BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

320 results for “disallowance”+ Search & Seizureclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,585Delhi2,364Chennai580Bangalore568Hyderabad502Kolkata320Jaipur319Surat187Chandigarh132Ahmedabad120Pune119Indore108Cochin91Rajkot83Nagpur66Amritsar65Visakhapatnam61Allahabad51Guwahati45Lucknow44Raipur41Cuttack33Karnataka31Patna27Jodhpur26Telangana25Ranchi23Agra17Dehradun13Kerala10Panaji6SC6Calcutta5Gauhati2Punjab & Haryana2Varanasi2Orissa2Rajasthan1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 153A141Section 14879Addition to Income75Section 26373Section 14760Section 13258Search & Seizure55Section 143(3)47Disallowance37Section 250

M/S. INDIAN ROADWAYS CORPORATION LTD., ,KOLKATA vs. PRINCIPAL CIT, CENTRAL - 1, KOLKATA , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee, is allowed

ITA 787/KOL/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata12 Sept 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri A.T.Varkey, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Vs. Principal Commissioner Of M/S Indian Roadways Corporation Ltd. Income Tax, Central-I, Irc House, 1, Sunyat Sen Street, Kolkata, Aayakar Bhawan Kolkata-700012. Poorva, 110, Shantipally, Kolkata-700107. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaaci 7333 K (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) ..

For Appellant: Shri S.K.Tulsiyan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri P.K.Srihari, CIT(DR)
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 154Section 263Section 36

seizure on dated 13.03.2014, the search team did not find any incrementing material or new documents. The ld Pr.CIT exercised his jurisdiction based on the information/documents already available on record during the assessment under section 143(3) of the Act, dated 27.12.2011. Moreover, the amount of Rs. 10 lakh, was disallowed

Showing 1–20 of 320 · Page 1 of 16

...
29
Section 14A28
Deduction17

JKS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. PR.CIT, CENTRAL - 1, KOLKATA , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1073/KOL/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Dec 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.1073/Kol/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year:2011-12)

For Appellant: Shri Miraj D. Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Radhey Shyam, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 153ASection 24Section 263Section 68

seizure on dated 13.03.2014, the search team did not find any incrementing material or new documents. The ldPr.CIT exercised his jurisdiction based on the information/documents already available on record during the assessment under section 143(3) of the Act, dated 27.12.2011. Moreover, the amount of Rs. 10 lakh, was disallowed

M/S. CLIFF TREXIM PVT. LTD., ,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 3(2), KOLKATA , KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2520/KOL/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata18 Apr 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri A. T Varkey, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं/.Ita No.2519/Kol/2017 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2009-10) M/S. Garg Brothers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit, Central Circle- 3(2), Kolkata 57, Burtolla Street, Aayakar Bhawan Poorva, 110, Kolkata – 700 007. Shantipally, Kolkata – 700 107. "थायीलेखासं/.जीआइआरसं/.Pan/Gir No. : Aaacg 9775 F (Assessee) .. (Revenue) & आयकरअपीलसं/.Ita No.2520/Kol/2017 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2009-10) M/S. Cliff Treximpvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit, Central Circle- 3(2), Kolkata 57, Burtolla Street, Aayakar Bhawan Poorva, 110, Kolkata – 700 007. Shantipally, Kolkata – 700 107. "थायीलेखासं/.जीआइआरसं/.Pan/Gir No. : Aabcc 0961 E (Assessee) .. (Revenue) & आयकरअपीलसं/.Ita No.2521/Kol/2017 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2009-10) M/S. Span Foundation Pvt. Vs. Dcit, Central Circle- Ltd. 3(2), Kolkata Aayakar Bhawan Poorva, 110, 57, Burtolla Street, Shantipally, Kolkata – 700 107. Kolkata – 700 007. "थायीलेखासं/.जीआइआरसं/.Pan/Gir No. : Aaecs 4605 C (Assessee) .. (Revenue)

For Appellant: Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate & Bhoomija Verma, ARFor Respondent: Shri G. Mallikarjuna, CIT(DR)
Section 263

search and seizure, an assessment or reassessment was to be made afresh in accordance with section 153C 29 M/s. Garg Brothers Pvt. Ltd. M/s. Cliff TreximPvt. Ltd. M/s. Span Foundation Pvt. Ltd. Assessment Year: 2009-10 of the Act and the disallowance

M/S. SPAN FOUNDATION PVT. LTD.,,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 3(2), KOLKATA , KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2521/KOL/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata18 Apr 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri A. T Varkey, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं/.Ita No.2519/Kol/2017 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2009-10) M/S. Garg Brothers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit, Central Circle- 3(2), Kolkata 57, Burtolla Street, Aayakar Bhawan Poorva, 110, Kolkata – 700 007. Shantipally, Kolkata – 700 107. "थायीलेखासं/.जीआइआरसं/.Pan/Gir No. : Aaacg 9775 F (Assessee) .. (Revenue) & आयकरअपीलसं/.Ita No.2520/Kol/2017 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2009-10) M/S. Cliff Treximpvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit, Central Circle- 3(2), Kolkata 57, Burtolla Street, Aayakar Bhawan Poorva, 110, Kolkata – 700 007. Shantipally, Kolkata – 700 107. "थायीलेखासं/.जीआइआरसं/.Pan/Gir No. : Aabcc 0961 E (Assessee) .. (Revenue) & आयकरअपीलसं/.Ita No.2521/Kol/2017 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2009-10) M/S. Span Foundation Pvt. Vs. Dcit, Central Circle- Ltd. 3(2), Kolkata Aayakar Bhawan Poorva, 110, 57, Burtolla Street, Shantipally, Kolkata – 700 107. Kolkata – 700 007. "थायीलेखासं/.जीआइआरसं/.Pan/Gir No. : Aaecs 4605 C (Assessee) .. (Revenue)

For Appellant: Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate & Bhoomija Verma, ARFor Respondent: Shri G. Mallikarjuna, CIT(DR)
Section 263

search and seizure, an assessment or reassessment was to be made afresh in accordance with section 153C 29 M/s. Garg Brothers Pvt. Ltd. M/s. Cliff TreximPvt. Ltd. M/s. Span Foundation Pvt. Ltd. Assessment Year: 2009-10 of the Act and the disallowance

M/S. GARG BROTHERS PVT. LTD.,,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 3(2), KOLKATA , KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2519/KOL/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata18 Apr 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri A. T Varkey, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं/.Ita No.2519/Kol/2017 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2009-10) M/S. Garg Brothers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit, Central Circle- 3(2), Kolkata 57, Burtolla Street, Aayakar Bhawan Poorva, 110, Kolkata – 700 007. Shantipally, Kolkata – 700 107. "थायीलेखासं/.जीआइआरसं/.Pan/Gir No. : Aaacg 9775 F (Assessee) .. (Revenue) & आयकरअपीलसं/.Ita No.2520/Kol/2017 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2009-10) M/S. Cliff Treximpvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit, Central Circle- 3(2), Kolkata 57, Burtolla Street, Aayakar Bhawan Poorva, 110, Kolkata – 700 007. Shantipally, Kolkata – 700 107. "थायीलेखासं/.जीआइआरसं/.Pan/Gir No. : Aabcc 0961 E (Assessee) .. (Revenue) & आयकरअपीलसं/.Ita No.2521/Kol/2017 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2009-10) M/S. Span Foundation Pvt. Vs. Dcit, Central Circle- Ltd. 3(2), Kolkata Aayakar Bhawan Poorva, 110, 57, Burtolla Street, Shantipally, Kolkata – 700 107. Kolkata – 700 007. "थायीलेखासं/.जीआइआरसं/.Pan/Gir No. : Aaecs 4605 C (Assessee) .. (Revenue)

For Appellant: Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate & Bhoomija Verma, ARFor Respondent: Shri G. Mallikarjuna, CIT(DR)
Section 263

search and seizure, an assessment or reassessment was to be made afresh in accordance with section 153C 29 M/s. Garg Brothers Pvt. Ltd. M/s. Cliff TreximPvt. Ltd. M/s. Span Foundation Pvt. Ltd. Assessment Year: 2009-10 of the Act and the disallowance

DCIT, CC-4(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S MAAN STEEL & POWER LTD., KOLKATA

In the result this appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1192/KOL/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata06 Feb 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Sri A. T. Varkey)

Section 132Section 153ASection 250

seizure operations which were conducted at the premises of the entry operators and brokers. He submitted that these statements constitute incriminating material. The ld. D/R further contended that the addition was based on incriminating material in the form of a post search investigation which led to the preparation and establishment of a cash trail of the entire chain of transactions

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. PRAKASH PLY CENTRE PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of assessee is assessee is allowed”

ITA 1313/KOL/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata18 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Sainiit(Ss)A No.24-25/Kol/2017 &

Section 153ASection 153CSection 153c

disallowances." The Hon'ble Kolkata High Court in the above cases relied on the following judgments. CIT vs. Kabul Chawla (2016) 380 ITR 0573 (Del) Search and seizure

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. PRAKASH PLY CENTRE PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of assessee is assessee is allowed”

ITA 1314/KOL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata18 Sept 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Sainiit(Ss)A No.24-25/Kol/2017 &

Section 153ASection 153CSection 153c

disallowances." The Hon'ble Kolkata High Court in the above cases relied on the following judgments. CIT vs. Kabul Chawla (2016) 380 ITR 0573 (Del) Search and seizure

SALARPURIA PROPERTIES PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T., CENTRAL CIRCLE - 1(2), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1986/KOL/2024[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata25 Jul 2025AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar&Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey]

Section 51

disallowances of Rs. 32,99,022/- on proportionate interest on interest free shares application money, interest on TDS at Rs. 1,90,719/- and at last assessed total income of the assessee at Rs. 56,18,05,280/-. 4. Aggrieved by the said order, the assessee preferred an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) wherein the appeal of the assessee

M/S/ RASHMI METALIKS LTD.,KOLKATA vs. A/DCIT, CC-2(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 813/KOL/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 May 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri J.Sudhakar Reddy, Am & Shri A.T.Varkey, Jm ]

For Appellant: Shri A.K.Tulsiyan, FCAFor Respondent: Shri G.Mallikarjuna, CIT(DR)
Section 132Section 153ASection 263Section 801A(4)Section 80ISection 80l

search and seizure operation conducted on 18.02.2013 no incriminating documents relating to the issue were found and seized relatable to the claim of deduction u/s 80IA of the Act and as the assessments for A.Y.2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12 have not abated, no disallowance

M/S/ RASHMI METALIKS LTD.,KOLKATA vs. A/DCIT, CC-2(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 816/KOL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 May 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri J.Sudhakar Reddy, Am & Shri A.T.Varkey, Jm ]

For Appellant: Shri A.K.Tulsiyan, FCAFor Respondent: Shri G.Mallikarjuna, CIT(DR)
Section 132Section 153ASection 263Section 801A(4)Section 80ISection 80l

search and seizure operation conducted on 18.02.2013 no incriminating documents relating to the issue were found and seized relatable to the claim of deduction u/s 80IA of the Act and as the assessments for A.Y.2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12 have not abated, no disallowance

M/S/ RASHMI METALIKS LTD.,KOLKATA vs. A/DCIT, CC-2(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 814/KOL/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 May 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri J.Sudhakar Reddy, Am & Shri A.T.Varkey, Jm ]

For Appellant: Shri A.K.Tulsiyan, FCAFor Respondent: Shri G.Mallikarjuna, CIT(DR)
Section 132Section 153ASection 263Section 801A(4)Section 80ISection 80l

search and seizure operation conducted on 18.02.2013 no incriminating documents relating to the issue were found and seized relatable to the claim of deduction u/s 80IA of the Act and as the assessments for A.Y.2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12 have not abated, no disallowance

M/S/ RASHMI METALIKS LTD.,KOLKATA vs. A/DCIT, CC-2(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 815/KOL/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 May 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri J.Sudhakar Reddy, Am & Shri A.T.Varkey, Jm ]

For Appellant: Shri A.K.Tulsiyan, FCAFor Respondent: Shri G.Mallikarjuna, CIT(DR)
Section 132Section 153ASection 263Section 801A(4)Section 80ISection 80l

search and seizure operation conducted on 18.02.2013 no incriminating documents relating to the issue were found and seized relatable to the claim of deduction u/s 80IA of the Act and as the assessments for A.Y.2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12 have not abated, no disallowance

SHARMITA MURARKA,KOLKATA vs. DCIT,CC - XVIII,K, KOLKATA

In the result, this Ground of the assessee is allowed

ITA 56/KOL/2015[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata01 Oct 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Sri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi) I.T.A. No. 55/Kol/2015 Assessment Year: 2012-13 Prabhadevi Murarka…………………....................................................................................…………Appellant 1/C, Madevilla Garden Kolkata – 700 019 [Pan : Afdpm 2245 R] Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cc-Xviii, Kolkata…………………..…………………..Respondent I.T.A. No. 56/Kol/2015 Assessment Year: 2012-13 Sharmita Murarka……………………....................................................................................…………Appellant 1/C, Madevilla Garden Kolkata – 700 019 [Pan : Afdpm 1477 K] Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cc-Xviii, Kolkata……………………………………..Respondent I.T.A. No. 57/Kol/2015 Assessment Year: 2012-13 Sabita Dey…………………………………....................................................................................…………Appellant 1/C, Madevilla Garden Kolkata – 700 019 [Pan : Aaipd 9654 M] Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cc-Xviii, Kolkata……………………………………..Respondent Appearances By: Shri Akkal Dudhewala, Fca, Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee. Shri Radhe Shyam, Cit, D/R Appearing On Behalf Of The Revenue. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : August 18Th, 2019 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : October 1St, 2019 Order Per J. Sudhakar Reddy, Am :-

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 250

seizure operation was conducted u/s 132 of the Act, in the case of Murarka Group on 28/07/2011 and on subsequent dates. During the course of search /2011 and on subsequent dates. During the course of search /2011 and on subsequent dates. During the course of search operation, the residential premises of Shri Shyama Prasad Murarka & Smt. Prabha Devi operation

PRABHADEVI MURARKA,KOLKATA vs. DCIT,CC - XVIII,KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, this Ground of the assessee is allowed

ITA 55/KOL/2015[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata01 Oct 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Sri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi) I.T.A. No. 55/Kol/2015 Assessment Year: 2012-13 Prabhadevi Murarka…………………....................................................................................…………Appellant 1/C, Madevilla Garden Kolkata – 700 019 [Pan : Afdpm 2245 R] Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cc-Xviii, Kolkata…………………..…………………..Respondent I.T.A. No. 56/Kol/2015 Assessment Year: 2012-13 Sharmita Murarka……………………....................................................................................…………Appellant 1/C, Madevilla Garden Kolkata – 700 019 [Pan : Afdpm 1477 K] Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cc-Xviii, Kolkata……………………………………..Respondent I.T.A. No. 57/Kol/2015 Assessment Year: 2012-13 Sabita Dey…………………………………....................................................................................…………Appellant 1/C, Madevilla Garden Kolkata – 700 019 [Pan : Aaipd 9654 M] Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cc-Xviii, Kolkata……………………………………..Respondent Appearances By: Shri Akkal Dudhewala, Fca, Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee. Shri Radhe Shyam, Cit, D/R Appearing On Behalf Of The Revenue. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : August 18Th, 2019 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : October 1St, 2019 Order Per J. Sudhakar Reddy, Am :-

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 250

seizure operation was conducted u/s 132 of the Act, in the case of Murarka Group on 28/07/2011 and on subsequent dates. During the course of search /2011 and on subsequent dates. During the course of search /2011 and on subsequent dates. During the course of search operation, the residential premises of Shri Shyama Prasad Murarka & Smt. Prabha Devi operation

SABITA DEY,KOLKATA vs. DCIT,CC-XVIII,KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, this Ground of the assessee is allowed

ITA 57/KOL/2015[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata01 Oct 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Sri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi) I.T.A. No. 55/Kol/2015 Assessment Year: 2012-13 Prabhadevi Murarka…………………....................................................................................…………Appellant 1/C, Madevilla Garden Kolkata – 700 019 [Pan : Afdpm 2245 R] Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cc-Xviii, Kolkata…………………..…………………..Respondent I.T.A. No. 56/Kol/2015 Assessment Year: 2012-13 Sharmita Murarka……………………....................................................................................…………Appellant 1/C, Madevilla Garden Kolkata – 700 019 [Pan : Afdpm 1477 K] Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cc-Xviii, Kolkata……………………………………..Respondent I.T.A. No. 57/Kol/2015 Assessment Year: 2012-13 Sabita Dey…………………………………....................................................................................…………Appellant 1/C, Madevilla Garden Kolkata – 700 019 [Pan : Aaipd 9654 M] Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cc-Xviii, Kolkata……………………………………..Respondent Appearances By: Shri Akkal Dudhewala, Fca, Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee. Shri Radhe Shyam, Cit, D/R Appearing On Behalf Of The Revenue. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : August 18Th, 2019 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : October 1St, 2019 Order Per J. Sudhakar Reddy, Am :-

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 250

seizure operation was conducted u/s 132 of the Act, in the case of Murarka Group on 28/07/2011 and on subsequent dates. During the course of search /2011 and on subsequent dates. During the course of search /2011 and on subsequent dates. During the course of search operation, the residential premises of Shri Shyama Prasad Murarka & Smt. Prabha Devi operation

SRI KRISHNA GHOSH,DAKSHIN DINAJPUR vs. A.C.I.T CC XX KOL, KOLKATA

In the result, assessee’s appeal in ITA No

ITA 1907/KOL/2009[2000-01]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata03 Aug 2016AY 2000-01

Bench: Shri N.V.Vasudevan & Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 153A

disallowed amounts in the search proceedings is liable to be deleted.” “1. That the Ld. CIT(A) erred in sustaining the part of the addition made by the L. AO estimating the higher profit on surmises and conjectures and ignoring the fact that no evidence of higher profit was found during search and seizure

SRI KRISHNA GHOSH,DAKSHIN DINAJPUR vs. A.C.I.T CC XX KOL, KOLKATA

In the result, assessee’s appeal in ITA No

ITA 1906/KOL/2009[1999-2000]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata03 Aug 2016AY 1999-2000

Bench: Shri N.V.Vasudevan & Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 153A

disallowed amounts in the search proceedings is liable to be deleted.” “1. That the Ld. CIT(A) erred in sustaining the part of the addition made by the L. AO estimating the higher profit on surmises and conjectures and ignoring the fact that no evidence of higher profit was found during search and seizure

ACIT, CC-IV, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. MANOJ KR. JAIN & SONS (HUF), KOLKATA

In the result appeals of the Assessee are allowed while the appeals by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1183/KOL/2011[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata06 Apr 2016AY 2002-03

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am ]

For Respondent: Shri Rajat Kumar Kureel, JCIT, Sr.DR
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 139Section 153ASection 153CSection 271(1)(c)

seizure operations and discovery of material in such search, the Assessee would not have offered income to tax in the course of search proceedings and in the return of income filed after the search in the proceedings u/s.153A of the Act. The AO imposed penalty equal to 300% of the tax sought to be evaded. In the show cause notice

MANOJ KUMAR JAIN & SONS (HUF),KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CC-IV, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result appeals of the Assessee are allowed while the appeals by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1238/KOL/2011[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata06 Apr 2016AY 2002-03

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am ]

For Respondent: Shri Rajat Kumar Kureel, JCIT, Sr.DR
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 139Section 153ASection 153CSection 271(1)(c)

seizure operations and discovery of material in such search, the Assessee would not have offered income to tax in the course of search proceedings and in the return of income filed after the search in the proceedings u/s.153A of the Act. The AO imposed penalty equal to 300% of the tax sought to be evaded. In the show cause notice