BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “disallowance”+ Section 18Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai8Kolkata4Bangalore4Delhi4SC2Hyderabad1Cochin1Rajkot1Chennai1

Key Topics

Section 4010Section 143(3)10Section 26310Section 37(1)5Section 14A3Disallowance3Revision u/s 2633Section 1312Addition to Income2

M/S POWER MAX (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR-8, KOL., KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 125/KOL/2017[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Jun 2018AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Am & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm] I.T.A. No. 125/Kol/2017 Assessment Year: 2011-12 M/S. Power Max (India) Pvt. Ltd....................................………………………….............Appellant 18A, Park Street, Stephen Court, Kolkata – 700 071. [Pan : Aabcp 9559 R] Dcit Circle 8 Kolkata..………………………………………………………….............Respondent Aayakar Bhawan Poorva, 110, Shanti Pally, 6Th Floor, Kolkata – 700 107. Appearances By: Shri A.N. Chatterjee, Fca Appearing On Behalf Of The Assessee. Shri S. Dasgupta, Addl. Cit (Dr) Appearing On Behalf Of The Revenue. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : April 05, 2018 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : June 15, 2018 Order Per P.M. Jagtap, Am This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Ld. Cit(A) – 18, Kolkata Dated 19.12.2016. 2. At The Time Of Hearing Before The Tribunal, The Learned Counsel For The Assessee Has Not Pressed Ground No 1 Raised In The Appeal Of The Assessee. It Is Also Noted That Ground No 4 Raised By The Assessee In This Appeal In General Which Does Not Call For Specific Adjudication.

Section 143(3)Section 194C(2)Section 194ISection 206ASection 40

section 40(a)(ia) to the extent of Rs. 37,23,755/- was rightly confirmed by the Ld. CIT(A). We, therefore, modify the impugned order of the Ld. CIT(A) on this issue and restrict the disallowance of Rs. 1,16,51,016/- made u/s 40(a)(ia) to Rs. 37,23,755/-. Ground no 2 of the assessee

M/S. EVEREADY INDUSTRIES INDIA LTD.,KOLKATA vs. PR.CIT-4, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 805/KOL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Dec 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am]

Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 263

Disallowance u/s 14A of the Act was not made by the A.O keeping in view the circular No. 5/2014 (F.No. 225/182/2013-ITA.II) dated 11-02-2014 as well as provisions laid down in the Act. (d) It is seen from clause 17 of TAR that the assesse did not take valuation of properly sold as per provisions of section

RUNGTA MINES LTD.,KOLKATA vs. PRINCIPAL CIT - 1, KOLKATA , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1326/KOL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata06 Jan 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Smt. Madhumita Roy)

Section 143(3)Section 263Section 37(1)

disallowance under Explanation 2 to Section 37(1) comes into play, but, as for latter, there is no such disabling provision as long as the expenses, even in discharge of corporate social responsibility on voluntary’ basis, can be said to be "wholly and exclusively for the 5 I.T.A. No. 1326/Kol/2018 Assessment Year: 2013-14 Rungta Mines Ltd. purposes of business

M/S DHANVANTI COMMODITIES PVT. LTD.,COMPANY vs. ITO, WARD-7(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1769/KOL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Feb 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Sri S.S. Viswanethra Ravii.T.A. No. 1769/Kol/2017 Assessment Year: 2012-13 M/S. Dhanvanti Commodities Pvt. Ltd………………....………………...…………………….….Appellant [Pan :Aaacd 9602 N] Ito, Ward-7(3), Kolkata………............................................................…....….…………..…...Respondent Appearances By: Shri S.M. Surana, Advocate, Appearing On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Robin Chowdhury, Addl. Cit, Sr. Dr, Appearing On Behalf Of The Respondent.

Section 131Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 250Section 263Section 68

disallowance u/s 14A and addition of share capital introduced u/s 68 of the Act. The Assessing Officer in his order states that summons u/s 131 were issued to all subscribing companies but there was no compliance on behalf of the directors of the subscribing companies. He also states that summons u/s 131 were issued to all the subscribing companies