M/S PREMIER IRRIGATION ADRITEC (P) LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CIR-11(1), KOLKATA , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawal

condoned. Ground No.1 & 2 – Vide Ground Nos.1 & 2, the assessee has 4. agitated the confirmation of addition of Rs.10,10,774/- made by the Assessing Officer invoking the provisions to section 43B of the Act for delay in depositing employees contribution to provident fund and employees state insurance. 5. Heard both the sides. At the outset, we note that

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, 1(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. JUPITER INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumari.T.A. No. 852/Kol/2025 Assessment Year: 2012-2013 Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax,….…Appellant Central Circle-1(4), Kolkata, Aayakar Bhawan Poorva, 110, Shanti Pally, Kolkata-700107 -Vs.- Jupiter International Limited,…………….…Respondent Unnayanam, 20A, Ashutosh Chowdhury Avenue, Kolkata-700019, West Bengal [Pan:Aaacj6956B] Appearances By: Shri Soumitra Choudhury, Advocate, Shri Pranabesh Sarkar, Advocate & Shri K.K. Chhaparia, Fca, Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri P.N. Barnwal, Cit, D.R., Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing: August 07, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order: September 30, 2025 O R D E R

delay is condoned. 3. The facts in brief are that the appellant-assessee is an importer and dealer in computer peripherals and consumables, manufacturing of CDR and DVDR. A search and seizure operation was conducted in the residential, office and factory premises of the Jupiter Group at Kolkata on 24.03.2015 and subsequent dates, lockers belonging to the various persons

DCIT, CIRCLE - 10, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. VEDA COMMERCIAL PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

Appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh, Am & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm]

condone the delay in filing of cross objections by the assessee for both the years under appeal and admit the same for adjudication. CO No. 153/Kol/2010 – Asst Year 2006-07 – Assessee CO CO No. 154/Kol/2010 – Asst Year 2007-08 – Assessee CO & CO Nos. 153 & 154/Kol/2010 Veda Commercial Pvt. Ltd., AY 2006-07 & 2007-08 3. The only issue

DCIT, CIRCLE - 10, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. VEDA COMMERCIAL PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

Appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh, Am & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm]

condone the delay in filing of cross objections by the assessee for both the years under appeal and admit the same for adjudication. CO No. 153/Kol/2010 – Asst Year 2006-07 – Assessee CO CO No. 154/Kol/2010 – Asst Year 2007-08 – Assessee CO & CO Nos. 153 & 154/Kol/2010 Veda Commercial Pvt. Ltd., AY 2006-07 & 2007-08 3. The only issue

SAIKAT CHATTERJEE,KOLKATA vs. ITO 61(1), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

condonation of delay,\nassessee points out that were pursuing a remedy\nbefore another appellate forum which ought to be\nexcluded, said averment is sufficient to invoke section\n14 of the Limitation Act or principles laid down\ntherein. Provisions of the Limitation Act dealing with\nsuits, applications and appeals apply only to Courts\nand not to Tribunal other quasi-judicial authorities

THE WEST BENGAL POWER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T.,CIRCLE-4(2), KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma

condone the delay of 52 days and admit the appeal for adjudication. 4. The first issue raised by the assessee is against the confirmation of addition of Rs.17,29,58,525/- by ld. CIT(Appeals) as made by the ld. Assessing Officer on account of difference between the liabilities as on 31.03.2006 and as on 31.03.2007 payable to the financial

THE WEST BENGAL POWER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T.,CIRCLE-4(2), KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma

condone the delay of 52 days and admit the appeal for adjudication. 4. The first issue raised by the assessee is against the confirmation of addition of Rs.17,29,58,525/- by ld. CIT(Appeals) as made by the ld. Assessing Officer on account of difference between the liabilities as on 31.03.2006 and as on 31.03.2007 payable to the financial

THE WEST BENGAL POWER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T.,CIRCLE-4(2), KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma

condone the delay of 52 days and admit the appeal for adjudication. 4. The first issue raised by the assessee is against the confirmation of addition of Rs.17,29,58,525/- by ld. CIT(Appeals) as made by the ld. Assessing Officer on account of difference between the liabilities as on 31.03.2006 and as on 31.03.2007 payable to the financial

THE WEST BENGAL POWER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T.,CIRCLE-4(2), KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma

condone the delay of 52 days and admit the appeal for adjudication. 4. The first issue raised by the assessee is against the confirmation of addition of Rs.17,29,58,525/- by ld. CIT(Appeals) as made by the ld. Assessing Officer on account of difference between the liabilities as on 31.03.2006 and as on 31.03.2007 payable to the financial

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. DECORUM INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED , HOWRAH

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: SHRI RAJESH KUMAR (Accountant Member), SHRI PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY (Judicial Member)

condone the delay of 04 days in filing the present appeal by the revenue before the Tribunal and appeal of the revenue is admitted for adjudication. 3. The revenue has raised the following grounds: - 1. That the revenue reserves its rights to substantiate, modify, DELETE, supplement and/OR alter the grounds at any time of the appeal proceedings. 2. That

PCBL LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. A.C.I.T., CIRCLE - 11(1),, KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey&Shri Sanjay Awasthi]

condoned. ITA No. 2457/Kol/2024 for AY 2018-19 3. Brief facts of the case of the assessee are that the assessee engaged in the manufacturing and sale of carbon black, sale of surplus of power generated from off- gases from carbon black manufacturing process having its factories at Durgapur, Kochi 3 I.T.A. Nos. 2456 to 2459/Kol/2024 Assessment Years

PRAMOD LAKRA, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-11(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. PHILLIPS CARBON BLACK LTD, KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey&Shri Sanjay Awasthi]

condoned. ITA No. 2457/Kol/2024 for AY 2018-19 3. Brief facts of the case of the assessee are that the assessee engaged in the manufacturing and sale of carbon black, sale of surplus of power generated from off- gases from carbon black manufacturing process having its factories at Durgapur, Kochi 3 I.T.A. Nos. 2456 to 2459/Kol/2024 Assessment Years

PRAMOD LAKRA, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 11(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. PHILLIPS CARBON BLACK LTD, KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey&Shri Sanjay Awasthi]

condoned. ITA No. 2457/Kol/2024 for AY 2018-19 3. Brief facts of the case of the assessee are that the assessee engaged in the manufacturing and sale of carbon black, sale of surplus of power generated from off- gases from carbon black manufacturing process having its factories at Durgapur, Kochi 3 I.T.A. Nos. 2456 to 2459/Kol/2024 Assessment Years

PRAMOD LAKRA,DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 11(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. PHILLIPS CARBON BLACK LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey&Shri Sanjay Awasthi]

condoned. ITA No. 2457/Kol/2024 for AY 2018-19 3. Brief facts of the case of the assessee are that the assessee engaged in the manufacturing and sale of carbon black, sale of surplus of power generated from off- gases from carbon black manufacturing process having its factories at Durgapur, Kochi 3 I.T.A. Nos. 2456 to 2459/Kol/2024 Assessment Years

PRAMOD LAKRA,DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -11(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. PHILIPS CARBON BLACK LTD , KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey&Shri Sanjay Awasthi]

condoned. ITA No. 2457/Kol/2024 for AY 2018-19 3. Brief facts of the case of the assessee are that the assessee engaged in the manufacturing and sale of carbon black, sale of surplus of power generated from off- gases from carbon black manufacturing process having its factories at Durgapur, Kochi 3 I.T.A. Nos. 2456 to 2459/Kol/2024 Assessment Years

SIKKKIM DISTILLERIES LIMITED,EAST SIKKIM vs. D.C.I.T. (TDS), GANGTOK, GANGTOK

In the result, all the 12 appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Sri Sanjay Garg & Sri Sanjay Awasthi

delay in filing the appeals is attributable to mistaken advice received by the Company, and the same is neither wilful nor deliberate. Page 2 of 8 I.T.A. Nos.: 1044 to 1055/KOL/2024 AYs: 2012-13 to 2017-18 Sikkim Distilleries Limited. I solemnly state that the contents of the condonation application as filed and this affidavit are true to the best

SIKKIM DISTILLERIES LIMITED,EAST SIKKIM vs. D.C.I.T.(TDS), CIRCLE - 5 , GANGTOK, GANGTOK

In the result, all the 12 appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Sri Sanjay Garg & Sri Sanjay Awasthi

delay in filing the appeals is attributable to mistaken advice received by the Company, and the same is neither wilful nor deliberate. Page 2 of 8 I.T.A. Nos.: 1044 to 1055/KOL/2024 AYs: 2012-13 to 2017-18 Sikkim Distilleries Limited. I solemnly state that the contents of the condonation application as filed and this affidavit are true to the best

SIKKIM DISTILLERIES LIMITED,EAST SIKKIM vs. D.C.I.T.(TDS), CIRCLE - 5, GANGTOK, GANGTOK

In the result, all the 12 appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Sri Sanjay Garg & Sri Sanjay Awasthi

delay in filing the appeals is attributable to mistaken advice received by the Company, and the same is neither wilful nor deliberate. Page 2 of 8 I.T.A. Nos.: 1044 to 1055/KOL/2024 AYs: 2012-13 to 2017-18 Sikkim Distilleries Limited. I solemnly state that the contents of the condonation application as filed and this affidavit are true to the best