D.C.I.T CIR - 10(1), KOLKATA vs. M/S EUREKA FORBS LTD, KOLKATA

condone the delay and admit the appeals for\nadjudication.\n2. The Revenue is in appeal before the Tribunal raising the following\ngrounds of appeal:\nI. ITA No. 1246/KOL/2019; AY 2012-13:\n“1. That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A)\nhas erred in deleting the sum of Rs.77,70,880/- incurred

D.C.I.T CIR - 10(1), KOLKATA vs. M/S EUREKA FORBS LTD, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA No

condone the delay and admit the appeals for\nadjudication.\n2. The Revenue is in appeal before the Tribunal raising the following\ngrounds of appeal:\nI. ITA No. 1246/KOL/2019; AY 2012-13:\n“1. That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A)\nhas erred in deleting the sum of Rs.77,70,880/- incurred

D.C.I.T CIR - 10(1), KOLKATA vs. M/S EUREKA FORBS LTD, KOLKATA

section 40A(2)(a)\nof the Act states that no disallowance on account of any expenditure being\nexcessive shall be made in respect of specified domestic transaction referred to\nin section 92A of the Act, if such transaction is at arm's length price as defined\nin clause (li) of Section 92F of the Act. Furthermore, such disallowance

DCIT, CC-XXVII, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S BUDGE BUDGE REFINERIES LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, Appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am]

condone the delay and admit the appeals for adjudication. 3. These three appeals pertain to same assessee, different assessment years, common issues involved, therefore, therefore, all the appeals have been clubbed and heard together and a consolidated order is being passed for the sake of convenience and brevity. The Revenue appeal in ITA No. 388/Kol/2014, pertaining

DCIT, CC-XXVII, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S BUDGE BUDGE REFINERIES LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, Appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am]

condone the delay and admit the appeals for adjudication. 3. These three appeals pertain to same assessee, different assessment years, common issues involved, therefore, therefore, all the appeals have been clubbed and heard together and a consolidated order is being passed for the sake of convenience and brevity. The Revenue appeal in ITA No. 388/Kol/2014, pertaining

DCIT, CC-XXVII, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S BUDGE BUDGE REFINERIES LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, Appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am]

condone the delay and admit the appeals for adjudication. 3. These three appeals pertain to same assessee, different assessment years, common issues involved, therefore, therefore, all the appeals have been clubbed and heard together and a consolidated order is being passed for the sake of convenience and brevity. The Revenue appeal in ITA No. 388/Kol/2014, pertaining

M/S MBL INFRASTRUCTURES LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

Appeal is allowed

Bench: Shri P. M. Jagtap, V.P & Shri S. S. Godara, Jm आयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A No.427/Kol/2018 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2012-13) M/S. Mbl Infrastructure Ltd. Vs Dcit, Central Circle-2(2), Kolkata . 1St Floor, Divine Bliss, 2/3, Judges Court Road, Kolkata – 700027. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaccm0564C (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri S. K. Tulsiyan, Advocate Respondent By : Shri Ram Bilash Meena, Cit(Dr) सुनवाईक"तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 06/10/2020 घोषणाक"तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 22/10/2020

condone the delay herein of 291 days. The case is now taken up for adjudication on merits. 3. We advert to the basic relevant facts. This assessee is a company engaged in road infrastructure development and maintenance business. It files its original return on 29.09.12 declaring total income of Rs.85,69,37,910/-. The Assessing Officer thereafter completed the regular

WEST BENGAL STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE -2, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, ITA No. 1761& 1762/Kol/2011 are allowed and ITA No

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Shri M. Balaganesh, Am]

condone the delay and admit the appeals. 2 ITA No.1761-1763/Kol/2011 WB State Warehousing Corporation AY 2003-04, 2005-06 & 2007-08 3. The only issue in ITA No.1761/Kol/2011 for AY 2003-04 of assessee’s appeal is as regards to the order of CIT(A) confirming the action of AO in disallowing provision for gratuity amounting to Rs.42

ACIT, CIRCLE-5(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S THIESS MINES INDIA PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, this issue is adjudicated in favour of the assessee

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Sri Aby T. Varkey)

delay is condoned and appeal admitted. 3. The assessee is a company with an object of carrying on business of providing mining services for prospecting, exploring, operating and working on mines and quarries. The common issue that arises in both the revenue appeals is whether the assessee has set up its business or not. The Assessing Officer

ACIT, CIRCLE - 5(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. THIESS MINES INDIA PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, this issue is adjudicated in favour of the assessee

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Sri Aby T. Varkey)

delay is condoned and appeal admitted. 3. The assessee is a company with an object of carrying on business of providing mining services for prospecting, exploring, operating and working on mines and quarries. The common issue that arises in both the revenue appeals is whether the assessee has set up its business or not. The Assessing Officer