BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

58 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 248clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai162Karnataka102Delhi78Mumbai71Kolkata58Jaipur38Calcutta36Bangalore34Hyderabad32Ahmedabad32Cochin31Chandigarh29Pune29Nagpur16Lucknow16Panaji15Cuttack12Raipur11Ranchi9Indore9Guwahati6Patna5Visakhapatnam4Amritsar4Dehradun3Agra2Rajkot2Surat2Allahabad1Andhra Pradesh1Telangana1Rajasthan1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 250356Section 26324Section 143(3)18Section 271(1)(c)17Section 11(1)11Addition to Income11Section 14A9Condonation of Delay9Disallowance

DCIT, CC-4(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. NALINI BHASKARAN , KOLKATA

In the result the appeal is partly allowed”

ITA 564/KOL/2023[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Jun 2024AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 250

248 days and in order to explain the delay, the Revenue has filed an application for condonation of delay. With the assistance of the ld. Representatives, we have gone through the record carefully. Sub-section

DCIT, CC-4(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. NALINI BHASKARAN , KOLKATA

In the result the appeal is partly allowed”

ITA 575/KOL/2023[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Jun 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 250

Showing 1–20 of 58 · Page 1 of 3

8
Section 143(1)7
Section 2746
Exemption6

248 days and in order to explain the delay, the Revenue has filed an application for condonation of delay. With the assistance of the ld. Representatives, we have gone through the record carefully. Sub-section

DCIT, CC-4(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. NALINI BHASKARAN , KOLKATA

In the result the appeal is partly allowed”

ITA 563/KOL/2023[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Jun 2024AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 250

248 days and in order to explain the delay, the Revenue has filed an application for condonation of delay. With the assistance of the ld. Representatives, we have gone through the record carefully. Sub-section

DCIT, CC-4(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. NALINI BHASKARAN , KOLKATA

In the result the appeal is partly allowed”

ITA 568/KOL/2023[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Jun 2024AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 250

248 days and in order to explain the delay, the Revenue has filed an application for condonation of delay. With the assistance of the ld. Representatives, we have gone through the record carefully. Sub-section

DCIT, CC-4(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. NALINI BHASKARAN , KOLKATA

In the result the appeal is partly allowed”

ITA 577/KOL/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Jun 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 250

248 days and in order to explain the delay, the Revenue has filed an application for condonation of delay. With the assistance of the ld. Representatives, we have gone through the record carefully. Sub-section

DCIT, CC-4(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. NALINI BHASKARAN , KOLKATA

In the result the appeal is partly allowed”

ITA 565/KOL/2023[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Jun 2024AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 250

248 days and in order to explain the delay, the Revenue has filed an application for condonation of delay. With the assistance of the ld. Representatives, we have gone through the record carefully. Sub-section

DCIT, CC-4(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. NALINI BHASKARAN , KOLKATA

In the result the appeal is partly allowed”

ITA 569/KOL/2023[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Jun 2024AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 250

248 days and in order to explain the delay, the Revenue has filed an application for condonation of delay. With the assistance of the ld. Representatives, we have gone through the record carefully. Sub-section

DCIT, CC-4(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. NALINI BHASKARAN , KOLKATA

In the result the appeal is partly allowed”

ITA 573/KOL/2023[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Jun 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 250

248 days and in order to explain the delay, the Revenue has filed an application for condonation of delay. With the assistance of the ld. Representatives, we have gone through the record carefully. Sub-section

DCIT, CC-4(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. NALINI BHASKARAN , KOLKATA

In the result the appeal is partly allowed”

ITA 567/KOL/2023[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Jun 2024AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 250

248 days and in order to explain the delay, the Revenue has filed an application for condonation of delay. With the assistance of the ld. Representatives, we have gone through the record carefully. Sub-section

DCIT, CC-4(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. NALINI BHASKARAN , KOLKATA

In the result the appeal is partly allowed”

ITA 562/KOL/2023[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Jun 2024AY 2002-03

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 250

248 days and in order to explain the delay, the Revenue has filed an application for condonation of delay. With the assistance of the ld. Representatives, we have gone through the record carefully. Sub-section

DCIT,CC-4(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. THARUR BHASKARAN, KOLKATA

In the result the appeal is partly allowed”

ITA 586/KOL/2023[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Jun 2024AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 250

248 days and in order to explain the delay, the Revenue has filed an application for condonation of delay. With the assistance of the ld. Representatives, we have gone through the record carefully. Sub-section

DCIT,CC-4(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. THARUR BHASKARAN, KOLKATA

In the result the appeal is partly allowed”

ITA 582/KOL/2023[2001-02]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Jun 2024AY 2001-02

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 250

248 days and in order to explain the delay, the Revenue has filed an application for condonation of delay. With the assistance of the ld. Representatives, we have gone through the record carefully. Sub-section

DCIT,CC-4(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. THARUR BHASKARAN, KOLKATA

In the result the appeal is partly allowed”

ITA 587/KOL/2023[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Jun 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 250

248 days and in order to explain the delay, the Revenue has filed an application for condonation of delay. With the assistance of the ld. Representatives, we have gone through the record carefully. Sub-section

DCIT,CC-4(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. THARUR BHASKARAN, KOLKATA

In the result the appeal is partly allowed”

ITA 583/KOL/2023[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Jun 2024AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 250

248 days and in order to explain the delay, the Revenue has filed an application for condonation of delay. With the assistance of the ld. Representatives, we have gone through the record carefully. Sub-section

DCIT,CC-4(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. THARUR BHASKARAN, KOLKATA

In the result the appeal is partly allowed”

ITA 588/KOL/2023[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Jun 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 250

248 days and in order to explain the delay, the Revenue has filed an application for condonation of delay. With the assistance of the ld. Representatives, we have gone through the record carefully. Sub-section

DCIT,CC-4(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. THARUR BHASKARAN, KOLKATA

In the result the appeal is partly allowed”

ITA 584/KOL/2023[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Jun 2024AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 250

248 days and in order to explain the delay, the Revenue has filed an application for condonation of delay. With the assistance of the ld. Representatives, we have gone through the record carefully. Sub-section

DCIT,CC-4(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. THARUR BHASKARAN, KOLKATA

In the result the appeal is partly allowed”

ITA 585/KOL/2023[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Jun 2024AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 250

248 days and in order to explain the delay, the Revenue has filed an application for condonation of delay. With the assistance of the ld. Representatives, we have gone through the record carefully. Sub-section

DCIT, CC-4(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. NALINI BHASKARAN , KOLKATA

In the result the appeal is partly allowed”

ITA 574/KOL/2023[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Jun 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 250

248 days and in order to explain the delay, the Revenue has filed an application for condonation of delay. With the assistance of the ld. Representatives, we have gone through the record carefully. Sub-section

DCIT, CC-4(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. NALINI BHASKARAN , KOLKATA

In the result the appeal is partly allowed”

ITA 572/KOL/2023[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Jun 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 250

248 days and in order to explain the delay, the Revenue has filed an application for condonation of delay. With the assistance of the ld. Representatives, we have gone through the record carefully. Sub-section

DCIT, CC-4(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. NALINI BHASKARAN , KOLKATA

In the result the appeal is partly allowed”

ITA 576/KOL/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Jun 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 250

248 days and in order to explain the delay, the Revenue has filed an application for condonation of delay. With the assistance of the ld. Representatives, we have gone through the record carefully. Sub-section