allowed

ITA 1602/KOL/2011[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata01 Jun 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Raviassessment Year :2008-09

Section 143(3)Section 144Section 40Section 40A(3)

Section 40(A)(3) of the Act. The AO also observed that the case of assessee does not fall under the exceptions provided in clause 6DD of income Tax Rules of the IT Rules 1962. Therefore, he has disallowed a sum of ₹2,15,47,820/- and added it to the total income of the assessee. 4. Matter was carried

M/S INDUSTRIAL PERFORATION INDIA (P) LTD,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O. WD - 5(4),KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 413/KOL/2013[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata24 May 2016AY 2005-06

Bench: : Shri P.M. Jagtap & Shri S.S Viswanethra Ravi

For Appellant: Shri Subash Agarwal, Advocate, ARFor Respondent: Shri S.M Das, JCIT, Sr.DR
Section 143(2)Section 147Section 194JSection 200Section 234BSection 40

206C relating to TCS for clarifying the deemed date of discharge of tax liability by the buyer or licensee or lessee. These amendments will take effect from 1st July, 2012. ll. Disallowance of business expenditure on account of non-deduction of tax on payment to resident payee. A related issue to the above is the disallowance under section

PRASHANT IMPEX PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. PCIT-3, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 716/KOL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata01 Aug 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am ] I.T.A No. 716/Kol/2017 Assessment Year : 2012-13 Prashant Impex Pvt. Ltd. -Vs- Pr. Cit-3, Kolkata [Pan: Aabcp 5328 A] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Vinod Kumar Jain, ARFor Respondent: Shri P.K. Srihari, CIT DR
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 14ASection 263Section 263(1)Section 43B

disallowed and added back. Omission to do so resulted in under assessment of income of Rs. 1,14,270/-.” 5. The assessee stated that there were clerical errors in the Notes to Accounts in Point No. 2.6. related to ‘Revenue Recognition’ wherein it was mentioned as under:- ‘Sales are recognized , net of returns and trade discounts, on transfer of significant

BANSILAL LEISURE PARKS LTD,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O (TDS) 57(2),KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 506/KOL/2013[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata19 Apr 2016AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 206(6)Section 206CSection 206C(6)Section 206C(7)

Section 206C(6A) of the Act. 3.1 Facts of the case are that assessee is a Private Limited Company and engaged in the wholesale business of timbers. During the course of assessment proceedings, AO found that assessee has made sale of the timbers to various parties but failed to collect TCS in terms of the provisions of the Sec.206C

M/S ITC LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. CIT, KOLKATA-III, KOLKATA

In the result, all the three appeals of assessee are allowed

ITA 684/KOL/2014[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata03 Feb 2016AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri N.V.Vasusdevan & Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year :2009-10 Assessment Year: 2008-09 Assessment Year: 2007-08

Section 143(3)Section 244ASection 263Section 43B

disallowing interest income on excess dividend distribution tax paid. Any such excess tax paid has to be refunded together with interest under section 244A, as rightly granted by the Assessing Officer. 7. For that on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Commissioner of Income Tax erred in assuming jurisdiction u/s. 263 of the Act when

I.T.C LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. C.I.T KOL - III,KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, all the three appeals of assessee are allowed

ITA 1027/KOL/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata03 Feb 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri N.V.Vasusdevan & Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year :2009-10 Assessment Year: 2008-09 Assessment Year: 2007-08

Section 143(3)Section 244ASection 263Section 43B

disallowing interest income on excess dividend distribution tax paid. Any such excess tax paid has to be refunded together with interest under section 244A, as rightly granted by the Assessing Officer. 7. For that on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Commissioner of Income Tax erred in assuming jurisdiction u/s. 263 of the Act when