BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

11 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 234Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Patna466Chennai392Pune371Delhi224Bangalore212Cochin88Mumbai84Nagpur72Visakhapatnam59Hyderabad36Jaipur24Karnataka21Dehradun19Kolkata11Panaji10Indore8Agra8Lucknow8Rajkot8Raipur6Amritsar6Surat5Chandigarh4Guwahati2Ahmedabad2Jabalpur1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 234E32TDS11Condonation of Delay9Section 200A8Section 2017Section 56Section 2o6Limitation/Time-bar5Section 2533Section 3

THE PRINCIPAL, SALDIHA COLLEGE,BANKURA vs. ITO, WARD - 4(4), TDS, BANKURA & PURULIA

Appeal is allowed

ITA 2455/KOL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 Dec 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A No.2455/Kol/2018 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2014-15) The Principal, Saldiha College Vs. Ito, Ward – 4(4), Tds Bankura & Purulia Saldiha, Bankura – 722 173. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaajs 5748 K (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri S.M. Surana, Advocate Respondent By : Shri Dhrubajyoti Roy, Jcit, Sr. Dr सुनवाईक"तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 23/12/2019 घोषणाक"तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 31/12/2019 आदेश / O R D E R Per Shri S. S. Godara, Jm This Assessee’S Appeal For Assessment Year 2014-15 Arises Against The Commissioner Of Income Tax (A), Durgapur Dated 30.07.2018 Passed In Case No.161/Cit(A)/Dgp/2017-18 Involving Proceedings U/S 200A Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short ‘The Act’). Heard Both The Parties. Case File Perused.

For Appellant: Shri S.M. Surana, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Dhrubajyoti Roy, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 200ASection 234Section 234ESection 272ASection 2jSection 2o
3
Section 2493
Deduction3
Section 44E

condone the impugned delay of 27 days in filing of the instant appeal in the interest of substantive justice. The case is now taken for adjudication on merits. 3. It transpires during the course of hearing that the sole substantive issue raised in the instant case is that of correctness of both the lower authorities’ action levying 234E late

OCEAN MARINE ENVIRONMENT COATINGS PVT. LTD., ,KOLKATA vs. ITO, TDS, WARD - 2(2), KOLKATA

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 295/KOL/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 May 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Anil Kochar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vijay Kumar, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR
Section 200A(1)Section 234ESection 249(2)

234E. As such there is delay in submission of the appeal which may kindly be condoned in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case.” 4. In this respect, Ld. CIT(A) observed that assessee has electronically filed the TDS statement. In the present digital and electronic regime of tax administration, filing as well as processing and the communication thereof

OCEAN MARINE ENVIRONMENT COATINGS PVT. LTD., ,KOLKATA vs. ITO, TDS, WARD - 2(2), KOLKATA

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 296/KOL/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 May 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Anil Kochar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vijay Kumar, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR
Section 200A(1)Section 234ESection 249(2)

234E. As such there is delay in submission of the appeal which may kindly be condoned in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case.” 4. In this respect, Ld. CIT(A) observed that assessee has electronically filed the TDS statement. In the present digital and electronic regime of tax administration, filing as well as processing and the communication thereof

NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 253/KOL/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Nov 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Boradi.T.A No.253/Kol/2022 Assessment Year: 2019-20 National Insurance Co. Ltd...................................................................……Appellant 3, Middleton Street, Kolkata- 700071. [Pan: Aaacn9967E] Vs. Acit, Cpc-Tds,Ghaziabad, Up...…...................……........……...…..…..Respondent Appearances By: Shri Sanjoy Bhattacharya, Ar, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Vijay Kumar, Addl. Cit-Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : September 29, 2022 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : November 16, 2022 आदेश / Order संजय गग", "या"यक सद"य "वारा / Per Sanjay Garg: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 25.03.2022 Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Cit(A)’) Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’). The Assessee In This Appeal Has Taken The Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1. That The Ld. Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi Was Wrong In Dismissing The Appeal Filed By The Appellant Against The Intimation Dated 02/06/2019 Issued U/S 200A For The Financial Year 2018-19 (Relevant For The Assessment Year 2019- 20). 2. That Without Prejudice To The Contention Raised In Ground No. 1 Above, The Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals), Nfac, Was Wrong In Stating In The Appellate Order That The Appeal Of The Appellant Had Allegedly Related

Section 195Section 200ASection 201Section 234ESection 250

234E as constitutional valid and accordingly writ petition were dismissed. 5.3 In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case and the law and further relying upon above judgments, I agree with the action of the A.O. The grounds of appeal are, therefore, dismissed.” 5. A perusal of the above order of the ld. CIT(A) reveals that

COMANTRA E-SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. A.C.I.T.(CPC), TDS, BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 772/KOL/2022[2015-2016]Status: HeardITAT Kolkata21 Apr 2023AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 234ESection 249Section 253Section 3Section 5

Section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1963. Whenever interpretation and consideration of this expression has fallen for consideration before the Hon'ble High Courts as well as before the Hon'ble Supreme Court then, the Hon'ble Courts were unanimous in their conclusion that this expression has to be construed liberally. We may make reference to the following observations

COMANTRA E-SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. A.C.I.T.(CPC), TDS, BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 770/KOL/2022[2013-2014]Status: HeardITAT Kolkata21 Apr 2023AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 234ESection 249Section 253Section 3Section 5

Section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1963. Whenever interpretation and consideration of this expression has fallen for consideration before the Hon'ble High Courts as well as before the Hon'ble Supreme Court then, the Hon'ble Courts were unanimous in their conclusion that this expression has to be construed liberally. We may make reference to the following observations

COMANTRA E-SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. A.C.I.T.(CPC), TDS, BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 771/KOL/2022[2014-2015]Status: HeardITAT Kolkata21 Apr 2023AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 234ESection 249Section 253Section 3Section 5

Section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1963. Whenever interpretation and consideration of this expression has fallen for consideration before the Hon'ble High Courts as well as before the Hon'ble Supreme Court then, the Hon'ble Courts were unanimous in their conclusion that this expression has to be construed liberally. We may make reference to the following observations

GOUTAM CHANDRA DAS,KOLKATA vs. ITO, TDS WARD- 1(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 680/KOL/2022[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata21 Feb 2023AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

Section 200ASection 201Section 234E

condonation of delay, but ld. CIT(Appeals) did not provide such an opportunity. In his second-fold of submission, he contended that prior to 1st June, 2015, there was no provision in Section 200A to make Assessment Years: 2013-2014 to 2016-2017 Goutam Chandra Das adjustment for levying a fee under section 234E

GOUTAM CHANDRA DAS,KOLKATA vs. ITO, TDS WARD- 1(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 681/KOL/2022[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata21 Feb 2023AY 2016-2017

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

Section 200ASection 201Section 234E

condonation of delay, but ld. CIT(Appeals) did not provide such an opportunity. In his second-fold of submission, he contended that prior to 1st June, 2015, there was no provision in Section 200A to make Assessment Years: 2013-2014 to 2016-2017 Goutam Chandra Das adjustment for levying a fee under section 234E

GOUTAM CHANDRA DAS,KOLKATA vs. ITO, TDS WARD- 1(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 679/KOL/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata21 Feb 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

Section 200ASection 201Section 234E

condonation of delay, but ld. CIT(Appeals) did not provide such an opportunity. In his second-fold of submission, he contended that prior to 1st June, 2015, there was no provision in Section 200A to make Assessment Years: 2013-2014 to 2016-2017 Goutam Chandra Das adjustment for levying a fee under section 234E

GOUTAM CHANDRA DAS,KOLKATA vs. ITO, TDS WARD- 1(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 678/KOL/2022[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata21 Feb 2023AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

Section 200ASection 201Section 234E

condonation of delay, but ld. CIT(Appeals) did not provide such an opportunity. In his second-fold of submission, he contended that prior to 1st June, 2015, there was no provision in Section 200A to make Assessment Years: 2013-2014 to 2016-2017 Goutam Chandra Das adjustment for levying a fee under section 234E