BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

26 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 80G(5)(vi)clear

Sorted by relevance

Pune169Mumbai75Jaipur67Ahmedabad63Chennai58Delhi34Bangalore32Kolkata26Lucknow18Rajkot14Hyderabad12Nagpur12Surat9Panaji5Agra5Chandigarh5Raipur4Indore3Amritsar3Allahabad3Jodhpur2SC1Cuttack1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 12A62Section 80G42Section 80G(5)(iii)35Section 14A29Section 80G(5)28Section 80G(5)(vi)20Exemption15Addition to Income12Condonation of Delay

NITDAA FOUNDATION,KOLKATA vs. CIT(E), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 667/KOL/2024[00]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Aug 2024

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishranitdaa Foundation, Commissioner Of Income Fe 261, Sector-Iii, Salt Lake, Tax (Exemption), Kolkata, Vs West Bengal -700106 10B, Middleton Row, (Pan: Aadtn2308K) West Bengal - 700071 (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: S. Banerjee, A.RFor Respondent: Amitava Sen, Addl. CIT-DR
Section 12A(1)(ac)Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)Section 80G(5)(iv)

delay of 79 days may kindly be condoned by Your Honour and our Appeal be decided on merits in the interest of justice.” 7. The assessee was also required to inform whether any approval was granted under section 12AA or under section 80G of the Act earlier, in response to which, the Ld. AR filed a copy of the order

Showing 1–20 of 26 · Page 1 of 2

11
Section 80I10
Section 143(1)9
Deduction8

VKPM SEVA TRUST, KOLKATA vs. CIT(E), KOLAKTA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 238/KOL/2024[00]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 May 2024

Bench: Sri Rajesh Kumar & Pradip Kumar Choubey

Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)

condone the delay. 5. Upon hearing the rival submissions of the Counsels of the respective parties, we have perused the case of the assessee which is as follows: The brief fact of the case of the assessee is that the assessee is a charitable Trust registered/approved u/s 80G(5) of the Act since 2016. However, an amendment was brought into

PRAMEYA FOUNDATION,KAIKHALI BOINCHBERIA vs. CIT (EXEMPTION) , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 954/KOL/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Oct 2024

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishraprameya Foundation, Cit (Exemption), Kolkata, Vill- Boinchberia, Po- Kaikhali Income Tax Office, 10B, Falta Boinchberia, Falta South, Vs Middleton Road, 24 Parganas - 743503 Kolkata - 700071 (Pan: Aadtp0927G) (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: A. Kundu, CIT DR
Section 80Section 80GSection 80G(5)(iii)Section 80G(5)(iv)

condoning the delay, if such provision is provided in the Act while considering any issue for adjudication. Therefore, considering the above proposition, they have held that the ld. CIT (Exemption) had rightly rejected the application of the assessee for grant of approval under section 10(23C)(vi) of the Income-tax Act. The Ld. CIT(E) was of the view

BHABAR BHABANI MANDIR PUBLIC TRUST,WEST BENGAL BURDWAN vs. CIT EXEMPTION , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 576/KOL/2024[2023-2024]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata14 Oct 2024AY 2023-2024

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey & Shri Rakesh Mishrabhabar Bhabani Mandir Public Cit (Exemption), Kolkata, Trust, Income Tax Office, 10B, Kalna Saspur Kalna, Purba Vs Middleton Road, Bardhaman - 713409 Kolkata - 700071 (Pan: Aadtb5275B) (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Kishan Agarwal, ARFor Respondent: Abhijit Kundu, CIT DR
Section 12ASection 8Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)Section 80G(5)(iv)

condoning the delay, if such provision is provided in the Act while considering any issue for adjudication. Therefore, considering the above proposition, they have held that the ld. CIT (Exemption) had rightly rejected the application of the assessee for grant of approval under section 10(23C)(vi) of the Income-tax Act. The Ld. CIT(E) was of the view

AGARWAL SABHA ,ULUBARI, GUWAHATI vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 570/KOL/2024[2024-2025]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata14 Oct 2024AY 2024-2025

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey & Shri Rakesh Mishraagarwal Sabha, Cit (Exemption), Kolkata, H.No. 92A, Saratkunj 10B, Middleton Road, Apartment, Mill Road, Ulubari, Vs Kolkata - 700071 Guwahati (Pan: Aalaa5893M) (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Ashok Kumar Agarwala, ARFor Respondent: Abhijit Kundu, CIT DR
Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)Section 80G(5)(iv)

condoning the delay, if such provision is provided in the Act while considering any issue for adjudication. Therefore, considering the above proposition, they have held that the ld. CIT (Exemption) had rightly rejected the application of the assessee for grant of approval under section 10(23C)(vi) of the Income-tax Act. The Ld. CIT(E) was of the view

ANANDILALL PODDAR CHARITABLE TRUST,KOLKATA vs. CIT(EXEMPTION, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 372/KOL/2024[00]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 May 2024

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Rakesh Mishraassessment Year:

For Appellant: Shri Sonu Kumar Agarwal, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Bibekananda Madhu, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 12ASection 2Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)Section 80G(5)(iv)

condone the delay for application u/s. 10(23C), he held the application filed in Form No. 10AB u/s. 80G(5)(iii) of the Act as not maintainable as the Circular No. 6/2023 dated 24.05.2023 of the CBDT does not extend the due date to 30.09.2023 in such cases which was 30.09.2022 in such cases. The provisional certificate issued

LOKSAKHA WELFARE SOCIETY,KOLKATA vs. CIT(EXEMPTION),, KOLKATA

In the result, this appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1883/KOL/2025[----]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata30 Dec 2025

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)

condonation of delay has been filed by the assessee stating as under: “1. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Kolkata ('CIT(E)'), has passed the order dated 22 February 2025 under section 80G(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ('the Act') rejecting the registration under the said section to the Appellant. I.T.A. No.: 1883/KOL/2025 Assessment Year: N.A. Loksakha Welfare

SURAJ DEVI MOHTA CHARITABLE TRUST,KOLKATA vs. DIT-EXEMPTION, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee, is allowed

ITA 2023/KOL/2014[]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata25 Sept 2017

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.2023/Kol/2014 Suraj Devi Mohta Charitable Vs. D.I.T.(Exemption), Kolkata Trust 10B, Middleton Row, 6Th 7, Lyons Range, 2Nd Floor, Room Floor, Kolkata – 700 071. No.4C, Kolkata – 700 001. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaets3384 F (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellantby :Shri P. J. Bhide, Fca Respondent By :Shri G. Hangshing, Cit(Dr) सुनवाईकीतारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 06/09/2017 घोषणाकीतारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 25/09/2017 आदेश / O R D E R Per Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Am: The Captioned Appeal Filed By The Assessee, Is Directed Against An Order Passed By The Director Of Income Tax (Exemption), Kolkata Dated 06.08.2014. 2.This Appeal Is Time-Barred By 21 Days. The Assessee Moved An Application For Condonation Of Delay In Filing The Appeal. Having Heard The Petition Of Condonation Of Delay, We Find That There Was Sufficient Reason For Not Filing The Appeal Within The Time Limit, Before The Itat. Therefore, We Condone The Delay & Admit The Appeal For Hearing. 3. The Grounds Of Appeal Raised By The Assessee Are As Under: “1.That On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case, The Ld. Director Of Income Tax(Exemption), Kolkata Erred In Rejecting The Application For Renewal Of Exemption U/S 80G(5)(Vi) Of The I.T. Act, 1961 On The Ground That The Loan Given To Mrs. Shrutimohta, Wife Of One Of The Trustees, Shri

For Appellant: Shri P. J. Bhide, FCAFor Respondent: Shri G. Hangshing, CIT(DR)
Section 11Section 11(5)Section 13Section 13(2)(a)Section 80G(5)(vi)

condone the delay and admit the appeal for hearing. 3. The Grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are as under: “1.That on the facts and circumstances of the case, the ld. Director of Income Tax(Exemption), Kolkata erred in rejecting the Application for Renewal of Exemption u/s 80G(5)(vi) of the I.T. Act, 1961 on the ground that

SARADA MISSION SEVASRAM,PURBA MEDINIPUR vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), KOLKATA

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 994/KOL/2023[N.A]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 Jan 2024

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year:

For Appellant: Shri Miraj D. Shah, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S. Datta, CIT, DR
Section 12ASection 5Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)Section 80G(5)(iv)Section 80G(5)(vi)

vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) whereby the application of the assessee for registration u/s. 80G of the Act has been rejected. 2. The assessee in this appeal has taken the following grounds of appeal: “1) For that on the facts and circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT (Exemption) was grossly erred

CHANDERNAGORE BARASAT GATE CULTURAL ASSOCIATION,HOOGHLY vs. CIT-XX, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result the appeals are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1469/KOL/2014[]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata01 Mar 2018

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Am ]

For Appellant: Shri J.P.Khaitan, Sr.Advocate &For Respondent: Md. Usman , CIT(DR)
Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(vi)

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. 3. As far as the merits of the appeals are concerned, we shall first take up for consideration appeal against the order u/s 12AA(3) of the Act. The factual background ITA No.1468 & 1469/Kol/2014 Chandernagore Barasat Gate Cultural Association of this appeal is that the assessee is a Society registered w.e.f. 08.03.1995 under

CHANDERNAGORE BARASAT GATE CULTURAL ASSOCIATION,HOOGHLY vs. CIT-XX, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result the appeals are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1468/KOL/2014[]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata01 Mar 2018

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Am ]

For Appellant: Shri J.P.Khaitan, Sr.Advocate &For Respondent: Md. Usman , CIT(DR)
Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(vi)

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. 3. As far as the merits of the appeals are concerned, we shall first take up for consideration appeal against the order u/s 12AA(3) of the Act. The factual background ITA No.1468 & 1469/Kol/2014 Chandernagore Barasat Gate Cultural Association of this appeal is that the assessee is a Society registered w.e.f. 08.03.1995 under

MITRA INSTRITUTION BHOWANIPUR BRANCH,KOLKATA vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 742/KOL/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata27 Oct 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)(iii)

5)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) dated 27.08.2024. I.T.A. No.: 742/KOL/2025 Assessment Year: 2022-23 Mitra Institution Bhowanipur Branch 1.1. The Registry has informed that the appeal is delayed by 159 days. Along with the appeal memo, the assessee has filed an application seeking condonation of delay. The reasons mentioned are that

PCBL LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. A.C.I.T., CIRCLE - 11(1),, KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2034/KOL/2024[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Jun 2025AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey&Shri Sanjay Awasthi]

Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 14ASection 35Section 35(2)(ab)Section 37Section 80GSection 80ISection 92C

condoned. ITA No. 2457/Kol/2024 for AY 2018-19 3. Brief facts of the case of the assessee are that the assessee engaged in the manufacturing and sale of carbon black, sale of surplus of power generated from off- gases from carbon black manufacturing process having its factories at Durgapur, Kochi 3 I.T.A. Nos. 2456 to 2459/Kol/2024 Assessment Years

PRAMOD LAKRA,DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -11(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. PHILIPS CARBON BLACK LTD , KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2459/KOL/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Jun 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey&Shri Sanjay Awasthi]

Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 14ASection 35Section 35(2)(ab)Section 37Section 80GSection 80ISection 92C

condoned. ITA No. 2457/Kol/2024 for AY 2018-19 3. Brief facts of the case of the assessee are that the assessee engaged in the manufacturing and sale of carbon black, sale of surplus of power generated from off- gases from carbon black manufacturing process having its factories at Durgapur, Kochi 3 I.T.A. Nos. 2456 to 2459/Kol/2024 Assessment Years

PRAMOD LAKRA,DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 11(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. PHILLIPS CARBON BLACK LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2457/KOL/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Jun 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey&Shri Sanjay Awasthi]

Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 14ASection 35Section 35(2)(ab)Section 37Section 80GSection 80ISection 92C

condoned. ITA No. 2457/Kol/2024 for AY 2018-19 3. Brief facts of the case of the assessee are that the assessee engaged in the manufacturing and sale of carbon black, sale of surplus of power generated from off- gases from carbon black manufacturing process having its factories at Durgapur, Kochi 3 I.T.A. Nos. 2456 to 2459/Kol/2024 Assessment Years

PRAMOD LAKRA, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-11(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. PHILLIPS CARBON BLACK LTD, KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2458/KOL/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Jun 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey&Shri Sanjay Awasthi]

Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 14ASection 35Section 35(2)(ab)Section 37Section 80GSection 80ISection 92C

condoned. ITA No. 2457/Kol/2024 for AY 2018-19 3. Brief facts of the case of the assessee are that the assessee engaged in the manufacturing and sale of carbon black, sale of surplus of power generated from off- gases from carbon black manufacturing process having its factories at Durgapur, Kochi 3 I.T.A. Nos. 2456 to 2459/Kol/2024 Assessment Years

PRAMOD LAKRA, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 11(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. PHILLIPS CARBON BLACK LTD, KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2456/KOL/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Jun 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey&Shri Sanjay Awasthi]

Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 14ASection 35Section 35(2)(ab)Section 37Section 80GSection 80ISection 92C

condoned. ITA No. 2457/Kol/2024 for AY 2018-19 3. Brief facts of the case of the assessee are that the assessee engaged in the manufacturing and sale of carbon black, sale of surplus of power generated from off- gases from carbon black manufacturing process having its factories at Durgapur, Kochi 3 I.T.A. Nos. 2456 to 2459/Kol/2024 Assessment Years

D.C.I.T CIR - 3(1), KOLKATA vs. M/S THE PEERLESS GENERAL FINANCE & INVESTMENT CO LTD, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1470/KOL/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Dec 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Sri Aby T. Varkey) Ita No. 1469 & 1470/Kol/2019 Assessment Year: 2013-14 & 2015-16 Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-12(1), Kolkata……………….………....…........Appellant Vs. M/S. The Peerless General Finance & Investment & Co. Ltd..................……………….…..Respondent 3, Esplanade East Kolkata – 700 069 [Pan : Aabct 3043 L] Appearances By: Shri Supriyo Pal, Jcit Sr. D/R, Appearing On Behalf Of The Revenue Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Adv. & Subrata Dey, Ca, Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee. . Date Of Concluding The Hearing : October 31St, 2019 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : December 5Th, 2019 Order Per J. Sudhakar Reddy, Am :-

Section 14ASection 250

delay is condoned and the appeals are admitted. 2.1. We have heard rival contentions. On careful consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, perusal of the papers on record, orders of the authorities below as well as case law cited, we hold as follows:- 3. We first take the appeal of the revenue for the Assessment Year

DCIT, CIRCLE - 3(1), , KOLKATA vs. M/S. THE PEERLESS GENERAL FINANCE & INVESTMENT CO. LTD.,, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1469/KOL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Dec 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Sri Aby T. Varkey) Ita No. 1469 & 1470/Kol/2019 Assessment Year: 2013-14 & 2015-16 Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-12(1), Kolkata……………….………....…........Appellant Vs. M/S. The Peerless General Finance & Investment & Co. Ltd..................……………….…..Respondent 3, Esplanade East Kolkata – 700 069 [Pan : Aabct 3043 L] Appearances By: Shri Supriyo Pal, Jcit Sr. D/R, Appearing On Behalf Of The Revenue Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Adv. & Subrata Dey, Ca, Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee. . Date Of Concluding The Hearing : October 31St, 2019 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : December 5Th, 2019 Order Per J. Sudhakar Reddy, Am :-

Section 14ASection 250

delay is condoned and the appeals are admitted. 2.1. We have heard rival contentions. On careful consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, perusal of the papers on record, orders of the authorities below as well as case law cited, we hold as follows:- 3. We first take the appeal of the revenue for the Assessment Year

NITDAA FOUDATION ,KOLKATA vs. CIT(E), KOLKATA

In the result, ITA No. 1431/KOL/2023 is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1431/KOL/2023[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 Feb 2024AY 2023-24

Bench: Sri Anikesh Banerjee & Sri Girish Agrawal

Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G(5)(vi)

80G(5)(vi) on 7.11.2019. 2. That the Learned C.I.T (Exemption) Kolkata completely lost sight that most of the documents as demanded by the Questionnaire/ notice are already filed along with the application for registration u/s 12AA filed in Form No. 10A on 24.9.2019 which was granted u/s 12AA on 7.11.2019 3. That the Learned C.I.T.(Exemption) Kolkata