BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

174 results for “depreciation”+ Section 154clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai918Delhi817Bangalore360Chennai258Kolkata174Ahmedabad127Chandigarh65Jaipur63Hyderabad57Pune53Raipur46Surat37Lucknow33Indore28Cochin26Visakhapatnam19Karnataka16Jodhpur16SC14Telangana13Panaji11Amritsar11Cuttack9Kerala7Rajkot7Nagpur6Guwahati6Patna4Agra3Jabalpur3Calcutta3Dehradun2Varanasi2Punjab & Haryana1Himachal Pradesh1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)115Section 15465Section 26362Section 115J48Depreciation48Section 14745Disallowance44Section 80I43Addition to Income40Deduction

ANANDA PAUL,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-50, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, assessee’s appeal stands are allowed

ITA 165/KOL/2015[2007-2008]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Apr 2018AY 2007-2008

Bench: Shri N.V.Vasudevan & Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year :2007-08 Ananda Paul V/S. Acit, Circle-50, Cf-125, Salt Lake City, Manicktala Civic Centre, Kolkata-64 Uttarpan Complex, Ds- [Pan No.Afkpp 2201 D] 2&3, Kolkata-54 .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/By Appellant Shri S. Dasagupta, Addl. Cit-Dr ""यथ" क" ओर से/By Respondent 12-02-2018 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing 20-04-2018 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement आदेश /O R D E R Per Waseem Ahmed:- This Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-Xxxii, Kolkata Dated 05.11.2014. Assessment Was Framed By Acit, Circle-50 Kolkata U/S 147/143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Act’) Vide His Order Dated 30.12.2011 For Assessment Year 2007-08. Shri, S.K. Tulsiyan, Ld. Advocate Appeared On Behalf Of Assessee & Shri S. Dasgupta, Ld. Departmental Representative Appeared On Behalf Of Revenue. 2. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal:- “1) That On The Fats & In The Circumstances Of The Case, The Ld. Cit(A) Erred In Not Treating The Re-Assessment Proceeding U/S 143(3)/147 Of The It Act, 1961 As Invalid, Bad In Law, Unjust & Contrary To The Facts & Law. 2) That On The Facts & In Respect To The Circumstances Of Thee Case, The Ld. Cit(A) Erred In Confirming The Assessment Order Passed U/S. 143(3)/147 Of The It Act, 1961 By The Ld. Ao As Proper & Valid Without Considering The

Section 10(38)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 19(38)

Showing 1–20 of 174 · Page 1 of 9

...
36
Section 14833
Section 14A32

depreciation allowance or any other allowance, as the case may be, for the assessment year concerned (hereafter in this section and in sections 148 to 153 referred to as the relevant assessment year) : [Provided ... [Explanation 4.-- For removal of.. .. I" day of April, 2012] Relevant extract reproduced The foregoing provision suggests that if the assessing officer has the reason

ACIT, CIR-10, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S ICI INDIA LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 2355/KOL/2005[1996-97]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata27 Nov 2015AY 1996-97

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 143(3)

depreciation should be allowed on WDV at the end of the year. Aggrieved, assessee preferred appeal before Ld. CIT(A) who has dismissed the plea of assessee by observing as under:- “2) Capital Gains – The appellant derived long term capital gains of Rs.11.73 crores on the transfer of agro-chemical undertaking. The AO held that the capital gain is required

ICI INDIA LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR-10, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 850/KOL/2007[1996-97]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata27 Nov 2015AY 1996-97

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 143(3)

depreciation should be allowed on WDV at the end of the year. Aggrieved, assessee preferred appeal before Ld. CIT(A) who has dismissed the plea of assessee by observing as under:- “2) Capital Gains – The appellant derived long term capital gains of Rs.11.73 crores on the transfer of agro-chemical undertaking. The AO held that the capital gain is required

DCIT, CIR-10, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S ICI INDIA LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 1021/KOL/2007[1996-97]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata27 Nov 2015AY 1996-97

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 143(3)

depreciation should be allowed on WDV at the end of the year. Aggrieved, assessee preferred appeal before Ld. CIT(A) who has dismissed the plea of assessee by observing as under:- “2) Capital Gains – The appellant derived long term capital gains of Rs.11.73 crores on the transfer of agro-chemical undertaking. The AO held that the capital gain is required

JCIT, (OSD), CIR-8(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S HI-TECH SYSTEMS & SERVICES LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue as well as the cross objections of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1194/KOL/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata07 Mar 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Aby. T. Varkey, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am ] I.T.A Nos. 1194-1196/Kol/2016 Assessment Years : 2006-07, 2007-08 & 2008-09 Jcit, Osd, Circle-8(1), Kolkata -Vs- M/S Hi-Tech Systems & Services Ltd. [Pan: Aaach 6621 F] (Appellant) (Respondent) C.O. Nos. 43-45/Kol/2016 (Arising Out Of I.T.A Nos. 1194-1196/Kol/2016) Assessment Years : 2006-07, 2007-08 & 2008-09 M/S Hi-Tech Systems & Services Ltd. -Vs- Jcit, Osd, Circle-8(1), Kolkata [Pan: Aaach 6621 F] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Arindam Bhattacharjee, Addl. CITFor Respondent: Shri Subash Agarwal, Advocate
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 28Section 29Section 32Section 32(1)Section 80I

section 154 of the Act. 6.2. The ld CITA in this regard held as under:- “I find that in the instant case the appellant initially did not claim any depreciation

JCIT, (OSD), CIR-8(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S HI-TECH SYSTEMS & SERVICES LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue as well as the cross objections of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1195/KOL/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata07 Mar 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Aby. T. Varkey, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am ] I.T.A Nos. 1194-1196/Kol/2016 Assessment Years : 2006-07, 2007-08 & 2008-09 Jcit, Osd, Circle-8(1), Kolkata -Vs- M/S Hi-Tech Systems & Services Ltd. [Pan: Aaach 6621 F] (Appellant) (Respondent) C.O. Nos. 43-45/Kol/2016 (Arising Out Of I.T.A Nos. 1194-1196/Kol/2016) Assessment Years : 2006-07, 2007-08 & 2008-09 M/S Hi-Tech Systems & Services Ltd. -Vs- Jcit, Osd, Circle-8(1), Kolkata [Pan: Aaach 6621 F] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Arindam Bhattacharjee, Addl. CITFor Respondent: Shri Subash Agarwal, Advocate
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 28Section 29Section 32Section 32(1)Section 80I

section 154 of the Act. 6.2. The ld CITA in this regard held as under:- “I find that in the instant case the appellant initially did not claim any depreciation

JCIT, (OSD), CIR-8(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S HI-TECH SYSTEMS & SERVICES LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue as well as the cross objections of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1196/KOL/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata07 Mar 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Aby. T. Varkey, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am ] I.T.A Nos. 1194-1196/Kol/2016 Assessment Years : 2006-07, 2007-08 & 2008-09 Jcit, Osd, Circle-8(1), Kolkata -Vs- M/S Hi-Tech Systems & Services Ltd. [Pan: Aaach 6621 F] (Appellant) (Respondent) C.O. Nos. 43-45/Kol/2016 (Arising Out Of I.T.A Nos. 1194-1196/Kol/2016) Assessment Years : 2006-07, 2007-08 & 2008-09 M/S Hi-Tech Systems & Services Ltd. -Vs- Jcit, Osd, Circle-8(1), Kolkata [Pan: Aaach 6621 F] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Arindam Bhattacharjee, Addl. CITFor Respondent: Shri Subash Agarwal, Advocate
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 28Section 29Section 32Section 32(1)Section 80I

section 154 of the Act. 6.2. The ld CITA in this regard held as under:- “I find that in the instant case the appellant initially did not claim any depreciation

C.M. RAJGARHIA (P) LTD,KOLKATA vs. PCIT-3, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 144/KOL/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata22 Nov 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 115QSection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 154Section 263Section 402Section 77A

depreciation. The issue relating to the buy-back shares and application of the provisions of section 115QA was not under consideration before the ld. Assessing Officer in the rectification proceedings carried out under section 154

ACIT, CIRCLE-5, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S KESORAM INDUSTRIES. LTD, KOLKATA

In the result the revenue’s appeals for A

ITA 1722/KOL/2012[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 Apr 2018AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am]

Section 10(34)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 250

depreciation by way of rectification application under section 154 of the Act). Although the application under section 154 of the Act were

KESORAM INDUSTRIES LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-5(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result the revenue’s appeals for A

ITA 505/KOL/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 Apr 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am]

Section 10(34)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 250

depreciation by way of rectification application under section 154 of the Act). Although the application under section 154 of the Act were

KESORAM INDUSTRIES LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR-5, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result the revenue’s appeals for A

ITA 1188/KOL/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 Apr 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am]

Section 10(34)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 250

depreciation by way of rectification application under section 154 of the Act). Although the application under section 154 of the Act were

D.C.I.T CIR - 5,KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S KESORAM INDUSTRIES LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result the revenue’s appeals for A

ITA 1995/KOL/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 Apr 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am]

Section 10(34)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 250

depreciation by way of rectification application under section 154 of the Act). Although the application under section 154 of the Act were

KESORAM INDUSTRIES LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. ADDL C.I.T RG - 5,KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result the revenue’s appeals for A

ITA 773/KOL/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 Apr 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am]

Section 10(34)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 250

depreciation by way of rectification application under section 154 of the Act). Although the application under section 154 of the Act were

KESORAM INDUSTRIES LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ADD.CIT,RANGE-5,, KOLKATA

In the result the revenue’s appeals for A

ITA 1037/KOL/2012[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 Apr 2018AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am]

Section 10(34)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 250

depreciation by way of rectification application under section 154 of the Act). Although the application under section 154 of the Act were

M/S. SHREE HANUMAN SUGAR & INDUSTRIES LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-XI,KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 341/KOL/2010[1998-99]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata08 Jun 2016AY 1998-99

Bench: : Shri M.Balaganesh & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

For Appellant: Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate, Ld.ARFor Respondent: Md. Ghayas Uddin, JCIT, Ld. Sr.DR
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 154Section 234B

depreciation of the earlier years by revising the total income at Rs. 8,11,970/- and passed an order dt: 18.02.2005 u/s 143(3)/251/154 and no reference was made therein referring to income u/s 115JA by the A.O. 6. Consequently, the A.O issued a notice dt. 23.02.2005 u/s 154 of the Act where he proposed to rectify the order

LANSHREE PRODUCTS SERVICES LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR. 7(1), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 8/KOL/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata12 Jul 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 154

depreciation claimed in terms of clause (iii) of Explanation (1) to Section 115JB of the Act. 1 A.Y. 2013-2014 Lanshree Products & Services Ltd. 2(1). The assessee has also assailed the order of ld. CIT(Appeals) passed under section 154

D.C.I.T CIR - 1,KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S S.M.INTERNATIONAL LTD, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 803/KOL/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata06 Apr 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

Section 143(3)Section 154Section 32

154. In reply, the following explanation was offered by the assessee:- “1. In Finance Act, 2001, there was an modification of section 32 for abolition of restriction of 8 years for carry forward and set off of unabsorbed depreciation

DCIT, CIRCLE-6(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S NATIONAL ENGINEERING INDUSTRIES LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1791/KOL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 Dec 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri J. Sudhakar Reddy, Am & Shri A.T. Varkey, Jm]

Section 92C

depreciation allowed under Section 32(1)(iia) of the Act is a one time benefit to encourage industrialization, and the provisions related to it have to be construed reasonably, liberally and purposively, to make the provision meaningful while granting additional allowance. We are in full agreement with such observations made by the Tribunal. 8 M/s. National Engineering Industries

SECOND VIVEKANANDA BRIDGE TOLLYWAYCO.PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR-2(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

Appeal is partly allowed accordingly

ITA 19/KOL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata11 Jul 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Shri, M. Balaganeshassessment Year :2012-13 Second Vivekananda V/S. Dcit, Circle-2(2), Bridge Tollway Co. Pvt. Aayakar Bhawan, P-7, Ltd., Block Gp, Sector-V, Chowringhee Square, Salt Lake Electronics Kolkata-69 Complex, Kolkata-91 [Pan No.Aahcs 8573 Q] .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Shri S. Rudra, Advocate अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/By Appellant Shri G. Hangshing, Cit-Dr ""यथ" क" ओर से/By Respondent 21-06-2018 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing 11-07-2018 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement आदेश /O R D E R Per S.S.Godara:- This Assessee’S Appeal For Assessment Year 2012-13 Calls Into Question The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Kolkata’S Order Dated 04.11.2016 Passed In Case No.1221/Cit(A)-1/C-2(2)/2015-16 Upholding Assessing Officer’S Action Disallowing Its Depreciation Claimed Of ₹41,99,22,054 In Respect Of Licence To Collect The Toll Revenue Of The Second Vivekananda Bridge (Treated As The Relevant Intangible Asset) & Disallowing Leave Encashment Provision Of ₹1,84,562/- U/S 43B(F) In Assessment Order Dated 11.05.2015, Involving Proceeding U/S 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961; In Short As ‘The Act’. 2. We Come To Former Issue Of Depreciation Disallowance In Respect Of Assessee’S Licence To Collect Toll Charges On The Second Vivekananda Bridge.

Section 143(3)Section 32(1)(ii)Section 43B

section 32(1)(ii) of the Act. The A.O held that it was not be eligible for claiming Depreciation on the WDV of the intangible assets, and disallowed the appellant's claim for Depreciation of Rs.41,99,22,054. The Assessing Officer in his Order, also made referred to the CBDT's Circular No.09/2014 dated 23/04/2014 and held that

M/S RB POLYMERS LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR-4, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee, is allowed

ITA 202/KOL/2016[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Dec 2017AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri A.T. Varkey, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.202/Kol/2016 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2009-10) Rb Polymers Ltd. Vs. Cit(A)-2, Kolkata 25, R.N. Mukherjee Road, 4Th Aayakarbhawan, P-7, Floor, Suite-F, Kolkata – 1. Chowringhee Square, Kolkata-69. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. : Aabcr 3117 R (अपीलाथ"/Assessee) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. िनधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By : Shri Subash Agarwal, Advocate. राज"वक"ओरसे /Respondent By : Shri Saurabh Kumar, Addl. Cit(Dr) सुनवाईक"तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 16/11/2017 घोषणाक"तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 15/12/2017 आदेश / O R D E R Per Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Am: The Captioned Appeal Filed By The Assessee, Pertaining To Assessment Year 2009-10, Is Directed Against The Order Passed By The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Kolkata, In Appeal No.1386/Cit(A)-2/Cir-4/2014- 15, Dated 22.12.2015, Which In Turn Arises Out Of An Order Passed By The Assessing Officer Under Section 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961, (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’), Dated 28.12.2011. 2.The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal: 1.That The Impugned Order Dated 22Nd December 2015 Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax,(Appeals) - 2 Is Liable To Be Quashed Since It Has Been Passed In Haste Without Application Of Mind & Without Considering The Evidences Furnished & Submissions Made By The Appellant In Course Of Hearing Of The Appeal.

For Appellant: Shri Subash Agarwal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Saurabh Kumar, Addl. CIT(DR)
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 32

154 of the Act. The ld. CIT(A) observed that the issue is to be decided as to what should be the treatment of unabsorbeddepreciation before amendment of section 32(2) w.e.f. 1st April, 2002, as the amendment wasnot retrospective but prospective. Before amendment, the treatment of brought forwardunabsorbed depreciation