BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

11 results for “depreciation”+ Section 11Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai31Delhi21Kolkata11Bangalore11Lucknow8SC7Indore6Karnataka4Chennai4Cuttack3Pune3Visakhapatnam2Hyderabad1Chandigarh1Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 80I12Section 143(3)10Depreciation9Disallowance9Section 248Deduction8Section 80G5Set Off of Losses5Section 41(2)4Section 10A

LMJ INTERNATIONAL LTD.,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T CIR - 8,KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed, while the appeal of the assessee is treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 230/KOL/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata21 Mar 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

Section 80I

11A), he contended that even if there are no transactions with the third party, assessee is eligible for deduction under section 80IB. In support of this contention, he relied on the decision of the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court in the case of CIT –vs.- ITC Limited [236 taxman 612], wherein it was held that deduction under section 80IA cannot

DCIT, CIRCLE - 2, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. LMJ LOGISTICS LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal stands partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 1800/KOL/2010[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Jun 2017AY 2007-08
4
Section 10B4
House Property4

Bench: Shri N.V.Vasudevan & Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year :2007-08

Section 143(3)Section 80Section 80BSection 80I

Depreciation Rs.11,81,721.00 Rs.37,78,784.00 Net profit Rs.1,60,30,614 (a) Therefore, AO worked out net profit of ₹160,30,614/- as discussed above. The AO further observed that the assessee in respect of its unit at Gandhidham has already declared profit for a sum of ₹51,18,652/- and accordingly opined that

A.C.I.T., CIRCLE-12(2), KOLKATA vs. M/S UNIWORTH TEXTILES LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is partly allowed

ITA 85/KOL/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 May 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice- & Shri Rajesh Kumar]

Section 32Section 41(2)

depreciation is claimed under clause (i) of sub-section (1) of section 32; and which has been used for the purposes of business which is sold, discarded, demolished or destroyed and the moneys payable in respect of such building, machinery, plant or furniture, as the case may be, together with the amount of scrap value, if any, exceeds the written

PATTON INTERNATIONAL LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. PCIT-1, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 261/KOL/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata22 Nov 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2017-18 M/S. Patton International Principal Commissioner Of Ltd., C/O Jain Vinod K & Income-Tax, Kolkata-1. Associates, 41A, A. J. C. Vs Bose Road, Diamond . Prestige Nirman, 6Th Floor, Suite No.613, Kolkata- 700017 (Pan: Aabcp7901M) (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Vinod Kumar Jain, ARFor Respondent: Shri Amitava Bhattacharyya, CIT, DR
Section 143(3)Section 197Section 263Section 40Section 80G

11A(4). To remove any doubts in this regard, it is reiterated that any approval under section 80G(5) on or after 1.10.2009 would be a one time approval which would be valid till it is withdrawn.” 3.3. On the second issue relating to payment of commission to the Managing/Whole time Directors namely Shri H. P. Budhia and Shri Sanjay

ITO, WARD-1(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S GKW LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal stands dismissed

ITA 432/KOL/2012[1998-99]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata24 Aug 2016AY 1998-99

Bench: Shri N.V.Vasudevan & Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year :1998-99 Ito Ward-1(3), Room V/S. M/S Gkw Ltd., Central No. 1A, 4Th Floor, Plaza, 2/6 Sarat Bose Aayakar Bhawan, P-7, Road, Office Space No. Chowringhee Suquare, 406, 4Thfloor, Kolkata-20 Kolkata-700 069 [Pan No. Aabcg 0671 K] .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 145A

section 143(3) of the Act after making certain additions/ disallowances at NIL. 4. The first issue raised by Revenue in this appeal is that the learned CIT(A) erred in allowing the carried forward loss of Rs. 29,09,04,771/-. 4.1 The assessee, for the year under consideration has filed its return of income showing the losses

ITO(EXEMPTION), WARD-1(2), KOLKATA, KOLKTA vs. DEV SANGHA SEVA PRATISTHAN, KOLKATA

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 1254/KOL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Jun 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Sainiassessment Year :2013-14 Income Tax Officer V/S. Dev Sangha Seva (Exemption), Ward-1(2), Pratisthan, 28/2A, Hare 10B, Middle Ton Row, Kesto Sett Lane, Kolkata-71 Kolkata-700 050 [Pan No.Aaaad 1567 C] .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent S.M.S Taoheed, Addl. Cit-Sr-Dr अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/By Appellant Shr K.M. Roy, Ar ""यथ" क" ओर से/By Respondent 05-06-2018 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing 13-06-2018 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement आदेश /O R D E R Per S.S.Godara:- This Revenue’S Appeal For Assessment Year 2013-14 Arises Against Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-25. Kolkata’S Order Dated 17.03.2017 In Case No. Cit(A)-25 Kolkata/Fy 2016-17/ Dev Sangha Seva Pratishan, Ay 2013-14_143(3)_B-1B/432, In Proceedings U/S 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961; In Short, ‘The Act’. 2. The Revenue’S Former Substantive Ground Pleads That The Cit(A) Has Erred In Law As Well As On Facts In Reversing The Assessing Officer’S Action Deleting Assessee’S Administrative & Establishment Expenses Disallowance Of ₹56,08,823/- As Application Of Its Case For Charitable Purpose U/S 11A Of The Act With The Following Detailed Discussions:- “5. Accumulation / Setting-Apart U/S. 11(1)(A): Issue Of ‘Administrative & Establishment Expenses’. [Ground Of Appeal No.1] ₹56,08,823/-

Section 11(1)(a)Section 11ASection 12ASection 143(3)

11A of the Act with the following detailed discussions:- “5. Accumulation / setting-apart u/s. 11(1)(a): Issue of ‘administrative and establishment expenses’. [Ground of appeal No.1] ₹56,08,823/- ITA No.1254/Kol/2017 A.Y. 2013-14 ITO (Ex), Ward-1(2), Kol. Vs. Dev Sangha Seva Pratisthan Page 2 5.1 It will be better appreciated if at the outset the relevant

I.T.O WD - 2(3),KOLKATA., KOLKATA vs. M/S LAST PEAK DATA PVT LTD., KOLKATA

In the result the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 154/KOL/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata30 Oct 2015AY 2009-10

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Am ]

For Appellant: Shri Vasant SubramanyanFor Respondent: Shri Niraj Kumar, CIT(DR)
Section 10ASection 10BSection 115JSection 14

depreciation, fee paid for increase in share capital of Rs.7,21,02,983. 45. The plea of the Assessee before CIT(A) was that from the income eligible for deduction u/s.10AA of the Act there can be no set off of carried forward loss and deduction u/s.10AA of the Act has to be allowed on the said income only

A.C.I.T CIR - 30,KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S TAPASYA ENTERPRISES, KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 2098/KOL/2013[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Oct 2017AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Aby.T Varkey & Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 143(3)Section 24

11A, Palm Avenue, Kolkata-68 Kolkatda-19 [PAN No.AADFT 1366 M] .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent None आवेदक क" ओर से/By Assessee Shri Saurabh Kumar, Addl. CIT-DR राज"व क" ओर से/By Respondent 05-10-2017 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing 13-10-2017 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement आदेश

A.C.I.T CIR - 30,KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S TAPASYA ENTERPRISES, KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 2097/KOL/2013[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Oct 2017AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Aby.T Varkey & Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 143(3)Section 24

11A, Palm Avenue, Kolkata-68 Kolkatda-19 [PAN No.AADFT 1366 M] .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent None आवेदक क" ओर से/By Assessee Shri Saurabh Kumar, Addl. CIT-DR राज"व क" ओर से/By Respondent 05-10-2017 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing 13-10-2017 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement आदेश

A.C.I.T CIR - 30,KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S TAPASYA ENTERPRISES, KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 2099/KOL/2013[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Oct 2017AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Aby.T Varkey & Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 143(3)Section 24

11A, Palm Avenue, Kolkata-68 Kolkatda-19 [PAN No.AADFT 1366 M] .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent None आवेदक क" ओर से/By Assessee Shri Saurabh Kumar, Addl. CIT-DR राज"व क" ओर से/By Respondent 05-10-2017 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing 13-10-2017 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement आदेश

A.C.I.T CIR - 30,KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S TAPASYA ENTERPRISES, KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 2100/KOL/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Oct 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Aby.T Varkey & Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 143(3)Section 24

11A, Palm Avenue, Kolkata-68 Kolkatda-19 [PAN No.AADFT 1366 M] .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent None आवेदक क" ओर से/By Assessee Shri Saurabh Kumar, Addl. CIT-DR राज"व क" ओर से/By Respondent 05-10-2017 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing 13-10-2017 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement आदेश