BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “depreciation”+ Section 7Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai95Delhi56Chennai47Bangalore38Hyderabad26Ahmedabad26Cochin21Raipur17Jaipur11Pune11Karnataka8Lucknow8Kolkata4Chandigarh2Surat2Nagpur1Dehradun1Rajkot1SC1Kerala1Jodhpur1Telangana1Indore1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)7Section 2634Section 354Section 684Addition to Income4Section 153A3Section 1312Section 2502Deduction2Depreciation

DCIT, CIR-7(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. GANESH REALTY & MALL DEVELOPMENT PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

ITA 581/KOL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata23 Jan 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.581/Kol/2017 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2012-13)

For Appellant: Shri A.K. Singh, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri D.S. Damle, AR
Section 120(4)Section 131Section 143(3)Section 24Section 68

depreciation claims and many other claims of expenses were withdrawn and deduction u/s 24(a) was claimed. This resulted in scaling down of the loss claimed by the assessee. In assessment proceedings the Assessing Officer considered rental income of Rs.3,67,94,120/- under the head income from house property, but the utility charges of Rs.7,59,59,588/- received

2
Limitation/Time-bar2

HINDUSTHAN ENGINEERING & INDUSTRIES LTD,KOLKATA vs. PCIT, CENTRAL -1, KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 201/KOL/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Dec 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma] "ी राजेश कुमार लेखा सद"य एवं "ी संजय शमा" "या"यक सद"य के सम" I.T.(Ss)A. Nos. 19 To 25/Kol/2019 Assessment Years : 2009-10 To 2015-16 M/S Hindusthan Engineering & Vs. Acit, Central, Range-1, Kolkata Industries Ltd. (Pan: Aaach 8505 Q) Appellant / (अपीलाथ") Respondent / (" यथ")

Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 263Section 35

depreciation in consonance with provisions of the Act as interpreted by various judicial forums discussed hereunder. The case of the assessee is squarely covered by the decision of Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of CIT vs. Commissioner of Income-tax-II, Thanev.Continental Warehousing Corporation (Nhava Sheva) Ltd. (supra) and the decision of Hon’ble Delhi High Court

M/S. MATARANI VINTRADE PVT. LTD., ,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD - 15(1), KOLKATA , KOLKATA

ITA 343/KOL/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata04 Nov 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri P.M. Jagtap, V.P (Kz) & Hon’Ble Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm Assessment Year: 2012-13

Section 131Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 251(2)

7A, Kolkata-700 069 (refer Form 36 filed before this Tribunal). According to the Ld. AR in between 14/1/2015 and 14/6/2017 due to landlord’s illegal action, the assessee could not get the last two notices of enhancement as issued/sent by the Ld. CIT(A) in the premises at 21,HemantaBasuSarani, Fifth Floor, Room No. 506, Kolkata-700 001. However

M/S SATYAM SMELTERS PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T.,CIRCLE-3(1), KOLKATA

ITA 2445/KOL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 May 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: "ी जे. सुधाकर रे"डी, लेखा सद"य एवं/And "ी ऐ. ट". वक", "यायीक सद"य) [Before Shri J. Sudhakar Reddy, Am & Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

Section 143(3)Section 3Section 68

section 143(3) of the Act, then the question of identity of the investor companies cannot be doubted. According to the Ld. Counsel, both the investor group companies have enough creditworthiness to invest in the assessee company and drew our attention to the fact that M/s. SSHPL has capital with free reserve and surplus of Rs.48