Search: disallowance | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2,383 results for “disallowance”+ Section 19clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai10,267 Delhi8,513 Bangalore3,014 Chennai2,767 Kolkata2,383 Ahmedabad1,983 Pune1,709 Hyderabad1,320 Jaipur1,279 Surat749 Indore725 Chandigarh702 Raipur465 Cochin432 Visakhapatnam404 Rajkot338 Cuttack338 Nagpur331 Karnataka306 Amritsar290 Lucknow250 Agra151 Panaji140 Guwahati119 Jodhpur114 Allahabad102 Ranchi100 SC87 Telangana74 Calcutta66 Patna64 Dehradun54 Varanasi36 Kerala34 Jabalpur32 Punjab & Haryana13 A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN5 Himachal Pradesh4 Rajasthan4 Orissa3 Gauhati2 ANIL R. DAVE AMITAVA ROY L. NAGESWARA RAO1 D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1 ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1 Tripura1 MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1 H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)84 Addition to Income72 Disallowance61 Section 14A59 Section 26355 Deduction32 Section 4027 Section 80I25 Section 14819 Section 143(1)

M/S. FUTURE DISTRIBUTORS,KOLKATA vs. PR.CIT, KOLKATA - 9, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 277/KOL/2016[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 Jul 2016AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

Section 131Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 263Section 40

19. Keeping in view all the submissions made by him, the ld. counsel for the assessee finally contended that no disallowance under section

DCIT, CIRCLE - 8(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. ASHIANA HOUSING LIMITED , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue stands dismissed and the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

Showing 1–20 of 2,383 · Page 1 of 120

...

19

ITA 2271/KOL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Oct 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: The Cit-A. The Cit-A By Placing His Reliance On An Order Of Kolkata Bench (Itat, Kolkata) In The Case Of Rei Agro Ltd Reported In (2013) 144 Itd 141 (Kolkata-Trib) Directed The Ao To Verify The Details Of Investment Filed Before Him & To Compute The Expenditure Accordingly In Terms Of Investment, Which Yielded Exempt Income.

For Appellant: Shri A. Bhattacharya, Addl. CIT, ld. Sr.DRFor Respondent: S/Shri Arvind Agarwal, Advocate &

Section 14ASection 14A(1)

disallowed an amount of Rs. 1,03,67,422/- under Rule 8D(2)(ii) and 8D(2)(iii) of Rs.30,07,706/- (Rs.50,19,372 – Rs.20,11,666 and totaling to Rs. 1,33,75,128/- u/s. 14A r.w.r 8D and added the same to the total income of assessee. The assesse 1 I.T.A No. 2271/Kol/2017 M/s. Ashiana Housing Limited

D.C.I.T CIR - 10(1), KOLKATA vs. M/S EUREKA FORBS LTD, KOLKATA

The appeal is dismissed

ITA 2037/KOL/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata12 Jan 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 115JSection 14ASection 250Section 92C

19,296/-) but disallowed only Rs.1.19,67,718/- (Rs.1,25,21,596/- 5,53,878/- (the assessee has suo-moto disallowed Rs.5,53,878/- Thus, the disallowance under Rule-BD of the IT Rule 1962 relevant section

D.C.I.T CIR - 10(1), KOLKATA vs. M/S EUREKA FORBS LTD, KOLKATA

The appeal is dismissed

ITA 1247/KOL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata12 Jan 2026AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 115JSection 14ASection 250Section 92C

19,296/-) but disallowed only Rs.1.19,67,718/- (Rs.1,25,21,596/- 5,53,878/- (the assessee has suo-moto disallowed Rs.5,53,878/- Thus, the disallowance under Rule-BD of the IT Rule 1962 relevant section

ACIT, CIRCLE-3, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S TATA METALICS LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, all the four appeals of the Revenue are dismissed, while all the four appeals of the assessee are treated as partly allowed as indicated above

ITA 956/KOL/2012[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata04 Mar 2016AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

disallowance of Rs.16,76,000/- made by the Assessing Officer under section 14A was restricted by the ld. CIT(Appeals) to Rs.34,750/-. 19

D.C.I.T CIR - 10,KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S PHILLIPS CARBON BLACK LTD, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of Revenue in ITA 2123/Kol/13 and ITA

ITA 2123/KOL/2013[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata12 Aug 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: : Shri P.M.Jagtap & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

For Appellant: Shri D.S.Damle, FCA, ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Kalyan Nath, JCIT, Sr.DR

Section 10Section 14Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14A

19-08-2010 in the following cases has held that 1% of the exempt income is fair and reasonable for the purpose of making disallowance u/s.14A, the relevant portion of which is reproduced as under: & CO No.30/Kol/2014 M/s. Philips Carbon Black Ltd “Since there was a difference of opinion between the ld. Members constituting the Division Bench of ITAT, Kolkata

DCIT, CIR-5(1), , KOLKATA vs. M/S COAL INDIA LTD., KOLKATA

ITA 1697/KOL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Jan 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 115JSection 250

section 115JB of the Act. 2) That on the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned CIT(Appeals) erred in confirming the action of the Assessing Officer in disallowing period expenditure amounting to Rs. 19

DCIT, CIRCLE - 5(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. COAL INDIA LIMITED , KOLKATA

ITA 622/KOL/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Jan 2026AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 115JSection 250

section 115JB of the Act. 2) That on the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned CIT(Appeals) erred in confirming the action of the Assessing Officer in disallowing period expenditure amounting to Rs. 19

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-4, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S KEVENTER AGRO LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 2768/KOL/2013[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata18 Oct 2017AY 2010-2011

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi

Section 143(3)Section 40(1)(a)Section 41(1)

19,76,692/- in its financial statement during the year. But no disallowance of interest has been made by the assessee. Accordingly the AO called upon the assessee for seeking clarification of making the disallowance of the expenses in accordance with the provision of section

M/S KEVENTER AGRO LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. ADDL.C.I.T., RANGE-4, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 2576/KOL/2013[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata18 Oct 2017AY 2010-2011

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi

Section 143(3)Section 40(1)(a)Section 41(1)

19,76,692/- in its financial statement during the year. But no disallowance of interest has been made by the assessee. Accordingly the AO called upon the assessee for seeking clarification of making the disallowance of the expenses in accordance with the provision of section

D.C.I.T CIR - 1,KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S TEENLOK ADVISORY SERVICES PVT LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed

ITA 1351/KOL/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata08 Jun 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap & Shri N.V. Vasudevan

Section 14ASection 36(1)(iii)

section 14A read with Rule 8D is held to be applicable in the case of the assessee, the Assessing Officer may be directed to compute the disallowance as per Rule 8D by taking into consideration only those shares which have yielded dividend income in the year under consideration. Since this issue raised by the ld. counsel for the assessee

ALLAHABAD BANK,KOLKATA vs. ADD.CIT,RANGE-6, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1199/KOL/2012[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata01 Jun 2016AY 2008-2009

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am ] Assessment Year : 2008-09

For Appellant: Shri Barun Kumar Ghosh & Shri Piyush Dey, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Rajat Subhra Biswas, CIT(DR)

Section 28Section 36Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(viia)

disallowances under section 14A by invoking Rule 8D amounting to Rs. ITA No.1199/Kol/2012 &1282/Kol/2012- Allahabad Bank A.Y.2008-09 4,20,90,323 in total disregard of order of his Learned predecessor in the Appeal No. 1014/ CIT(A) - VII 2009-10/Cir-6/Kol dated 15.11.2010 relating to Assessment Year 2007-08 and order of Jurisdictional ITAT in the case

SOMA RANI GHOSH,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR-49, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1420/KOL/2015[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Sept 2016AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

Section 194CSection 194C(6)Section 194C(7)Section 40

19 v) Sections 194C(6) and Section 194C(7) are independent of each other, and cannot be read together to attract disallowance

M/S. ELECTROSTEEL CASTING LIMITED.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTAL CIRCLE - 4(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

ITA 139/KOL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 Feb 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A Nos.138 & 139/Kol/2018 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2012-13 & 2013-14) M/S. Electrosteel Castings Ltd. Vs. Dcit, Central Circle-4(4), Kolkata. 19, G. K. Tower, Camac Street, Kolkata – 700 017. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaace 4975 B (Assessee) .. (Revenue) & आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A Nos.191 & 192/Kol/2018 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2012-13 & 2013-14) Dcit, Central Circle-4(4), Vs. M/S. Electrosteel Castings Ltd. Kolkata. 19, G. K. Tower, Camac Street, Kolkata – 700 017. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaace 4975 B (Revenue) .. (Assessee)

For Appellant: Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Dr. P. K. Srihari, CIT-DR & Robin Choudhury, Addl.CIT(DR)

Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 14A

19, G. K. Tower, Camac Street, Kolkata – 700 017. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No.: AAACE 4975 B (Revenue) .. (Assessee) Assessee by : Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate Revenue by : Dr. P. K. Srihari, CIT-DR & Robin Choudhury, Addl.CIT(DR) सुनवाईक"तार"ख/ Date of Hearing : 07/02/2019 घोषणाक"तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement : 28/02/2019 आदेश / O R D E R Per Shri

M/S. ELECTROSTEEL CASTING LIMITED.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTAL CIRCLE - 4(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

ITA 138/KOL/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 Feb 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A Nos.138 & 139/Kol/2018 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2012-13 & 2013-14) M/S. Electrosteel Castings Ltd. Vs. Dcit, Central Circle-4(4), Kolkata. 19, G. K. Tower, Camac Street, Kolkata – 700 017. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaace 4975 B (Assessee) .. (Revenue) & आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A Nos.191 & 192/Kol/2018 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2012-13 & 2013-14) Dcit, Central Circle-4(4), Vs. M/S. Electrosteel Castings Ltd. Kolkata. 19, G. K. Tower, Camac Street, Kolkata – 700 017. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaace 4975 B (Revenue) .. (Assessee)

For Appellant: Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Dr. P. K. Srihari, CIT-DR & Robin Choudhury, Addl.CIT(DR)

Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 14A

19, G. K. Tower, Camac Street, Kolkata – 700 017. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No.: AAACE 4975 B (Revenue) .. (Assessee) Assessee by : Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate Revenue by : Dr. P. K. Srihari, CIT-DR & Robin Choudhury, Addl.CIT(DR) सुनवाईक"तार"ख/ Date of Hearing : 07/02/2019 घोषणाक"तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement : 28/02/2019 आदेश / O R D E R Per Shri

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 4(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. ELECTROSTEEL CASTINGS LIMITED., KOLKATA

ITA 191/KOL/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 Feb 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A Nos.138 & 139/Kol/2018 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2012-13 & 2013-14) M/S. Electrosteel Castings Ltd. Vs. Dcit, Central Circle-4(4), Kolkata. 19, G. K. Tower, Camac Street, Kolkata – 700 017. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaace 4975 B (Assessee) .. (Revenue) & आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A Nos.191 & 192/Kol/2018 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2012-13 & 2013-14) Dcit, Central Circle-4(4), Vs. M/S. Electrosteel Castings Ltd. Kolkata. 19, G. K. Tower, Camac Street, Kolkata – 700 017. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaace 4975 B (Revenue) .. (Assessee)

For Appellant: Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Dr. P. K. Srihari, CIT-DR & Robin Choudhury, Addl.CIT(DR)

Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 14A

19, G. K. Tower, Camac Street, Kolkata – 700 017. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No.: AAACE 4975 B (Revenue) .. (Assessee) Assessee by : Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate Revenue by : Dr. P. K. Srihari, CIT-DR & Robin Choudhury, Addl.CIT(DR) सुनवाईक"तार"ख/ Date of Hearing : 07/02/2019 घोषणाक"तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement : 28/02/2019 आदेश / O R D E R Per Shri

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 4(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. ELECTROSTEEL CASTINGS LIMITED., KOLKATA

ITA 192/KOL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 Feb 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A Nos.138 & 139/Kol/2018 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2012-13 & 2013-14) M/S. Electrosteel Castings Ltd. Vs. Dcit, Central Circle-4(4), Kolkata. 19, G. K. Tower, Camac Street, Kolkata – 700 017. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaace 4975 B (Assessee) .. (Revenue) & आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A Nos.191 & 192/Kol/2018 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2012-13 & 2013-14) Dcit, Central Circle-4(4), Vs. M/S. Electrosteel Castings Ltd. Kolkata. 19, G. K. Tower, Camac Street, Kolkata – 700 017. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaace 4975 B (Revenue) .. (Assessee)

For Appellant: Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Dr. P. K. Srihari, CIT-DR & Robin Choudhury, Addl.CIT(DR)

Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 14A

19, G. K. Tower, Camac Street, Kolkata – 700 017. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No.: AAACE 4975 B (Revenue) .. (Assessee) Assessee by : Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate Revenue by : Dr. P. K. Srihari, CIT-DR & Robin Choudhury, Addl.CIT(DR) सुनवाईक"तार"ख/ Date of Hearing : 07/02/2019 घोषणाक"तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement : 28/02/2019 आदेश / O R D E R Per Shri

M/S RECKITT BENCKISER (I) LTD.,KOLKATA vs. JCIT, R-12, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed while both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1671/KOL/2008[2003-2004]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata25 May 2016AY 2003-2004

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

disallowance made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the ld. CIT(Appeals) on account of assessee’s claim for deduction under section 80IA to the extent of Rs.47,34,361/-. I.T.A. Nos. 1671/KOL./2008 & 1024/KOL/2009 Assessment years: 2003-2004 & 2004-2005 & I.T.A. Nos. 1699/KOL/2008 & 973/KOL/2009 Assessment years: 2003-2004 & 2004-2005 Page 19

DCIT, CC-1(3), KOLKATA vs. M/S RUNGTA MINES LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2199/KOL/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Nov 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri J. Sudhakar Reddy, Am & Ms. Madhumita Roy, Jm आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A No.2199/Kol/2019 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2015-16) Acit, Cc-1(3), Kolkata Vs. M/S Rungta Mines Pvt. Ltd. 8A, Express Tower, 42A, Shakespeare Sarani, Kolkata. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aabcr6463N (Appellant) .. (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Subash Agarwal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Supriyo Paul, Addl. CIT

Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 37

section 14A r.w.r 8D(3) of the IT Rules, 1962 the AO made disallowance of Rs. 63,31,460/- and added the same to the total income of assessee. The assessee challenged the same before the CIT-A. The CIT-A by placing reliance on an order of Kolkata Bench (ITAT, Kolkata) in the case of REI Agro Ltd reported

KESORAM INDUSTRIES LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR-5, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result the revenue’s appeals for A

ITA 1188/KOL/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 Apr 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am]

Section 10(34)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 250

19,17,487/- Rs. 61,47,311/- Total Aggrieved by the order of the action of the A.O., the assessee has preferred an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) – VI, Kolkata who upheld the disallowance of Rs. 61,41,311/- made under section