BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “depreciation”+ Section 56(2)(viia)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai102Bangalore63Chandigarh41Delhi40Chennai31Hyderabad17Pune10Surat8Jodhpur7Ahmedabad4Jaipur3Kolkata3Allahabad2Lucknow2SC2Rajkot2Visakhapatnam1Amritsar1Indore1Karnataka1Nagpur1Raipur1

Key Topics

Section 36(1)(viia)14Section 80P6Section 80P(2)(a)4Section 80P(2)(d)4Section 142(1)4Section 143(3)3Deduction3Section 2632Section 802Disallowance

GUNJA SAMABAY KRISHI UNNAYAN SAMITY LTD,PURULIA vs. PCIT,, ASANSOL

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 110/KOL/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 Jun 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2016-17 Gunja Samabay Krishi Pcit, Asansol Unnayan Samity Ltd. Vill. Gunja, Golbera, P.S. Vs. Joypur, Dist. Purulia, Pin. 723103 Pan: Aabag 2110 M (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri M. Goenka, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sudipta Guha, CIT, DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(2)(i)

56 of the Act, leading the impugned assessment as erroneous in so far as prejudicial to the interest of revenue for which a show-cause notice (SCN) was issued by the ld. PCIT dated 09.02.2021. 7.1. Against this show-cause notice assessee furnished its written submission on 04.03.2021 and claimed that assessee is a primary agricultural credit society registered

2
Addition to Income2

UCO BANK,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE -6, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 1202/KOL/2012[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Oct 2016AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh, Am & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm]

For Appellant: S/Shri D.S.Damle & Akkal Dudhwewala, FCAFor Respondent: Shri G. Mallikarjuna, CIT, DR
Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(viia)

56,86,471/- on the ground that the deduction under Section 36(1)(viia) needs to be restricted to actual provision made in the books.” 2.1. The ld AR argued that this issue pertains to claim of deduction towards provision for bad and doubtful debts as per the provisions of section 36(1)(viia) of the Act in excess

DCIT,CIRCLE-6, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. UCO BANK, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 1281/KOL/2012[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Oct 2016AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh, Am & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm]

For Appellant: S/Shri D.S.Damle & Akkal Dudhwewala, FCAFor Respondent: Shri G. Mallikarjuna, CIT, DR
Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(viia)

56,86,471/- on the ground that the deduction under Section 36(1)(viia) needs to be restricted to actual provision made in the books.” 2.1. The ld AR argued that this issue pertains to claim of deduction towards provision for bad and doubtful debts as per the provisions of section 36(1)(viia) of the Act in excess