BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

170 results for “depreciation”+ Section 43Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai534Delhi381Chennai172Kolkata170Bangalore138Ahmedabad119Raipur108Jaipur66Hyderabad57Pune46Visakhapatnam41Surat39Cuttack37Cochin25Lucknow19Guwahati18Amritsar16Indore15Karnataka10Chandigarh10Nagpur7Allahabad5SC4Rajkot4Telangana4Rajasthan3Agra3Jodhpur3Calcutta3Kerala2Panaji2Patna2Ranchi1

Key Topics

Section 43B112Section 143(3)100Section 14A79Disallowance69Section 115J55Deduction52Addition to Income51Section 26331Depreciation25Section 250

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-10, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S VISHAL RETAIL LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result the appeal filed by the Revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2627/KOL/2013[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Mar 2017AY 2008-2009

Bench: Sri Aby T.Varkeyand Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 43B

43B of the Act. Accordingly the assessee was required to make the payment of the interest before the due date of filing income tax returns as specified under section 139(1) of the Act. Hence we have no hesitation to reverse the order of ld CIT(A). Hence, this ground of appeal raised by the Revenue is allowed

DCIT,CIRCLE-6, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. INTEGRATED COAL MINING LTD, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1138/KOL/2012[2008-2009]Status: Disposed

Showing 1–20 of 170 · Page 1 of 9

...
24
Section 139(1)16
Section 36(1)(viia)16
ITAT Kolkata
13 Nov 2015
AY 2008-2009

Bench: : Shri M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: Shri J.P Khaitan, ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri G.Mallikarjuna, CIT, ld.DR
Section 143(3)Section 14A

section 43B of the Act itself specifically states that amounts payable under the relevant law shall be allowed as deduction only on payment basis. Hence in these facts and circumstances, the decision of the Hon’ble ITA Nos..1146, 1138/Kol/2012-C-AM 18 Apex Court in the case of Chowringhee Sales Bureau Pvt Ltd vs CIT reported

BINAYAK IMAGINE & DIAGNOSTIC PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR. 7(1), KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee ispartly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 519/KOL/2021[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata11 Aug 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar&Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 143(3)

depreciation @ 40%. 7. Issue raised in ground nos. 4 & 5 is against the disallowance of employees contribution to PF &ESI amounting to Rs. 69,448/- u/s 36(1)(va) of the Act. 8. At the outset, we note that the grounds of appeal relate to disallowance made u/s. 36(1)(va) of the Act in respect of delayed deposit

DCIT, CIR-4(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S MCLEOD RUSSEL INDIA LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 115/KOL/2016[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata03 May 2019AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am]

Section 143(3)Section 43B

Section 43B(f) of the Act. We further note that this separate disallowance made u/s 43B(f) was confirmed by the Ld. CIT(A) against which no appeal has been preferred by the assessee. We therefore find merit in the Ld. AR’s submissions that when the provision for leave encashment had been separately added back u/s 43B(f) while

DCIT, CIR-4(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S MCLEOD RUSSEL INDIA LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 114/KOL/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata03 May 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am]

Section 143(3)Section 43B

Section 43B(f) of the Act. We further note that this separate disallowance made u/s 43B(f) was confirmed by the Ld. CIT(A) against which no appeal has been preferred by the assessee. We therefore find merit in the Ld. AR’s submissions that when the provision for leave encashment had been separately added back u/s 43B(f) while

DCIT, CIR-12, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S HINDUSTAN GUMS & CHEMICAL LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 752/KOL/2014[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata08 Mar 2017AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm]

For Appellant: S/Shri J. P. Khaitan, Sr. Adv. & Sanjay Bhaumik, AdvFor Respondent: Shri S. S. Alam, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 43B

43B(f) is on the statute book but at the same time it would be entitled to make a claim in its returns.” Hence from the aforesaid Supreme Court judgement, it could be inferred that the Hon’ble Supreme Court had not stayed the judgement of the Calcutta High Court during Leave proceedings. But the Hon’ble Supreme Court

HINDUSTAN GUM & CHEMICALS LTD.,KOLKATA vs. THE DCIT, CIR-12, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 462/KOL/2014[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata08 Mar 2017AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm]

For Appellant: S/Shri J. P. Khaitan, Sr. Adv. & Sanjay Bhaumik, AdvFor Respondent: Shri S. S. Alam, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 43B

43B(f) is on the statute book but at the same time it would be entitled to make a claim in its returns.” Hence from the aforesaid Supreme Court judgement, it could be inferred that the Hon’ble Supreme Court had not stayed the judgement of the Calcutta High Court during Leave proceedings. But the Hon’ble Supreme Court

STAR PAPER MILLS LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR. 4(2), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 127/KOL/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 Oct 2021AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri P. M .Jagtap, Vice-(Kz) & Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 80ISection 92B

Section 43B of the Act and is therefore 32 I.T.A. No.127/Kol/2021 Assessment Year: 2016-17 Star Paper Mills Limited allowable only on actual payment basis. For the reasons as aforesaid, this ground of appeal therefore stands dismissed. 47. The issue raised by assessee in Ground No.13 of the appeal is for giving the direction to AO for re-computation

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S RAMKRISHNA FORGINGS LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the In the result, both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the cross- objection of the assessee is allowed in part

ITA 113/KOL/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Mar 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Sri Aby T. Varkey) Assessment Year: 2009-10

Section 2Section 250

section 43B by failing to appreciate the fact that the provisions of employees contribution is governed by the provisions of Sec 36(I)(va) provisions of employees contribution is governed by the provisions of Sec 36(I)(va) provisions of employees contribution is governed by the provisions of Sec 36(I)(va) read with

DCIT, CIRCLE - 6(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. INTEGRATED COAL MINING LIMITED, KOLKATA

Appeal is partly allowed in above terms

ITA 170/KOL/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Mar 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Sainiassessment Year :2010-11 Dcit, Circle-6(1), V/S. M/S Integrated Coal P-7, Chowringhee Mining Ltd., 6, Church Square, Kolkata-69 Lane, 1Ste Floor, Kolakta-700001 [Pan No.Aaaci 5584 L] .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Dr. P.K. Srihari, Cit-Dr अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/By Appellant Shri Diparun Mukherjee, Aca & ""यथ" क" ओर से/By Respondent Shri Alolk Goenka, Aca 15-01-2019 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing 15-03-2019 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement

Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 43B

43B of the outstanding as on the return of income of Income tax Act, last day of the the previous year 1961 (Rs) previous year (Rs) under section 139(1) (Rs) RE Cess PE cess Re Cess PE cess `RE cess PE cess RE cess PE cess

DCIT, CIRCLE - 11(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. EPCOS FERRITES LTD., (SINCE MERGED WITH M/S. EPCOS INDIA P. LTD.,), NADIA

In the result, the both appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed, except other ground no

ITA 1597/KOL/2017[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata30 Jan 2019AY 2002-03

Bench: Shri A.T. Varkey, Jm & Dr.A.L.Saini, Am

For Appellant: Smt. Rituparna SinhaFor Respondent: Dr. P.K. Srihari, CIT, ld.DR
Section 143(3)Section 40Section 40ASection 40A(7)Section 40A(9)Section 43BSection 80H

43B of the Act in violation of provisions of Rule 46A of the I.T. Rules. 4.We shall first take-up additions deleted by ld CIT(A) on account of Transfer Pricing Adjustment. The above summarized and concise grounds relating to transfer pricing adjustmentsare given below for ready reference: Transfer Pricing Grounds (i).Ld.CIT (A) erred in deleting following additions made

D.C.I.T CIR - 6,KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S INTEGRATED COAL MINING LTD, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee in ITA No

ITA 1758/KOL/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Sept 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi

Section 14ASection 43B

43B of the Act. This practice of the assessee is evident from the following chart :- ITA Nos. 1758 & 1804/Kol/13 M/s. Integrated Coal Mining Ltd 16 5.3.2. We hold that the reliance placed by the Learned AR on the decision of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of CIT vs Excel Industries Ltd and CIT vs Mafatlal Industries

MACNEILL ENGINEERING LTD,DCIT, CIR. 1(1) vs. DCIT, CIR. 1(1), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 97/KOL/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 May 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 139(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

43B of the Act is prospective in nature and would apply from AY 2021-22 onwards.Consequently ground no. 2 to 4 are allowed. 6. The issue raised in ground no. 5 is against the order of Ld. CIT(A) setting aside the issue of Rs. 89,269/- to the file of AO for verification

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S MCNALLY BHARATI ENGINEERING CO.LTD., KOLKATA

In the result the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 532/KOL/2012[2007-2008]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata01 Mar 2017AY 2007-2008

Bench: Hon’Ble Sri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Am] I.T.A No.100/Kol/2011 Assessment Year : 2006-07

For Appellant: Shri Soumen Adak, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Vijayendra Kumar, JCIT
Section 115JSection 43B

43B of the Act cannot be read into the provision of section 36(1)(va) of the Act. 10. On appeal by the assessee, the CIT(A) directed the AO to allow the claim of the assessee for deduction and in doing so, the CIT(A) followed the decision of the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-6(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S UNIVERSAL CABLES LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, to sum up

ITA 2143/KOL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata14 Feb 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri M.Balaganesh, Am & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi, Jm] I.T.A No. 1766/Kol/2016 Assessment Year : 2010-11 Universal Cables Ltd. -Vs- Dcit, Circle-6(1), Kolkata [Pan: Aaacu 3547 P] (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A No. 2142 /Kol/2016 Assessment Year : 2010-11 Dcit, Circle-6(1), Kolkata -Vs- Universal Cables Ltd. [Pan: Aaacu 3547 P] (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A No. 1767/Kol/2016 Assessment Year : 2011-12 Universal Cables Ltd. -Vs- Dcit, Circle-6(1), Kolkata [Pan: Aaacu 3547 P] (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A No. 2143/Kol/2016 Assessment Year : 2011-12 Dcit, Circle-6(1), Kolkata -Vs- Universal Cables Ltd. [Pan: Aaacu 3547 P] (Appellant) (Respondent

For Appellant: Shri J.P. Khaitan, Sr. CounselFor Respondent: Shri Sallong Yaden, Addl. CIT
Section 143(3)Section 43B

section 43B and the various judgments of the appellate authorities including of Ho'n'ble Apex Court. Hence, the claim of the assessee for deduction of Rs. 1,01,09,2821- is not allowed. This ground of appeal is dismissed. " We find that even now before us, Ld. counsel for the assessee could not establish that how this is equivalent

UNIVERSAL CABLES LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE-6(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, to sum up

ITA 1766/KOL/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata14 Feb 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri M.Balaganesh, Am & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi, Jm] I.T.A No. 1766/Kol/2016 Assessment Year : 2010-11 Universal Cables Ltd. -Vs- Dcit, Circle-6(1), Kolkata [Pan: Aaacu 3547 P] (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A No. 2142 /Kol/2016 Assessment Year : 2010-11 Dcit, Circle-6(1), Kolkata -Vs- Universal Cables Ltd. [Pan: Aaacu 3547 P] (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A No. 1767/Kol/2016 Assessment Year : 2011-12 Universal Cables Ltd. -Vs- Dcit, Circle-6(1), Kolkata [Pan: Aaacu 3547 P] (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A No. 2143/Kol/2016 Assessment Year : 2011-12 Dcit, Circle-6(1), Kolkata -Vs- Universal Cables Ltd. [Pan: Aaacu 3547 P] (Appellant) (Respondent

For Appellant: Shri J.P. Khaitan, Sr. CounselFor Respondent: Shri Sallong Yaden, Addl. CIT
Section 143(3)Section 43B

section 43B and the various judgments of the appellate authorities including of Ho'n'ble Apex Court. Hence, the claim of the assessee for deduction of Rs. 1,01,09,2821- is not allowed. This ground of appeal is dismissed. " We find that even now before us, Ld. counsel for the assessee could not establish that how this is equivalent

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-6(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S UNIVERSAL CABLES LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, to sum up

ITA 2142/KOL/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata14 Feb 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri M.Balaganesh, Am & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi, Jm] I.T.A No. 1766/Kol/2016 Assessment Year : 2010-11 Universal Cables Ltd. -Vs- Dcit, Circle-6(1), Kolkata [Pan: Aaacu 3547 P] (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A No. 2142 /Kol/2016 Assessment Year : 2010-11 Dcit, Circle-6(1), Kolkata -Vs- Universal Cables Ltd. [Pan: Aaacu 3547 P] (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A No. 1767/Kol/2016 Assessment Year : 2011-12 Universal Cables Ltd. -Vs- Dcit, Circle-6(1), Kolkata [Pan: Aaacu 3547 P] (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A No. 2143/Kol/2016 Assessment Year : 2011-12 Dcit, Circle-6(1), Kolkata -Vs- Universal Cables Ltd. [Pan: Aaacu 3547 P] (Appellant) (Respondent

For Appellant: Shri J.P. Khaitan, Sr. CounselFor Respondent: Shri Sallong Yaden, Addl. CIT
Section 143(3)Section 43B

section 43B and the various judgments of the appellate authorities including of Ho'n'ble Apex Court. Hence, the claim of the assessee for deduction of Rs. 1,01,09,2821- is not allowed. This ground of appeal is dismissed. " We find that even now before us, Ld. counsel for the assessee could not establish that how this is equivalent

UNIVERSAL CABLES LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE-6(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, to sum up

ITA 1767/KOL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata14 Feb 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri M.Balaganesh, Am & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi, Jm] I.T.A No. 1766/Kol/2016 Assessment Year : 2010-11 Universal Cables Ltd. -Vs- Dcit, Circle-6(1), Kolkata [Pan: Aaacu 3547 P] (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A No. 2142 /Kol/2016 Assessment Year : 2010-11 Dcit, Circle-6(1), Kolkata -Vs- Universal Cables Ltd. [Pan: Aaacu 3547 P] (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A No. 1767/Kol/2016 Assessment Year : 2011-12 Universal Cables Ltd. -Vs- Dcit, Circle-6(1), Kolkata [Pan: Aaacu 3547 P] (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A No. 2143/Kol/2016 Assessment Year : 2011-12 Dcit, Circle-6(1), Kolkata -Vs- Universal Cables Ltd. [Pan: Aaacu 3547 P] (Appellant) (Respondent

For Appellant: Shri J.P. Khaitan, Sr. CounselFor Respondent: Shri Sallong Yaden, Addl. CIT
Section 143(3)Section 43B

section 43B and the various judgments of the appellate authorities including of Ho'n'ble Apex Court. Hence, the claim of the assessee for deduction of Rs. 1,01,09,2821- is not allowed. This ground of appeal is dismissed. " We find that even now before us, Ld. counsel for the assessee could not establish that how this is equivalent

BRITANNIA INDUSTRIES LTD,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR-7(1), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 462/KOL/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata06 Mar 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma

Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 35(1)(i)Section 43BSection 56(2)(x)Section 80J

depreciable assets forming part of the block of assets 'building' was computed and offered to tax by the assessee as per section 50 of the Act since the said block of assets was completely exhausted in the year under consideration as a result of sale consideration of the four flats was more than the opening value of the building

EXIDE INDUSTRIES LTD.,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T CIR - 1,KOLKATA., KOLKATA

In the result the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 170/KOL/2013[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Mar 2016AY 2005-06

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am ] Assessment Year : 2005-06

For Appellant: Shri Anup Sinha, AR & Shri Bishan Kr.Seal, ACAFor Respondent: Shri Sachidananda Srivastava, CIT,DR
Section 43BSection 43D

43B(f) is on the Statute Book, but at the same time, it would be entitled to make claim in its return. Keeping in view all these developments, the Coordinate Bench of this Tribunal in the case of Dy. CIT –vs.- BLA Industries Pvt. Ltd. (ITA No. 1434/KOL/2012 dated 16.01.2015) has restored the similar issue to the file