BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “disallowance”+ Section 140Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai54Hyderabad25Delhi21Pune9Bangalore8Kolkata7Ahmedabad4Karnataka4Chennai3Jaipur2Varanasi2Amritsar1Punjab & Haryana1Rajkot1SC1Lucknow1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)10Section 14A8Section 234B6Section 2346Section 153A6Section 80I5Section 1434Section 139(1)4Deduction4Penalty

DCIT, CIRCLE - 11(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. GRAPHITE INDIA LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, considering the discussions made above, the appeal filed by the Revenue is partly allowed and the cross objection filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 473/KOL/2018[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Sept 2024AY 2007-08

Bench: Sri Sanjay Garg & Sri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 143(3)Section 144C(3)Section 62Section 801ASection 80I

140A(3). That section was already declared ultra vires by a competent High Court in the country and an authority like an Income-tax Tribunal acting anywhere in the country has to respect the law laid down by the High Court, though of a different State, so long as there is no contrary decision of any other High Court

DCIT, CEN. CIR-2(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. SHRI VIKASH JAIN, KOLKATA

3
Disallowance2
Search & Seizure2

In the result the appeals by the revenue are dismissed and the Cross Objections by the assessees are partly allowed

ITA 1282/KOL/2015[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata18 Aug 2017AY 2012-2013

Bench: Hon’Ble Sri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Shri J.Sudhakar Reddy, Am] I.T.A No. 1282/Kol/2015 Assessment Year : 2012-13 D.C.I.T., Central Circle-2(3) -Vs- Shri Vikash Jain Kolkata. Kolkata [Pan : Actpj 6174 D] (Respondent) (Appellant) I.T.A No. 1283/Kol/2015 Assessment Year : 2012-13 D.C.I.T., Central Circle-2(3) -Vs- Shri Vivek Jain Kolkata. Kolkata [Pan : Actpj 6173 E] (Respondent) (Appellant) C.O.Nos.58&59/Kol/2015 (A/O Ita Nos.1282 & 1283/Kol/2015) Shri Vikash Jain & Shri Vivek Jain -Vs- D.C.I.T., Central Circle-2(3) Kolkata Kolkata [Pan : Actpj 6174D & Actpj 6173 E] (Cross Objectors) (Respondent) For The Revenue : Shri Sallong Yaden, Addl. Cit For The Assessee : None Date Of Hearing : 14.08.2017. Date Of Pronouncement : 18.08.2017. Order Per N.V.Vasudevan, Jm

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Sallong Yaden, Addl. CIT
Section 140ASection 143Section 14ASection 234Section 234B

140A, the tax on the total income as declared in the return referred to in that section; (b) in any other case, the tax on the total income determined under sub-section (1) of section 143 or on regular assessment, as reduced by the amount of tax deducted or collected at source in accordance with the provisions of Chapter XVII

DCIT, CC-2(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. SHRI VIVEK JAIN, KOLKATA

In the result the appeals by the revenue are dismissed and the Cross Objections by the assessees are partly allowed

ITA 1283/KOL/2015[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata18 Aug 2017AY 2012-2013

Bench: Hon’Ble Sri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Shri J.Sudhakar Reddy, Am] I.T.A No. 1282/Kol/2015 Assessment Year : 2012-13 D.C.I.T., Central Circle-2(3) -Vs- Shri Vikash Jain Kolkata. Kolkata [Pan : Actpj 6174 D] (Respondent) (Appellant) I.T.A No. 1283/Kol/2015 Assessment Year : 2012-13 D.C.I.T., Central Circle-2(3) -Vs- Shri Vivek Jain Kolkata. Kolkata [Pan : Actpj 6173 E] (Respondent) (Appellant) C.O.Nos.58&59/Kol/2015 (A/O Ita Nos.1282 & 1283/Kol/2015) Shri Vikash Jain & Shri Vivek Jain -Vs- D.C.I.T., Central Circle-2(3) Kolkata Kolkata [Pan : Actpj 6174D & Actpj 6173 E] (Cross Objectors) (Respondent) For The Revenue : Shri Sallong Yaden, Addl. Cit For The Assessee : None Date Of Hearing : 14.08.2017. Date Of Pronouncement : 18.08.2017. Order Per N.V.Vasudevan, Jm

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Sallong Yaden, Addl. CIT
Section 140ASection 143Section 14ASection 234Section 234B

140A, the tax on the total income as declared in the return referred to in that section; (b) in any other case, the tax on the total income determined under sub-section (1) of section 143 or on regular assessment, as reduced by the amount of tax deducted or collected at source in accordance with the provisions of Chapter XVII

DCIT, CC-1(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. KKALPANA INDUSTRIES INDIA LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 452/KOL/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata25 Jun 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Sanjay Awasthiआयकर अपील सं/Ita No.452/Kol/2025 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2016-2017) Dcit, Cc-1(4), Kolkata Vs Kkalpana Industries India Ltd. 2B, Pretoria Street, Middleton Row, Kolkata-700071 Pan No. :Aabck 2239 D (अपीलधर्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) निर्धाररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri S.K.Tulsiyan, Advocate & Ms. Puja Somani, Ca रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri P.N.Barnwal, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 24/06/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 25/06/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per George Mathan, Jm : This Is An Appeal Filed By The Revenue Against The Order Dated 13.11.2024, Passed By The Ld. Cit(A), Kolkata-20, Passed In Din & Order No.Itba/Apl/S/250/2024-25/1070338584(1), For The Assessment Year 2016-2017. 2. Shri P.N.Barnwal, Ld.Cit-Dr Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue & Shri S.K.Tulsiyan, Advocate With Ms. Puja Somani, Ca, Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee. 3. A Perusal Of The Appeal Record, We Find That The Appeal Of The Revenue Has Been Filed Belatedly By 28 Days. In This Regard, The Revenue Has Filed An Application For Condonation Of Delay Stating Sufficient Reasons Which Are Plausible & Not Found To Be False. Thus, The Delay Of 28 Days In Filing The Appeal Is Condoned & Appeal Is Admitted For Hearing.

For Appellant: Shri S.K.Tulsiyan, Advocate and Ms. Puja Somani, CAFor Respondent: Shri P.N.Barnwal, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 148Section 45

disallowed the sum of Rs.21.69 crores (Rs.26.69 cr - Rs.5 Cr) claimed by the assessee under the head Business Income in his order passed u/s 147/143(3) of the Act dated 31-03-2022. 7. Aggrieved, the assessee filed an appeal before the learned CIT(A). The grounds of appeal so taken by the assessee before the learned

AMAR NATH SHROFF,KOLKATA vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA

In the result ITA Nos.1797 to 1800/Kol/2009 are allowed while ITA Nos

ITA 1797/KOL/2009[2001-02]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Mar 2016AY 2001-02

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Am ]

For Respondent: Shri Anil Kumar Pande, JCIT, Sr.DR
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274

140A of Rs.7,19,454/- and regular tax of Rs. 5,00,000/- and Rs.54,374/- paid on 22-07-2008. The appellant is still due to pay tax and interest of Rs.1 ,31 ,626/- For Assessment Year 2002-03, the appellant on a total income of Rs.1,09,30,780/- was liable to pay tax of Rs.33

DCIT, C.C. I, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. AMARNATH SHROFF, KOLKATA

In the result ITA Nos.1797 to 1800/Kol/2009 are allowed while ITA Nos

ITA 1494/KOL/2010[2001-02]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Mar 2016AY 2001-02

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Am ]

For Respondent: Shri Anil Kumar Pande, JCIT, Sr.DR
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274

140A of Rs.7,19,454/- and regular tax of Rs. 5,00,000/- and Rs.54,374/- paid on 22-07-2008. The appellant is still due to pay tax and interest of Rs.1 ,31 ,626/- For Assessment Year 2002-03, the appellant on a total income of Rs.1,09,30,780/- was liable to pay tax of Rs.33

SUVAPRASANNA BHATTACHARYA,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE - 55, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal filed by assessee is allowed

ITA 1303/KOL/2010[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata06 Nov 2015AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year :2006-07 Suvaprasanna Bhatacharya V/S. Acit, Circle-55, Bh-167, Salt Lake, Sector- 54/1, Rafi Ahmed Ii, Kolkata-700 016 Kidwai Road, [Pan No.Aedpb 2611 R] Kolkata – 700 016 .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

Section 131Section 131(1)Section 142(1)Section 271(1)Section 28

140A (-) 6,600 Total 24,92,377 Add 234B 7,50,419 Add 234C 123 Total Tax payable 30,23,135” In this appeal challenge by the Assessee is to the levy of penalty u/s.271(1) (c) of the Act in respect of the addition of a sum of Rs.60,99,454, Rs.1,09,473 and Rs.9,79,410/- which