BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “depreciation”+ Section 801E(5)clear

Sorted by relevance

Guwahati6Kolkata4Ahmedabad3Delhi2Mumbai2Jaipur1

Key Topics

Section 80I29Deduction4Disallowance3Addition to Income3Section 92C2Section 2632

DCIT CIR-4(1), KOLKATA, AAYAKAR BHAWAN vs. MCLEOD RUSSEL INDIA LTD, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1169/KOL/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Apr 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar&Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey]

Section 115OSection 143(2)Section 14ASection 80ISection 92C

801E, it is apparent that nowhere the Section requires that the additions to the fixed assets exceeding 25% should be carried out in any one previous year. There is no bar on the assessee to conduct or carry out the expansion programs over a period of time that would exceed one financial year. The language of the Act indicates that

DCIT, CIR-4(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S MCLEOD RUSSEL INDIA LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 117/KOL/2016[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata01 Feb 2019AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am]

Section 80I

801E, it is apparent that nowhere the Section requires that the additions to the fixed assets exceeding 25% should be carried out in any one previous year. There is no bar on the assessee to conduct or carry out the expansion programs over a period of time that would exceed one financial year. The language of the Act indicates that

DCIT, CIR-4(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S MCLEOD RUSSEL INDIA LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 116/KOL/2016[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata01 Feb 2019AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am]

Section 80I

801E, it is apparent that nowhere the Section requires that the additions to the fixed assets exceeding 25% should be carried out in any one previous year. There is no bar on the assessee to conduct or carry out the expansion programs over a period of time that would exceed one financial year. The language of the Act indicates that

MCLEOD RUSSEL INDIA LTD,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-4(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 682/KOL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 Jul 2017AY 2012-13

Bench: Hon’Ble Sri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Am] I.T.A No. 682/Kol/2017 Assessment Year : 2012-13 Mcleod Russel India Ltd. -Vs.- D. C.I.T., Circle-4 (1), Kolkata Kolkata [Pan : Aaace 6918 J] (Respondent) (Appellant) For The Appellant : Shri D.S.Damle, Ar For The Respondent : Shri Goulen Hangshing, Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing : 25.07.2017. Date Of Pronouncement : 28.07.2017. Order Per N.V.Vasudevan, Jm

For Appellant: Shri D.S.Damle, ARFor Respondent: Shri Goulen Hangshing, CIT(DR)
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 80I

depreciation has already been claimed u/s 80IE. Looking into the details, it was found that the assessee is not eligible to claim deduction u/s 80IE for the following eleven tea estates : Name of the Estate Amount claimed Amount considered for (Rs.) disallowance in current year (Rs.) Paneery 1,04,53,251 1,04,53,251 Mijcajan