TIRUPATI MEAL PRODUCERS (P) LTD.,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O.,WARD-2(4), KOLKATA
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed
ITA 904/KOL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 Nov 2019AY 2014-15
Bench: Shri J. Sudhakar Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri Aby T. Varkey, Hon’Ble] I.T.A. No. 904/Kol/2019 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Tirupati Meal Producers (P) Ltd……….................……....………………..……...……………...…Appellant C/O. Subash Agarwal & Associates, Advocates Siddha Gibson 1, Gibson Lane Suite 213 2Nd Floor Kolkata – 700 069 [Pan: Aaect 0620 N] Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(4), Kolkata..………………………………..........….....……......Respondent Appearances By: Shri Siddharth Agarwal, Advocate, Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee. Shri Supriyo Pal, Jcit, Sr. D/R, Appearing On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing : October 31St, 2019 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : November 29Th, 2019 O R D E R Per J. Sudhakar Reddy, Am :- This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) – 10, Kolkata, (Hereinafter The “Ld.Cit(A)”), Passed U/S. 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (The ‘Act’), Dt. 31/01/2019, For The Assessment Year 2014-15. 2. At The Outset We Find That There Is A Delay Of 23 (Twenty Three) Days In Filing Of This Appeal. After Perusing The Petition For Condonation, We Are Convinced That The Assessee Was Prevented By Sufficient Cause From Filing The Appeal On Time. Hence The Delay Is Condoned & The Appeal Is Admitted.
For Appellant: - a) Copy of the Registration Certificate issued u/s 12AA of the Act
Section 12ASection 250Section 35Section 35(1)(ii)
disallowance u/s 35(1)(ii) of the Act could be made in the instant c instant case.
8.3. We find that there is no provision in 8.3. We find that there is no provision in section 35(1)(ii) of the Act to of the Act to withdraw the recognition granted to the assessee therein. When there withdraw the recognition
