BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “disallowance”+ Section 1Oclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai45Delhi32Chennai11Bangalore8Hyderabad8Ahmedabad6Kolkata5Indore4Cuttack4Cochin1Allahabad1Jodhpur1Karnataka1

Key Topics

Section 80I9Section 10B7Section 10A4Disallowance4Deduction3Section 1482Addition to Income2

ACIT, CIRCLE-34, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S BANWARILALL PASARI, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue for A

ITA 2114/KOL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata14 Mar 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Am & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm] I.T.A. No. 2114 & 2115/Kol/2016 Assessment Years: 2012-13 & 2013-14 Acit Cir 34..............................………………………...........................................................Appellant Aayakar Bhawan, Poorva, 7Th Floor, 110, Shantipally, Kolkata – 107. M/S. Banwarilall Pasari………………………………………………...............................Respondent 16, India Exchange Place, Kolkata – 1. [Pan: Aacfb 7611 A] Appearances By: Shri Arindam Bhattacharjee, Addl. Cit Appearing On Behalf Of The Revenue. Shri S. Jhajharia, Fca Appearing On Behalf Of The Assessee. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : February 15, 2018 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : March 14, 2018 Order

1O to 2013-14. It is also true that similar disallowances had not been made in any of the earlier years, or the subsequent year. A.Y. 2013-14 which is also in appeal, but that is not a deciding factor in the matter. However, I find certain merit in the claim of the appellant that when the loan itself

ACIT, CIRCLE-34, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S BANWARILALL PASARI, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue for A

ITA 2115/KOL/2016[2013-14]Status: Disposed
ITAT Kolkata
14 Mar 2018
AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Am & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm] I.T.A. No. 2114 & 2115/Kol/2016 Assessment Years: 2012-13 & 2013-14 Acit Cir 34..............................………………………...........................................................Appellant Aayakar Bhawan, Poorva, 7Th Floor, 110, Shantipally, Kolkata – 107. M/S. Banwarilall Pasari………………………………………………...............................Respondent 16, India Exchange Place, Kolkata – 1. [Pan: Aacfb 7611 A] Appearances By: Shri Arindam Bhattacharjee, Addl. Cit Appearing On Behalf Of The Revenue. Shri S. Jhajharia, Fca Appearing On Behalf Of The Assessee. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : February 15, 2018 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : March 14, 2018 Order

1O to 2013-14. It is also true that similar disallowances had not been made in any of the earlier years, or the subsequent year. A.Y. 2013-14 which is also in appeal, but that is not a deciding factor in the matter. However, I find certain merit in the claim of the appellant that when the loan itself

DCIT, CIR-12(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S BENGAL AMBUJA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, the both appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1514/KOL/2015[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata18 Oct 2019AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Shri A.L.Saini, Am]

Section 80ISection 80i

disallowance of the balance sum. The relevant findings of the Ld. CIT(A) were as follows: “4.8 From the rival contentions the first issue which needs to be decided is whether for claiming deduction u/s 80IB(10) "Upohar the Condoville" set up on land admeasuring 18.62 acres should be considered to be single in divisible project or whether it could

ITO, WARD - 7(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. WIZARD ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and cross objections of the assessee are allowed as stated above

ITA 628/KOL/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata04 Mar 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: : Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: Shri Subash Agarwal, Advocate, ld.ARFor Respondent: None appeared on behalf of the revenue
Section 10ASection 10BSection 143(3)

1O B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. vi) Copy of certificate of Importer-Exporter Code (IEC) dt. 12.03.2003. vii) Copy of form of application for grant of licence for Public Private Bonded Warehouse- viz. Section 57/58 of the Customs Act. 4 CO No.134/K/2013 CO No.133/K/2013-C-AM M/s. Wizard Enterprise Pvt.Ltd viii) Copy of a letter dt. 03.04.2007, issued

I.T.O WD - 36(2),KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S SHREE KRISHNA DEVELOPERS, KOLKATA

ITA 568/KOL/2013[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 Aug 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Sh. P.M.Jagtap & Sh. S.S. Viswanethra Ravi[Assessment Year: 2006-07] Vs Ito, M/S. Shree Krishna Developers, Ward-36(2), 78, Bentinck Street, 5Th Floor, Kolkata. Kolkata-700001. Pan-Aaaas9791F (Appellant) (Respondent) [Assessment Year: 2007-08] Vs Ito, Shree Krishna Developers, Ward-36(2), 133, Canning Street, Kolkata. ‘Chopra House’, Kolkata-700001. Pan-Aaaas9791F (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Sh. Shallong Yaden, Addl. Cit Dr Respondent By Sh.D.S.Damle, Fca Date Of Hearing 18.06.2018 Date Of Pronouncement 31.08.2018 Order

Section 143(1)Section 148Section 80I

section shall apply to any undertaking which executes the housing project as a works contract awarded by any person (including the Central or State Government). In view of the above, the assessee AOP is not entitled to deduction u/s 801B(10) of the IT Act 1961 on this count.” 4. For the reasons given above, the AO disallowed the deduction