BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

44 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 254(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai190Surat139Delhi91Chennai64Ahmedabad64Jaipur60Kolkata44Rajkot33Raipur32Pune28Indore25Bangalore25Hyderabad21Visakhapatnam21Lucknow20Chandigarh18Cochin12Nagpur11Guwahati9Cuttack8Allahabad5SC5Varanasi5Agra3Patna3Panaji2Dehradun2Amritsar2Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)38Limitation/Time-bar29Condonation of Delay27Addition to Income26Section 26324Section 6822Section 115J20Section 36(1)(va)18Section 14A

INCOME TAX OFFICER, ESPLANADE AAYAKAR BHAVAN vs. ALERT CONSULTANTS AND CREDIT PVT LTD, R N MUKHERJEE ROAD

In the result, the appeal of the revenue stands dismissed

ITA 1085/KOL/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata25 Nov 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 250

condonation of delay. The Income Tax Officer, being a Government Officer, should have avoided to give a incorrect affidavit before this Tribunal. 6. The appeal of the revenue is liable to be dismissed on this score alone. However, we are also surprised as to why the revenue is aggrieved by the impugned order of the Ld. CIT(A). The concluding

BABA IRON INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. ,KOLKATA vs. ITO,WARD-9(1), KOLKATA., KOLKATA

ITA 925/KOL/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata19 Feb 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)

Showing 1–20 of 44 · Page 1 of 3

16
Section 25012
Section 14412
Disallowance10
Section 144
Section 144B
Section 249
Section 253
Section 254
Section 263
Section 3
Section 5

254 read with Section 144B of the Act. 6. Dissatisfied with this order, assessee carried the matter in appeal before ld. CIT(A) and ld. CIT(A) has dismissed the appeal vide order dated 07.02.2023. 7. Dissatisfied with both these orders, assessee came up before the Tribunal. The Registry has pointed out that appeal of the assessee is time barred

AMRITLAXMI COMMERCIAL PVT. LTD. ,KOLKATA vs. ITO,WARD-7(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 698/KOL/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Oct 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice- & Shri Rajesh Kumar

Section 131Section 142(1)Section 254Section 271(1)(b)Section 274

condonation of delay is being made, is under the signature of ld. Counsel for the 3 Assessment Year : 2012-2013 Amritlaxmi Commercial Pvt. Limited assessee and not under the signature of any authorized person, who can sign the return. The signatures on the appeal are of one Asha Mishra, but the Power of Attorney issued in favour

GIRIK ESTATE PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD 6(2), , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 170/KOL/2022[2008-09]Status: HeardITAT Kolkata16 Jun 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoysarma]

Section 249Section 253Section 3Section 5

condone the delay and proceed to decide the appeal on merit. 9. Vide issue raised in ground no. 2, the assessee has assailed the order of Ld. CIT(A) upholding the assessment framed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act of the Act which is invalid, ab-initio void, ultra vires and ex-facie nullity in the eyes

DCIT, CIRCLE - 8, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. SAHARA INDIA MUTUAL BENEFIT CO. LTD., KOLKATA

Appeals are dismissed in above terms

ITA 1511/KOL/2008[2000-01]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 Jan 2025AY 2000-01

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra

Section 143(3)Section 144

254 of the Act. 3-4 41/Lkw/20 DCIT, Central M/s. Sahara India CIT(A)-III, Lucknow’s 29.03.2001 02 with C.O. Circler-I, Commercial order dated framed by No.24/Lkw/ Lucknow Corporation Ltd. 30.10.2001 passed in DCIT, Central 2005 for AY: case no. 85/44/CC- Circle-I, 1994-95 I/LKO/2001-02 Lucknow involving proceedings under Section 144/251 of the Act. 5-6 705/Lkw/2

DCIT, CIRCLE - 8, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. SAHARA INDIA MUTUAL BENEFIT CO. LTD., KOLKATA

Appeals are dismissed in above terms

ITA 1306/KOL/2007[1999-2000]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 Jan 2025AY 1999-2000

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra

Section 143(3)Section 144

254 of the Act. 3-4 41/Lkw/20 DCIT, Central M/s. Sahara India CIT(A)-III, Lucknow’s 29.03.2001 02 with C.O. Circler-I, Commercial order dated framed by No.24/Lkw/ Lucknow Corporation Ltd. 30.10.2001 passed in DCIT, Central 2005 for AY: case no. 85/44/CC- Circle-I, 1994-95 I/LKO/2001-02 Lucknow involving proceedings under Section 144/251 of the Act. 5-6 705/Lkw/2

RAMAKRISHNA RAO,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD-2(3), ALIPURDUAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 541/KOL/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata12 Jun 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rakesh Mishraassessment Year: 2020-21

For Appellant: Shri Siddarth Agarwal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sailen Samadder, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR
Section 143(1)Section 250Section 90

3 Ramakrishna Rao Chintalapudi, AY: 2020-21. 7. That then Sri Siddharth Agarwal, Advocate prepared the appeal papers and finally the same was filed on 15.03.2024 before the Hon'ble Tribunal with a delay of 85 days. 8. That your petitioner prays that in the facts and circumstances stated above, the delay of 85 days in filing appeal before

SWABHUMI FOUNDATION ,NORTH TWENTY FOUR PARGANAS vs. DCIT, CIRCLE 1(1), EXEMPTION, , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical\npurposes

ITA 771/KOL/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 Jun 2025AY 2018-19
Section 11Section 13(3)Section 143(3)Section 250

254 days.", "held": "The Tribunal condoned the delay, noting the reason provided by the assessee for the non-receipt of notices and the consequent delay was genuine. The Tribunal decided to remand the matter to the CIT(A) for de novo adjudication to provide a proper opportunity of hearing to the assessee.", "result": "Allowed", "sections": [ "250", "13(3

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. SURESH KUMAR BANTHIA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed and the Cross\nObjection of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1894/KOL/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Jan 2026AY 2016-17
Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148

condone\nthe delay and admit the appeal for hearing.\n3.\nThe issue raised by the Revenue in ground no.1 is against the order\nof Id. CIT (A) annulling the assessment framed u/s 147 of the\nIncome-tax Act, 1961 (the Act) by the Id. AO on the ground of being\ninvalid and void ab initio without considering the facts

DCIT, CIRCLE - 5(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. COAL INDIA LIMITED , KOLKATA

ITA 623/KOL/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Jan 2026AY 2012-13
Section 115JSection 250

condone the delay and admit the appeal for adjudication. 1.3 Since the issues are common, all the eight appeals were heard together and are being decided vide this common order for the sake of convenience and brevity. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal in ITA No. 466/KOL/2018: “1) That on the facts and circumstances

SMITA BISWAS,JALPAIGURI vs. A.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1(1), JALPAIGURI, JALPAIGURI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 464/KOL/2022[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Jan 2024AY 2016-2017

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar]

Section 127(1)Section 143(2)

condone the delay. 5. The assessee has raised legal issue before us that the assessment was framed by ACIT, Circle-1(1), Jalpaiguri instead of jurisdiction with ITO, Ward-1(4), Jalpaiguri who issued the notice u/s 143(2) of the Act and has the pecuniary jurisdiction in terms of Instruction No. 1/2011{F.No.187/12/2010-IT(A-I)}. 6. Facts

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-9(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. LITTLESTAR SECURITIES PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 694/KOL/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata06 Mar 2026AY 2012-13
Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 254Section 68

condone the delay and admit the appeal for adjudication.\n3.\nThe only issue raised by the Revenue in the various grounds of\nappeal is against the order of Id. CIT (A) deleting the addition of\n*27,63,00,000/- as made by the Id. AO u/s 68 of the Income-tax\nAct, 1961 (the Act) by treating the share

DCIT, CIR-5(1), , KOLKATA vs. M/S COAL INDIA LTD., KOLKATA

ITA 1697/KOL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Jan 2026AY 2014-15
Section 115J

condone\nthe delay and admit the appeal for adjudication.\n1.3 Since the issues are common, all the eight appeals were heard\ntogether and are being decided vide this common order for the sake of\nconvenience and brevity.\n2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal in ITA No.\n466/KOL/2018:\n“1) That on the facts and circumstances

M/S. COAL INDIA LIMITED ,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 5(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

ITA 1406/KOL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Jan 2026AY 2013-14
Section 115J

condone\nthe delay and admit the appeal for adjudication.\n1.3 Since the issues are common, all the eight appeals were heard\ntogether and are being decided vide this common order for the sake of\nconvenience and brevity.\n2.\nThe assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal in ITA No.\n466/KOL/2018:\n“1) That on the facts and circumstances

COAL INDIA LIMITED ,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 5(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

ITA 467/KOL/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Jan 2026AY 2012-13
Section 115J

condone\nthe delay and admit the appeal for adjudication.\n1.3 Since the issues are common, all the eight appeals were heard\ntogether and are being decided vide this common order for the sake of\nconvenience and brevity.\n2.\nThe assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal in ITA No.\n466/KOL/2018:\n“1) That on the facts and circumstances

DCIT, CIR-5(1), , KOLKATA vs. M/S COAL INDIA LTD., KOLKATA

ITA 1696/KOL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Jan 2026AY 2013-14
Section 115J

condone\nthe delay and admit the appeal for adjudication.\n1.3 Since the issues are common, all the eight appeals were heard\ntogether and are being decided vide this common order for the sake of\nconvenience and brevity.\n2.\nThe assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal in ITA No.\n466/KOL/2018:\n“1) That on the facts and circumstances

DCIT, CIRCLE - 5(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. COAL INDIA LIMITED , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 622/KOL/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Jan 2026AY 2011-12
Section 115J

condone\nthe delay and admit the appeal for adjudication.\n1.3 Since the issues are common, all the eight appeals were heard\ntogether and are being decided vide this common order for the sake of\nconvenience and brevity.\n2.\nThe assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal in ITA No.\n466/KOL/2018:\n“1) That on the facts and circumstances

BANGIYA GRAMIN VIKASH BANK (PRESENTLY KNOWN AS WEST BENGAL GRAMIN BANK),MURSHIDABAD vs. ITO, WARD 42(1),, MURSHIDABAD

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 2592/KOL/2025[2022-2023]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 Feb 2026AY 2022-2023
Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 36(1)(va)

section 254 of the Act on 10.03.2022, asking the assessee as to why the penalty should not be imposed. Finally, the penalty was imposed of ₹3,61,000/- depending on the period of delay which was calculated by the Id. AO at page no.3 of the assessment order.\n10.\nIn the appellate proceedings, the Id. CIT (A) confirmed the same

BANGIYA GRAMIN VIKASH BANK (PRESENTLY KNOWN AS WEST BENGAL GRAMIN BANK),MURSHIDABAD vs. JCIT(I & CI) - 1, , KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 2591/KOL/2025[2021-2022]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 Feb 2026AY 2021-2022
Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 36(1)(va)

condone the delay and adjudicate the appeal in the ensuing paras.\nThe only issue raised by the assessee in the various grounds of appeal\nis against the order of Id. CIT (A) not allowing the employees provident\nfund payment made u/s 36(1)(va) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the\nAct) within a grace period of 5 days

D.C.I.T CIR - 10(1), KOLKATA vs. M/S EUREKA FORBS LTD, KOLKATA

ITA 1248/KOL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata12 Jan 2026AY 2014-15
Section 115JSection 14ASection 250Section 92C

condone the delay and admit the appeals for\nadjudication.\n2. The Revenue is in appeal before the Tribunal raising the following\ngrounds of appeal:\nI. ITA No. 1246/KOL/2019; AY 2012-13:\n\"1. That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A)\nhas erred in deleting the sum of Rs.77,70,880/- incurred