BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 245Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai17Mumbai15Delhi12Cochin6Hyderabad5Kolkata4Guwahati3Varanasi2Jaipur1Amritsar1Ahmedabad1Karnataka1Orissa1SC1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)8Section 2636Section 1534Section 244A4Section 245D4Section 245F(1)4Addition to Income4Section 2(22)(e)3Section 144C

DCIT, CIRCLE - 3(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. THE PEERLESS GENERAL FINANCE & INVESTMENT CO. LTD.,, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 901/KOL/2018[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Feb 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Sri S.S. Viswanethra Ravii.T.A. No. 901/Kol/2018 Assessment Year: 2006-07 Dcit, Circle-3(1), Kolkata.................…………………….………....………………...…………………….….Appellant M/S The Peerless General Finance & Inv. Co. Ltd.....................................…....….…………..…...Respondent [Pan :Aabct 3043 L ] Appearances By: Shri S. Halder, Sr. Dr, Appearing On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri S. K. Tulsiyan, Appearing On Behalf Of The Respondent.

Section 154Section 244ASection 245DSection 245D(4)Section 245F(1)Section 245ISection 250

condone the delay and admit the appeal. 3. The sole ground of appeal that arises for our adjudication reads as follows: “01. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) is justified in allowing interest u/s 244A ignoring the order passed by the Hon’ble Settlement Commission and ignoring

2
Limitation/Time-bar2
Condonation of Delay2

M/S PCM STRESCON OVERSEAS VENTURE LTD.,SILIGURI vs. PCIT-1, , KOLKATA

In the result, both appeal preferred by the revenue (ITA No

ITA 112/KOL/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata25 Aug 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri P. M. Jagtap & Shri A. T. Varkey]

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 153Section 263

condone the delay and admit the appeal for hearing. ITA No.2652/Kol/2019 & CO No. 15/Kol/2020 PCM Strescon Overseas Ventures Ltd., AY 2012-13 2. At the outset, the Ld. A.R. for the assessee Shri Akkal Dudhwewala submitted that ITA No. 2652/Kol/2019 is preferred by the Revenue against the order of the Ld. CIT(A) for AY 2012-13 dated 24.07.2019, wherein

I.T.O.,WARD-1(1), KOLKATA vs. M/S PCM STRESCON OVERSEAS VENTURE LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, both appeal preferred by the revenue (ITA No

ITA 2652/KOL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata25 Aug 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri P. M. Jagtap & Shri A. T. Varkey]

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 153Section 263

condone the delay and admit the appeal for hearing. ITA No.2652/Kol/2019 & CO No. 15/Kol/2020 PCM Strescon Overseas Ventures Ltd., AY 2012-13 2. At the outset, the Ld. A.R. for the assessee Shri Akkal Dudhwewala submitted that ITA No. 2652/Kol/2019 is preferred by the Revenue against the order of the Ld. CIT(A) for AY 2012-13 dated 24.07.2019, wherein

D.C.I.T., CC - 2(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. EKO DIAGNOSTIC PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 159/KOL/2023[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata17 Jan 2024AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg, Hon’Ble & Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Shri A.K. Tulsyan, A/RFor Respondent: Smt. Madhumita Das, Addl. CIT, D/R
Section 143(2)Section 2(22)(e)Section 250Section 37(1)

condone the delay and proceed to admit the appeal for hearing. I.T.A. No. 159/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2013-14 Eko Diagnostic Pvt. Ltd. 3 4. Facts in brief are that the assessee is a private limited company running a diagnostic centre. Income of Rs.2,55,37,237/- declared in e- return for Assessment Year 2013-14 filed on 29/09/2013. Case selected