BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

1,210 results for “depreciation”+ Addition to Incomeclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai5,356Delhi5,006Chennai1,850Bangalore1,633Ahmedabad1,233Kolkata1,210Pune772Hyderabad589Jaipur555Chandigarh397Cochin265Indore242Surat240Visakhapatnam222Raipur222Cuttack178Amritsar175Karnataka158Lucknow108Rajkot105Nagpur90Ranchi75Guwahati75Jodhpur72SC63Telangana59Dehradun44Agra38Panaji35Patna31Calcutta29Kerala26Allahabad23Jabalpur16Varanasi11Punjab & Haryana10Rajasthan6Orissa5Gauhati2D.K. JAIN H.L. DATTU JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1S. B. SINHA MARKANDEY KATJU1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Tripura1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)101Addition to Income63Disallowance56Section 80I53Section 14A52Depreciation52Deduction43Section 14737Section 25033Section 115J

DCIT, CIRCLE - 11(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. GRAPHITE INDIA LTD., KOLKATA

ITA 472/KOL/2018[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata22 Nov 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am I.T.A Nos.472 & 474 & C.O Nos.64 & 66/Kol/2018 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2007-08 & 2008-09) Dcit, Circle-11(1), Kolkata Vs. M/S. Graphite India Ltd. 31, Chowringhee Road, Kolkata- 700016. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaacc0457C (Appellant) .. (Respondent/Cross-Objector)

For Appellant: Dr. P. K. Srihari, CIT(DR)For Respondent: Ms. Ruchira Lakhotia, ACA
Section 143(3)Section 32(1)(iia)

additional depreciation disallowance by quoting section 32(1)(iia) in the twin assessment years (supra) deserves to be confirmed. We order accordingly. The Revenue’s sole substantive grievance as well with main appeal ITA No.471/Kol/2018 in assessment year 2007-08 and former substantive ground in latter assessment year 2008-09 fail accordingly. 6. The Revenue’s latter substantive ground

DCIT, CIRCLE - 11(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. GRAPHITE INDIA LTD., KOLKATA

Showing 1–20 of 1,210 · Page 1 of 61

...
30
Section 14828
Section 43B25
ITA 474/KOL/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata22 Nov 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am I.T.A Nos.472 & 474 & C.O Nos.64 & 66/Kol/2018 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2007-08 & 2008-09) Dcit, Circle-11(1), Kolkata Vs. M/S. Graphite India Ltd. 31, Chowringhee Road, Kolkata- 700016. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaacc0457C (Appellant) .. (Respondent/Cross-Objector)

For Appellant: Dr. P. K. Srihari, CIT(DR)For Respondent: Ms. Ruchira Lakhotia, ACA
Section 143(3)Section 32(1)(iia)

additional depreciation disallowance by quoting section 32(1)(iia) in the twin assessment years (supra) deserves to be confirmed. We order accordingly. The Revenue’s sole substantive grievance as well with main appeal ITA No.471/Kol/2018 in assessment year 2007-08 and former substantive ground in latter assessment year 2008-09 fail accordingly. 6. The Revenue’s latter substantive ground

DAMODAR VALLEY CORPORATION,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR-9(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1458/KOL/2015[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Jul 2016AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh, Am & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm]

For Appellant: Shri D. S. Damle, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Niraj Kumar, CIT, DR
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 263Section 32(1)(ii)Section 32(1)(iia)

Income tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) for AY 2011-12 vide his order dated 28.03.2014. 2. The only issue to be decided in this appeal is as to whether the ld CIT is justified in invoking revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Act in the context of allowability of additional depreciation

DCIT, CIRCLE - 1, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. GLOSTER JUTE MILLS LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 95/KOL/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata01 Mar 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Hon’Ble Sri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Am] I.T.A No.95/Kol/2011 Assessment Year : 2007-08

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr.AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sital Chandra Das, JCIT

addition of Rs.31 ,68,895/-.” 34. Section 115JB of the Act provides that notwithstanding anything contained in any other provision of the Act, where in the case of an assessee, being a company, the income-tax, payable on the total income as computed under this Act in respect of any previous year relevant to the assessment year commencing

EASTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED ,PASHCHIM BARDHAMAN vs. D.C.I.T.,CIRCLE-3, ASANSOL

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 376/KOL/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Feb 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am]

Section 147Section 148

Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), the sole issue involved on merits is against the action of the Ld. CIT(A) in sustaining the disallowance of additional depreciation

EASTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED ,PASHCHIM BARDHAMAN vs. D.C.I.T.,CIRCLE-3, ASANSOL

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 377/KOL/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am]

Section 147Section 148

Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), the sole issue involved on merits is against the action of the Ld. CIT(A) in sustaining the disallowance of additional depreciation

DCIT, CIRCLE-6(1), KOLKATA vs. M/S NATIONAL ENGINEERING INDUSTRIES LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 2109/KOL/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Dec 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rajesh Kumari.T.A. No.2109/Kol/2019 Assessment Year: 2015-16 Dcit, Circle-6(1), Kolkata………………………………………….……Appellant Vs. M/S National Engineering Industrial Ltd…..……..........……...…..…..Respondent 11Th Floor, Birla Building, 9/1, R.N. Mukherjee Road, Bbd Bagh, Kolkata-1. [Pan: Aaacn9969L] Appearances By: Shri Akkal Dudhwewala, Fca & Shri Rakesh Jhunjhunwala, Ar Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Amitava Bhattacharya, Cit-Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : December 13, 2021 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : December 16, 2021 Hearing Through Video Conferencing Order Per Sanjay Garg: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Revenue Against The Order Dated 17.06.2019 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Kolkata [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’). The Revenue In This Appeal Has Taken The Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1. Whether On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case, The Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred In Law In Allowing The Claim Of Balance Additional Depreciation On The Assets Which Were Put To Use In Earlier Year. 2. That The Appellant Craves For Leave To Add To Delete, Modify Any Of The Grounds Of Appeal Before Or At The Time Of Hearing..” 2. At The Outset, It Is Noticed That The Appeal Filed By The Revenue Is Time-Barred By 18 Days. A Separate Application For Condonation Of The Said Delay Has Been Filed, Wherein Reasons For The Delay In Filing This Appeal Have Been Mentioned. Considering The Above Reasons, We Condone The Delay.

Section 143(3)Section 32(1)Section 32(1)(iia)

Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’). The Revenue in this appeal has taken the following grounds of appeal: “1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law in allowing the claim of balance additional depreciation

M/S GENERAL POLYTEX PVT. LTD.,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 1(1), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 166/KOL/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Mar 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Boradi.T.A. No. 166/Kol/2022 Assessment Year: 2015-2016 M/S. General Polytex Pvt. Limited,...........Appellant 0/2171-72, Malviniwadi, Sonifalia, Bhagatalav, Gujarat-395003 [Pan: Aaccb5335L] -Vs.- Income Tax Officer,...............................Respondent Ward-1(1), Kolkata, Aayakar Bhawan, P-7, Chowringhee Square, Kolkata-700069 Appearances By: Shri M.K. Patwari, Fca, Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri Vijay Kumar, Addl. Cit, Sr. D.R., Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing : March 07, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : March 16, 2023 O R D E R

Section 143(2)Section 271Section 32

additional depreciation being plant & machinery installed is Rs.20,80,12,326/-. Accordingly, depreciation allowable for the year under Income Tax Act, 1961 as reported

ACIT, CIRCLE-2, ASANSOL, ASANSOL vs. M/S EASTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED, BURDWAN

In the result, this ground of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 999/KOL/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Jan 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Sri A. T. Varkeyi.T.A. No. 1010/Kol/2015 Assessment Year: 2009-10 Eastern Coalfields Ltd....................………………..…………….………………………………..………Assessee [Pan :Aaace 7590 E] Jcit, R-2, Asansol………………..…………………………………………………….……………………....Revenue &

Section 32(1)(iia)Section 35ESection 40A(3)Section 40A(9)

additional depreciation claimed by the assessee and as such a sum of Rs.13,23,40,200/- is added to the total income

DCIT, CIR-2, ASANSOL, ASANSOL vs. M/S EASTERN COALFIELS LTD., BURDWAN

In the result, this ground of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1015/KOL/2015[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Jan 2019AY 2009-2010

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Sri A. T. Varkeyi.T.A. No. 1010/Kol/2015 Assessment Year: 2009-10 Eastern Coalfields Ltd....................………………..…………….………………………………..………Assessee [Pan :Aaace 7590 E] Jcit, R-2, Asansol………………..…………………………………………………….……………………....Revenue &

Section 32(1)(iia)Section 35ESection 40A(3)Section 40A(9)

additional depreciation claimed by the assessee and as such a sum of Rs.13,23,40,200/- is added to the total income

EASTERN COALFIELDS LTD.,BURDWAN vs. JCIT, R-2, ASANSOL, ASANSOL

In the result, this ground of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1010/KOL/2015[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Jan 2019AY 2009-2010

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Sri A. T. Varkeyi.T.A. No. 1010/Kol/2015 Assessment Year: 2009-10 Eastern Coalfields Ltd....................………………..…………….………………………………..………Assessee [Pan :Aaace 7590 E] Jcit, R-2, Asansol………………..…………………………………………………….……………………....Revenue &

Section 32(1)(iia)Section 35ESection 40A(3)Section 40A(9)

additional depreciation claimed by the assessee and as such a sum of Rs.13,23,40,200/- is added to the total income

EASTERN COALFILELDS LTD.,,BURDWAN vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2,, ASANSOL

In the result, this ground of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 916/KOL/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Jan 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Sri A. T. Varkeyi.T.A. No. 1010/Kol/2015 Assessment Year: 2009-10 Eastern Coalfields Ltd....................………………..…………….………………………………..………Assessee [Pan :Aaace 7590 E] Jcit, R-2, Asansol………………..…………………………………………………….……………………....Revenue &

Section 32(1)(iia)Section 35ESection 40A(3)Section 40A(9)

additional depreciation claimed by the assessee and as such a sum of Rs.13,23,40,200/- is added to the total income

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S RAMKRISHNA FORGINGS LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the In the result, both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the cross- objection of the assessee is allowed in part

ITA 113/KOL/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Mar 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Sri Aby T. Varkey) Assessment Year: 2009-10

Section 2Section 250

additional depreciation depreciation depreciation has has has to to to be be be allowed allowed allowed in in in the the the following following following year year year as as as unabsorbed unabsorbed unabsorbed depreciation.........amendment made by Finance Act, 2016 [ proviso to Section 32 (1 depreciation.........amendment made by Finance Act, 2016 [ proviso to Section 32 (1 depreciation.........amendment

DCIT, CIR. 11(1), KOLKATA vs. TIRUPATI SUGARS LTD, KOLKATA

In the result the appeal is Partly Allowed

ITA 262/KOL/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 Jul 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 143(2)Section 32(1)(iia)

income filed for assessment year 2012-13 on 27.09.2012. The case selected for scrutiny through CASS followed by serving of statutory notice u/s 143(2) and 142(1) of the Act. During the course of assessment proceedings, the ld. AO examined the assessee’s claim for additional depreciation

DCIT, CIR-12(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. HINDUSTAN GUM & CHEMICALS LTD., KOLKATA

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 891/KOL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 May 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Sainiassessment Year :2012-13

Section 143(3)

depreciation was allowed at the reduced rate of 10% in the computation of income for AY 2011-12. While filing the return of income the AY 2012-13 the assessee claimed the deduction for remaining 10% of the additional

WEST BENGAL STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION CO. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. THE DCIT, CIR-2, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed while both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 872/KOL/2015[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 Oct 2017AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Am & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm ] I.T.A. No. 871 & 872/Kol/2015 Assessment Year 2010-11 & 2011-12 West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. ...........................Appellant Bidyut Bhawan, Sector – Ii, Block Dj, Bidhan Nagar, Kolkata – 700 091 [Pan: Aaacw6953H] Dcit, Circle 2(2) Kolkata,...................…………………………………………Respondent Aayakar Bhawan, 7Th Floor, P-7, Chowringhee Square, Kolkata - 700069 I.T.A. No. 1001 & 1002/Kol/2015 Assessment Year 2010-11 & 2011-12 Dcit, Circle 2(2) Kolkata,...................…………………………………………Appellant Aayakar Bhawan, 7Th Floor, P-7, Chowringhee Square, Kolkata - 700069 West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. ....................Respondent Bidyut Bhawan, Sector – Ii, Block Dj, Bidhan Nagar, Kolkata – 700 091 [Pan: Aaacw6953H] Appearances By: Shri Anand R. Baiwar, Cit Appearing On Behalf Of The Revenue. Shri N.K. Poddar, Sr. Advocate Appearing On Behalf Of The Assessee. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : September 12, 2017 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : October 31, 2017 Order Shri P.M. Jagtap, Am These Four Appeals, Two Filed By The Assessee Being Ita No. 871 & 872/Kol/2015 & Two Filed By The Revenue Being Ita No. 1001 & 1002/Kol/2015, Are Cross-Appeals Which Are Directed Against Two

Section 2Section 32(1)(iia)

additional depreciation under section 32(1)(iia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 amounting to Rs. 34,02,72,223/-. 3. The assessee

DCIT, CIR-2(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S WEST BENGAL STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION CO. LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed while both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1001/KOL/2015[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 Oct 2017AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Am & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm ] I.T.A. No. 871 & 872/Kol/2015 Assessment Year 2010-11 & 2011-12 West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. ...........................Appellant Bidyut Bhawan, Sector – Ii, Block Dj, Bidhan Nagar, Kolkata – 700 091 [Pan: Aaacw6953H] Dcit, Circle 2(2) Kolkata,...................…………………………………………Respondent Aayakar Bhawan, 7Th Floor, P-7, Chowringhee Square, Kolkata - 700069 I.T.A. No. 1001 & 1002/Kol/2015 Assessment Year 2010-11 & 2011-12 Dcit, Circle 2(2) Kolkata,...................…………………………………………Appellant Aayakar Bhawan, 7Th Floor, P-7, Chowringhee Square, Kolkata - 700069 West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. ....................Respondent Bidyut Bhawan, Sector – Ii, Block Dj, Bidhan Nagar, Kolkata – 700 091 [Pan: Aaacw6953H] Appearances By: Shri Anand R. Baiwar, Cit Appearing On Behalf Of The Revenue. Shri N.K. Poddar, Sr. Advocate Appearing On Behalf Of The Assessee. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : September 12, 2017 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : October 31, 2017 Order Shri P.M. Jagtap, Am These Four Appeals, Two Filed By The Assessee Being Ita No. 871 & 872/Kol/2015 & Two Filed By The Revenue Being Ita No. 1001 & 1002/Kol/2015, Are Cross-Appeals Which Are Directed Against Two

Section 2Section 32(1)(iia)

additional depreciation under section 32(1)(iia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 amounting to Rs. 34,02,72,223/-. 3. The assessee

WEST BENGAL STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION CO. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. THE DCIT, CIR-2, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed while both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 871/KOL/2015[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 Oct 2017AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Am & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm ] I.T.A. No. 871 & 872/Kol/2015 Assessment Year 2010-11 & 2011-12 West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. ...........................Appellant Bidyut Bhawan, Sector – Ii, Block Dj, Bidhan Nagar, Kolkata – 700 091 [Pan: Aaacw6953H] Dcit, Circle 2(2) Kolkata,...................…………………………………………Respondent Aayakar Bhawan, 7Th Floor, P-7, Chowringhee Square, Kolkata - 700069 I.T.A. No. 1001 & 1002/Kol/2015 Assessment Year 2010-11 & 2011-12 Dcit, Circle 2(2) Kolkata,...................…………………………………………Appellant Aayakar Bhawan, 7Th Floor, P-7, Chowringhee Square, Kolkata - 700069 West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. ....................Respondent Bidyut Bhawan, Sector – Ii, Block Dj, Bidhan Nagar, Kolkata – 700 091 [Pan: Aaacw6953H] Appearances By: Shri Anand R. Baiwar, Cit Appearing On Behalf Of The Revenue. Shri N.K. Poddar, Sr. Advocate Appearing On Behalf Of The Assessee. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : September 12, 2017 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : October 31, 2017 Order Shri P.M. Jagtap, Am These Four Appeals, Two Filed By The Assessee Being Ita No. 871 & 872/Kol/2015 & Two Filed By The Revenue Being Ita No. 1001 & 1002/Kol/2015, Are Cross-Appeals Which Are Directed Against Two

Section 2Section 32(1)(iia)

additional depreciation under section 32(1)(iia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 amounting to Rs. 34,02,72,223/-. 3. The assessee

DCIT, CIR-2(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S WEST BENGAL STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION CO. LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed while both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1002/KOL/2015[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 Oct 2017AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Am & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm ] I.T.A. No. 871 & 872/Kol/2015 Assessment Year 2010-11 & 2011-12 West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. ...........................Appellant Bidyut Bhawan, Sector – Ii, Block Dj, Bidhan Nagar, Kolkata – 700 091 [Pan: Aaacw6953H] Dcit, Circle 2(2) Kolkata,...................…………………………………………Respondent Aayakar Bhawan, 7Th Floor, P-7, Chowringhee Square, Kolkata - 700069 I.T.A. No. 1001 & 1002/Kol/2015 Assessment Year 2010-11 & 2011-12 Dcit, Circle 2(2) Kolkata,...................…………………………………………Appellant Aayakar Bhawan, 7Th Floor, P-7, Chowringhee Square, Kolkata - 700069 West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. ....................Respondent Bidyut Bhawan, Sector – Ii, Block Dj, Bidhan Nagar, Kolkata – 700 091 [Pan: Aaacw6953H] Appearances By: Shri Anand R. Baiwar, Cit Appearing On Behalf Of The Revenue. Shri N.K. Poddar, Sr. Advocate Appearing On Behalf Of The Assessee. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : September 12, 2017 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : October 31, 2017 Order Shri P.M. Jagtap, Am These Four Appeals, Two Filed By The Assessee Being Ita No. 871 & 872/Kol/2015 & Two Filed By The Revenue Being Ita No. 1001 & 1002/Kol/2015, Are Cross-Appeals Which Are Directed Against Two

Section 2Section 32(1)(iia)

additional depreciation under section 32(1)(iia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 amounting to Rs. 34,02,72,223/-. 3. The assessee

M/S. PRATAP POLYSACKS LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-5(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1527/KOL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata01 Mar 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Hon’Ble Sri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Am] I.T.A No. 1527/Kol/2016 Assessment Year : 2012-13 M/S Pratap Polysacks Limited -Vs.- D.C.I.T., Circle-5(1) Kolkata Kolkata [Pan : Aabcp 6949 J] (Respondent) (Appellant) For The Appellant: Shri Sunil Surana, Ar For The Respondent : Shri Saurabh Kumar, Addl. Cit, Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing : 27.02.2018. Date Of Pronouncement : 01.03.2018. Order Per N.V.Vasudevan, Jm This Is An Appeal By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 11.05.2016 Of C.I.T.(A)-2, Kolkata Relating To A.Y.2012-13. 2. Ground Nos. 1, 6 & 7 Are General In Nature & Call For No Specific Adjudication. 3. Ground No.2 Raised By The Assessee Reads As Follows :- “2. For That The Ld. C.I.T(A) Erred In Confirming The Disallowance Of Rs.13,40,961/- Out Of Claim Of Depreciation & Additional Depreciation S= Electric Installations Being Integral Part Of Plant & Machinery & Wrongly Considered By The Ao As Electric Installations Simplicitor.” 4. The Assessee Is A Company Engaged In The Business Of Manufacturing Hdpe/Pp Woven Socks & Aluminium Composite Panel. In The Course Of Assessment Proceedings The Ao Noticed That The Assessee Had Claimed 15% Of Depreciation & 20% Additional Depreciation On Additions To The Block Of Assets “Plant & Machinery” Of Rs.1,07,34,917/- & Rs.47,737/-. The Sum Of Rs.1,07,34,917/- Was The Cost Of Electrical Installations & Rs.47,737/- Was The Cost Of Fire Extinguisher. According To The Ao The Electrical Installations Were Not To Be Regarded As Plant & Machinery But Has To Be Regarded As Falling Within The Block Of Assets “Furniture & Fitting Including

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Surana, ARFor Respondent: Shri Saurabh Kumar, Addl. CIT, Sr.DR

depreciation as per Income Tax Act, is allowable @ 10%. Since the cable does not come under the Block plant or machinery, additional