BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

1,226 results for “disallowance”+ Section 10(38)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai5,567Delhi4,960Bangalore1,672Chennai1,665Kolkata1,226Ahmedabad752Jaipur651Hyderabad586Pune435Indore370Surat327Chandigarh301Raipur259Rajkot165Nagpur156Amritsar144Karnataka139Cochin131Visakhapatnam117Lucknow111Agra93Cuttack86Allahabad67Jodhpur56Ranchi56Calcutta53SC48Guwahati43Telangana42Patna32Varanasi31Panaji28Dehradun21Kerala16Jabalpur14Rajasthan3Orissa2Punjab & Haryana2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Himachal Pradesh1Tripura1H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1ANIL R. DAVE AMITAVA ROY L. NAGESWARA RAO1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)86Section 14A67Addition to Income60Section 14857Section 14749Disallowance44Section 115J37Section 25036Section 6831Section 80I

RITA GUPTA,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CEN. CIR.2(2), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 46/KOL/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata06 Jun 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 10(38)Section 132Section 2(14)Section 45Section 45(1)Section 47

10(38) subject to the fulfillment of certain conditions and not the entire source which was excluded from the aforesaid sections . Therefore we are of the considered view that when the entire source is not excluded from the charging section and only special type of income is excluded then the interpretation of law has to be made strictly and cannot

DCIT, CIR-7(1), KOLKATA vs. M/S CD EQUIPFINANCE PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

Showing 1–20 of 1,226 · Page 1 of 62

...
28
Deduction24
Depreciation20

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 2146/KOL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata19 Jul 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2014-15 Deputy Commissioner C. D. Equifinance Pvt. Of Income-Tax Ltd. Vs. Circle-7(1) 37, Shakespeare Sarani Kolkata. Kolkata-700 017. (Pan: Aaccp7333A) (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Smt. Ranu Biswas, Addl. CIT, DRFor Respondent: Shri Akkal Dudhwewala, FCA
Section 10(38)Section 115JSection 143(3)

section 10(38) of the Act would not be attracted. We note that ld. AO has disallowed the long term

M/S. FUTURE DISTRIBUTORS,KOLKATA vs. PR.CIT, KOLKATA - 9, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 277/KOL/2016[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 Jul 2016AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

Section 131Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 263Section 40

disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) on account of payment of disbursed prize monies. 2. At the outset, it is noted that there is a delay of 75 days on the part of the assessee in filing this appeal before the Tribunal. In this regard, the assessee has filed an application seeking condonation of the said I.T.A. No. 277/KOL./2016

DCIT, CIR-12(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S BENGAL AMBUJA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, the both appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1514/KOL/2015[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata18 Oct 2019AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Shri A.L.Saini, Am]

Section 80ISection 80i

section 80-IB(10)(a) of the Act is "shall", but it would not necessarily mean that in every case, it shall be taken to be mandatory requirement instead would depend upon the intent of the Legislature and not the language in which the provision is clothed. The meaning and the intent of the Legislature would be gathered

SRI GOVINDDEO EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE ,KOLKATA vs. ITO(EXEMPTION) WARD-1(3) , KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 718/KOL/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata30 Jul 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma (Judicial Member), Shri Sanjay Awasthi (Accountant Member)

Section 10Section 10(22)Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 250

disallowance. 8. Dissatisfied with the above order, the assessee is in appeal before this Tribunal. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee stated that on identical facts and circumstances, the coordinate Bench of the ITAT, Kolkata Bench in the case of the assessee in ITA No. 1156/Kol/2023 vide order dated 04.03.2024 had held that provision of Section 10(23C)(iiiad

DCIT, CIR-12(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S BENGAL AMBUJA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT LTD., KOLKATA

Appeal is partly allowed in above terms

ITA 1298/KOL/2016[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Nov 2019AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Sainiassessment Year :2012-13

Section 143(3)Section 22Section 27

section 23 was inserted by finance Act 2017 w.e.f. 01.04.2018; ITA No.1298/Kol/2016 A.Y. 2012-13 DCIT Cir-12(1), Kol. Vs. M/s Bengal Ambuja Housing Development Ltd. Page 9 therefore, the same is not applicable for the assessment year under consideration. 11. Therefore, respectfully following the decisions of coordinate bench in assessee’s own case

ARUN ROY ,SILIGURI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 1, SILIGURI

In the result, all the appeals of all the captioned assessees are dismissed

ITA 2456/KOL/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 Oct 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarma

section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”). 2. Since common issue is involved in both the appeals relating to the disallowance of claim of exemption u/s. 10(38

SUMIT BAJAJ ,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD - 36(2) , KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of all the captioned assessees are dismissed

ITA 2553/KOL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 Oct 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarma

section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”). 2. Since common issue is involved in both the appeals relating to the disallowance of claim of exemption u/s. 10(38

MAMTA DEVI AGARWALA,SILIGURI vs. I.T.O.,WARD-2(1), SILIGURI

In the result, all the appeals of all the captioned assessees are dismissed

ITA 2468/KOL/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 Oct 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarma

section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”). 2. Since common issue is involved in both the appeals relating to the disallowance of claim of exemption u/s. 10(38

ANIL KUMAR AGARWALA,SILIGURI vs. I.T.O.,WARD-1(1), SILIGURI

In the result, all the appeals of all the captioned assessees are dismissed

ITA 2467/KOL/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 Oct 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarma

section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”). 2. Since common issue is involved in both the appeals relating to the disallowance of claim of exemption u/s. 10(38

RAJENDRA KUMAR GUPTA,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O.,WARD-36(1), KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of all the captioned assessees are dismissed

ITA 2175/KOL/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 Oct 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarma

section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”). 2. Since common issue is involved in both the appeals relating to the disallowance of claim of exemption u/s. 10(38

SHRUTI MUNDHRA ,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD - 36(2) , KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of all the captioned assessees are dismissed

ITA 2606/KOL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 Oct 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarma

section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”). 2. Since common issue is involved in both the appeals relating to the disallowance of claim of exemption u/s. 10(38

SUSHILA DEVI MUNDHRA ,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD - 36(2) , KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of all the captioned assessees are dismissed

ITA 2593/KOL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 Oct 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarma

section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”). 2. Since common issue is involved in both the appeals relating to the disallowance of claim of exemption u/s. 10(38

DCIT, LTU-2, KOLKATA vs. M/S CENTURY PLYBOARDS (I), LTD, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed and cross objections of assessee are allowed

ITA 2149/KOL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata04 Nov 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap(Kz) &Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm] Assessment Year: 2014-15

Section 10(34)Section 115JSection 14A

disallowed as per Rule 8D. It is noted that clause (f) of the said Explanation 1 requires adjustment of ‘the amount of expenditure relatable to any income to which section 10 (other than the provisions contained in clause (38

SAROJ BAID,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD 36(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1029/KOL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata14 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg, J & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 10(38)Section 143(3)Section 68

disallowance made by Ld. A.O. in denying the benefit of Long Term Capital Gain under section 10(38) of I.T. Act,1961. (5) That

SAROJ BAID,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD - 36(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 558/KOL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata14 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg, J & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 10(38)Section 143(3)Section 68

disallowance made by Ld. A.O. in denying the benefit of Long Term Capital Gain under section 10(38) of I.T. Act,1961. (5) That

DCIT, CIRCLE - 11, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. I M C LTD, KOLKATA

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 371/KOL/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata18 Jan 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri N.V.Vasudevan & Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 10(34)Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 14ASection 234B

disallowance of expenditure 'relatable' to the income to which Section 10 (other than Section 10(38) of the Act) or Section

DCIT, CIRCLE - 11, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. IMC LTD., KOLKATA

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 781/KOL/2009[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata18 Jan 2017AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri N.V.Vasudevan & Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 10(34)Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 14ASection 234B

disallowance of expenditure 'relatable' to the income to which Section 10 (other than Section 10(38) of the Act) or Section

M/S. IMC LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 11, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 813/KOL/2009[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata18 Jan 2017AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri N.V.Vasudevan & Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 10(34)Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 14ASection 234B

disallowance of expenditure 'relatable' to the income to which Section 10 (other than Section 10(38) of the Act) or Section

D.C.I.T CIR - 10,KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S PHILLIPS CARBON BLACK LTD, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of Revenue in ITA 2123/Kol/13 and ITA

ITA 2123/KOL/2013[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata12 Aug 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: : Shri P.M.Jagtap & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

For Appellant: Shri D.S.Damle, FCA, ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Kalyan Nath, JCIT, Sr.DR
Section 10Section 14Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14A

disallowance u/s 14A of the Act which has been disputed by the appellant and submitted as under: It is submitted that the only addition that can be made under clause (f) to the Explanation to section115JB are "the amount or amounts of expenditure relatable to any income to which section 10 (other than the provisions contained in clause (38