BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

32 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 80P(1)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Pune139Chennai121Mumbai119Bangalore87Panaji64Cochin44Kolkata32Raipur28Hyderabad23Jaipur22Ahmedabad18Chandigarh18Lucknow17Karnataka15Delhi14Nagpur13Rajkot11Indore8Visakhapatnam7Calcutta2Amritsar1Guwahati1SC1

Key Topics

Section 80P55Limitation/Time-bar20Deduction17Condonation of Delay17Section 143(1)15Section 25013Section 8010Section 139(1)10Addition to Income

PAHALAMPUR SAMABAY KRISHI UNNAYAN SAMITY LTD., ,HOOGHLY vs. ITO, WARD 23(1), , HOOGHLY

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 887/KOL/2025[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Sept 2025AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rajesh Kumarassessment Year: 2019-20 Pahalampur Samabay Krishi Ito, Ward-23(1), Hooghly Unnayan Ltd.

For Appellant: Shri Somnath Ghosh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S. B. Chakraborthy, Sr. DR
Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 148Section 153ASection 80Section 80P

Showing 1–20 of 32 · Page 1 of 2

9
Section 115J8
Section 1397
Section 686

B. Chakraborthy, Sr. DR represented on behalf of the revenue. 3. The appeal has been filed by the assessee with a delay of 967 days. The assessee has filed an application for condonation of delay. The reasons in the application are plausible and valid. Consequently, the delay in filing the appeal is hereby condoned and we proceed to dispose

NABARUN S K U S LTD.,NADIA vs. I.T.O.WARD-41(1), KRISHNANAGAR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 89/KOL/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata01 Dec 2025AY 2018-19
Section 119Section 139Section 80Section 80ASection 80P

Condonation of delay under clause (b) of sub-section (2) of section 119 of\nthe Income-tax Act, 1961 for returns of income claiming deduction u/s 80P of the\nAct for various assessment years from AY 2018-19 to AY 2022-23-Reg\nSection 80P of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereafter referred to as 'Act') provides\nfor deduction

DURGAMONDAP SAMABAY KRISHI UNNAYN SAMATI LTD. ,ITO, WARD NO-49(1), KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD NO- 49(1), KOLKATA. , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1153/KOL/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata24 Jul 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Pradip Kumar Choubey & Sri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 80Section 80ASection 80P

delay is hereby condoned and the matter is taken up for adjudication. 2. Before us, ld. Counsel for the assessee has argued that Section 143(1)(a)(v) of the Act is the critical part of the statute which would determine whether any assessee claiming relief u/s 80P of the Act could be denied the benefit of the same

BANSABATI CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., ,HOOGHLY vs. PRINCIPAL CIT - 8, KOLKATA , KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 271/KOL/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata03 Dec 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri J. Sudhakar Reddy, Am & Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

Section 263Section 80P

condone the delay and proceed to hear the appeal on merits. 3. By preferring Ground nos. 1 and 2, the assessee bank has assailed the action of Ld PCIT to have invoked the revisional jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Act without satisfying the condition precedent as prescribed in the Statute. According to assessee, on a perusal of the impugned order

SRIRAMPUR NITYANANDA SAMABAY KRISHI UNNAYAN SAMITY LTD.,TAMLUK, PURBA MEDNIPUR vs. I.T.O., WARD - 27(3),, HALDIA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 496/KOL/2025[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata25 Aug 2025AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 142(1)Section 144Section 250Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

80P of the said Act by condone the delay under section 119 (2) (b) of the said Act. That the Hon’ble Tribunal Bench would set aside the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Appeals and learned assessing officer. That it is against the said impugned order the Appellant preferred the instant Appeal before the Hon’ble Tribunal with

M/S COAL INDIA LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR-5(1), , KOLKATA

ITA 1407/KOL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Jan 2026AY 2014-15
Section 115J

condone\nthe delay and admit the appeal for adjudication.\n1.3 Since the issues are common, all the eight appeals were heard\ntogether and are being decided vide this common order for the sake of\nconvenience and brevity.\n2.\nThe assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal in ITA No.\n466/KOL/2018:\n“1) That on the facts and circumstances

DCIT, CIRCLE - 5(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. COAL INDIA LIMITED , KOLKATA

ITA 623/KOL/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Jan 2026AY 2012-13
Section 115JSection 250

condone the delay and admit the appeal for adjudication. 1.3 Since the issues are common, all the eight appeals were heard together and are being decided vide this common order for the sake of convenience and brevity. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal in ITA No. 466/KOL/2018: “1) That on the facts and circumstances

PANDAVESWAR COLLIERY EMPLOYEES COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,PANDAVESWAR vs. ITO, WARD 2(4), , DURGAPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as\nwithdrawn

ITA 287/KOL/2025[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata01 Sept 2025AY 2018-2019
Section 119(2)(b)Section 139(1)Section 142(1)Section 148Section 250Section 80PSection 80P(2)(d)

condonation of delay in filing the return and for claiming deductions. The assessee's representative requested the appeal to be treated as not pressed, with liberty to file a fresh appeal.", "result": "Dismissed as withdrawn", "sections": ["148", "142(1)", "80P(2)(a)(i)", "80P(2)(d)", "139(1)", "119(2)(b

NAKASHIPARA THANA CO-OPERATIVE AGRIL MARKETING SOCIETY LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. ASSTT. DIRECTOR, CPC, BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 504/KOL/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata08 Sept 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: : Sri Manish Boradआयकर अपील सं"या/ I.T.A. No. 504/कोल/2021 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2019-20 Nakashipara Thana Co-Operative Agril Marketing (अपीलाथ")/Appellant Society Limited………………….…………………. [Pan: Aaban 3131 H] Vs. Adit, Cpc, Bengaluru..........................................(""यथ")/Respondent Appearances By: कोई नह"ं/None Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee. Sh. Biswanath Das, Cit, D/R, Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue. सुनवाई क" "त"थ/ Date Of The Hearing : August 22Nd, 2022 आदेश उ"ोषणा क" ितिथ/ Date Of Pronouncing The Order : September 8Th , 2022 Order This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Pertaining To The Assessment Year (In Short “Ay”) 2019-20 Is Directed Against The Order Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short The “Act”) By Ld. Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi [In Short Ld. “Cit(A)”] Dated

Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 250Section 80ASection 80P

80P of the Act was required to file the return before the due date as specified in sub-section (1) of section 139 of the Act. 10. Now, on perusal of the impugned order, I find that the assessee has stated to have faced genuine hardship, which prevented it to file the return of income before the due date. Relevant

DCIT, CIR-5(1), , KOLKATA vs. M/S COAL INDIA LTD., KOLKATA

ITA 1696/KOL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Jan 2026AY 2013-14
Section 115J

condone\nthe delay and admit the appeal for adjudication.\n1.3 Since the issues are common, all the eight appeals were heard\ntogether and are being decided vide this common order for the sake of\nconvenience and brevity.\n2.\nThe assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal in ITA No.\n466/KOL/2018:\n“1) That on the facts and circumstances

DCIT, CIRCLE - 5(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. COAL INDIA LIMITED , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 622/KOL/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Jan 2026AY 2011-12
Section 115J

condone\nthe delay and admit the appeal for adjudication.\n1.3 Since the issues are common, all the eight appeals were heard\ntogether and are being decided vide this common order for the sake of\nconvenience and brevity.\n2.\nThe assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal in ITA No.\n466/KOL/2018:\n“1) That on the facts and circumstances

DCIT, CIR-5(1), , KOLKATA vs. M/S COAL INDIA LTD., KOLKATA

ITA 1697/KOL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Jan 2026AY 2014-15
Section 115J

condone\nthe delay and admit the appeal for adjudication.\n1.3 Since the issues are common, all the eight appeals were heard\ntogether and are being decided vide this common order for the sake of\nconvenience and brevity.\n2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal in ITA No.\n466/KOL/2018:\n“1) That on the facts and circumstances

SATGRAMR. COLLIERY EMPLOYEES COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,ASANSOL vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, ASANSOL, ASANSOL

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1920/KOL/2025[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata25 Nov 2025AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishrai.T.A. No.1920/Kol/2025 Assessment Year: 2019-20 Satgram R Collery Employees Cooperative Credit Society Ltd……....Appellant Satgram Project, P.O Debichand Nagar, Block-Jamuria-1, Asansol, W.B. 713332. [Pan: Aajas8427K] Vs. Acit, Circle-1, Asansol……..……………....…..………………….…..... Respondent Appearances By: Shri Abhijit Banerjee, Advocate, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri S. B. Chakraborty, Addl. Cit, Sr. Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : November 24, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : November 25, 2025 आदेश / Order Per Sonjoy Sarma: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre (Hereinafter Referred To As “Ld. Cit(A)”) Dated 03.02.2025 Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As The “Act”). 2. At The Time Of Hearing Of The Matter, The Learned Representative Submitted That There Was A Delay Of 115 Days In Filing The Appeal. In This Connection, The Assessee Filed An Affidavit Explaining The Reasons For The Delay. After Considering The Submissions Of The Assessee & Examining The Contents Of The Affidavit, We Are Satisfied That The Reasons For The Delay Are Bona Fide & Deserve To Be Condoned.

Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 250Section 80P

B. Chakraborty, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR, appeared on behalf of the Respondent. Date of concluding the hearing : November 24, 2025 Date of pronouncing the order : November 25, 2025 आदेश / ORDER Per Sonjoy Sarma, Judicial Member: This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (hereinafter referred to as “ld. CIT(A)”) dated

M/S. COAL INDIA LIMITED ,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 5(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

ITA 1406/KOL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Jan 2026AY 2013-14
Section 115J

condone\nthe delay and admit the appeal for adjudication.\n1.3 Since the issues are common, all the eight appeals were heard\ntogether and are being decided vide this common order for the sake of\nconvenience and brevity.\n2.\nThe assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal in ITA No.\n466/KOL/2018:\n“1) That on the facts and circumstances

COAL INDIA LIMITED ,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 5(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

ITA 467/KOL/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Jan 2026AY 2012-13
Section 115J

condone\nthe delay and admit the appeal for adjudication.\n1.3 Since the issues are common, all the eight appeals were heard\ntogether and are being decided vide this common order for the sake of\nconvenience and brevity.\n2.\nThe assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal in ITA No.\n466/KOL/2018:\n“1) That on the facts and circumstances

THE W.B. STATE CO-OP AGRI AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LIMITED ,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CIR. 32, KOLKATA

ITA 1434/KOL/2023[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Aug 2024AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rakesh Mishraassessment Year: 2006-07

For Appellant: Shri Palash Chattapadhya, ARFor Respondent: Dr. Anup Biswas, Addl. CIT
Section 250Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

delayed by 295 days and a condonation petition has been filed. In the said application the assessee has submitted as under: 2 The W.B. State Co-operative Agriculture & Rural Development Bank Ltd., “In the Form No. 36 relating to the aforesaid Appeal filed by the WBSCARDB Ltd., date of order of the CIT was erroneously mentioned as January

COAL EMPLOYEES COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD 36(1), , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 302/KOL/2025[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata22 May 2025AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar&Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey]

Section 143(1)Section 250Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(f)

b) That the order was delivered in the emailed of the said Sri Amit Sarkar on or around 02.01.2024, but was located in the spam folder of his email in the last week of December, 2024 which was forwarded to us immediately. c) Thereafter, we contacted our regular counsel, Advocate Siddharth Agarwal of 1, Gibson Lane, Kolkata 700069 for filing

BURDWAN SATGACHIA JANAKALYAN SOCIETY,,MEMARI, BURDWAN vs. I.T.O., WARD - 1(1),, BURDWAN

ITA 1854/KOL/2025[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata18 Dec 2025AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shripradip Kumar Choubey, Jm Burdwan Satgachia Janakalyan Ito Ward 1(1) Society, Aaykar Bhawan, Court Satgachia, Memari, Burdwan, Compound, Burdwan, Vs. West Bengal-713422 West Bengal-713101 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaaab8302K Assessee By : Shri Soumitra Choudhury, Ar Revenue By : Shri Ruchika Sharma, Dr Date Of Hearing: 04.12.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 18.12.2025

For Appellant: Shri Soumitra Choudhury, ARFor Respondent: Shri Ruchika Sharma, DR
Section 131Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(b)Section 69ASection 80P

condone the delay and admit the appeal of adjudication. Burdwan Satgachia Janakalyan Society; A.Y. 2012-13 3. The facts in brief are that the assessee during the year did not file any return of income. The assessee is a co-operative society which was registered on 22.02.2008 and has been carrying on its activities since then said society have been

BISHARPARA KODALIA COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD. ,DUMDUM vs. ITO, WARD-49(2), KOLKATA. , KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1248/KOL/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata06 Feb 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2018-19 Bisharpara Kodalia Cooperative Income Tax Officer, Ward- Credit Society Ltd. 49(2), Kolkata Vs. Nabajiban, Bisharpara, Dum Dum, West Bengal-700158. (Pan: Aaaab9104B) (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Indranil Banerjee, FCAFor Respondent: Shri B. K. singh, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 10ASection 139Section 139(4)Section 143Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 154Section 80PSection 80P(2)(b)Section 80P(2)(d)

delay in filing of Return of Income by 25 days. The Return of Income had been processed by CPC u/s. 143(1) dated 31.05.2019 disallowing deduction U/S 80P since Return was not filed within the due date. 3.1. The assessee has filed Rectification of Mistake stating that assessee a Credit Co-operative Society dealing only with its members

SINGUR THANA L S P A CO-OPERATIVE MARKETING SOCIETY LRD. ,KOLKATA vs. ACIT,CIR-23(1), HOOGHLY. , HOOGHLY

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 910/KOL/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata18 Mar 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2016-17 Singur Thana Lspa Co-Operative Assistant Commissioner Of Marketing Society Ltd. Income Tax, Circle 23(1), C/O S. N. Ghosh & Associates, Hooghly. Vs. Advocates, 2, Garstin Place, 2Nd Floor, Suite No. 203, Off Hare Street, Kolkata-700 001. (Pan: Aabas0029B) (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Somnath Ghosh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Umakanta Dhrupati, Addl. CIT, DR
Section 143(3)Section 271BSection 273BSection 44ASection 80PSection 97(1)Section 97(1)(b)

condone the delay and adjudicate the matter on merits. 4. Brief facts of the case are that assessee is a Cooperative Society engaged in trading of fertilizer, supply of water for agriculture, providing loans and advances to its members and also runs a ration shop. Assessee is registered under the West Bengal Cooperative Societies Act, 2006. Assessee filed its return