BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 139Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Jaipur7Mumbai5Delhi4Cochin4Kolkata3Bangalore3Patna1Jabalpur1Chennai1

Key Topics

Section 143(2)6Section 2503Section 693Reopening of Assessment3Addition to Income3Section 1472Section 1482Business Income2

M/S. MANOHAR DEALCOM PRIVATE LIMITED. ,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD-9(1), KOLKATA. , KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 634/KOL/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata12 Apr 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 634/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2014-15 M/S. Manohar Dealcom Private Limited Income Tax Officer, Ward – C/O Nigam Centre Vs 9(1), Kolkata 155, Lenin Sarani 1St Floor, Room No. 110 Kolkata- 700013 [Pan : Aafcm8273R] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Sunil Surana, A/R Revenue By : Shri Arun Kumar Meena, Jcit, Sr. D/R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 07/02/2024 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 12/04/2024 आदेश/O R D E R Per Dr. Manish Borad: The Present Appeal Is Directed At The Instance Of The Assessee Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (Hereinafter The “Ld. Cit(A)”) Dt. 29/04/2023, Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act”) For The Assessment Year 2014-15. 2. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal:- “1. For That The Notice U/S 143(2) Of The Act Was Issued By The Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(2), Kolkata Who Had No Jurisdiction Over The Case Of The Assessee & As Such The Assessment Is Bad In Law. 2. For That Ld. Cit(A) Erred In Confirming The Addition Of Rs. 3.86 Crore Made By The Ao U/S 69 In Respect Of Increase In Loans & Advances As Compared To Preceding Financial Year In Spite Of The Fact That The -Loans Were Duly Recorded In The Regular Books Of Account & Were Advanced Out Of Amount Received Against Sale Of Disclosed Investments.

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Surana, A/RFor Respondent: Shri Arun Kumar Meena, JCIT, Sr. D/R
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)
Section 250
Section 69

disallowance of 40% was made at Rs.30,335/-. Income assessed at Rs.3,86,32,111/-. Aggrieved the assessee preferred appeal before the ld. CIT(A) and apart from raising grounds on merits also challenged the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer issuing notice u/s 143(2) of the Act. However, the assessee failed to succeed on any of the grounds

SMT SARATHI MAJUMDAR,SILIGURI vs. ITO, WD-2(3), SILIGURI, SILIGURI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed in part, and the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1116/KOL/2015[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata21 Dec 2017AY 2011-2012

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Sri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi]

Section 147Section 148Section 250

Section 139A(5) by not quoting her PAN while making cash deposits. Further, when summoned u/s. 131 by the Income Tax Officer (Intelligence & Criminal Investigation), Hakimpara, Siliguri to explain the sources of such cash deposits, 4 I.T.A. No. 1116/Kol/2017 Assessment Year: 2011-12 I.T.A. No. 1227/Kol/2015 Assessment Year: 2011-12 Smt. Sarathi Majumdar Sri Nimalaya Chakaraborty, Advocate appeared on behalf

ITO, WD-2(3), SILIGURI, SILIGURI vs. SMT SARATHI MAJUMDER, SILIGURI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed in part, and the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1227/KOL/2015[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata21 Dec 2017AY 2011-2012

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Sri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi]

Section 147Section 148Section 250

Section 139A(5) by not quoting her PAN while making cash deposits. Further, when summoned u/s. 131 by the Income Tax Officer (Intelligence & Criminal Investigation), Hakimpara, Siliguri to explain the sources of such cash deposits, 4 I.T.A. No. 1116/Kol/2017 Assessment Year: 2011-12 I.T.A. No. 1227/Kol/2015 Assessment Year: 2011-12 Smt. Sarathi Majumdar Sri Nimalaya Chakaraborty, Advocate appeared on behalf