BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 206Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai66Karnataka21Kolkata6Mumbai6Bangalore5

Key Topics

Section 206C10Section 20610TDS6Section 272A(2)(k)2Section 2722

ALLAHABAD BANK, NAKTALA BRANCH,KOLKATA vs. JCIT, TDS RG.57, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee, is allowed for statistical

ITA 1384/KOL/2014[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata22 Mar 2017AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri A.T.Varkey, Jm & Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1384/Kol/2014 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2010-2011) Allahabad Bank, Vs. Jcit(Tds), Range-57, 10B, Middleton Row, 8Th Floor, Naktala Branch, 364/23A, Nsc Bose Road, Kolkata-700071 Kolkata-700040 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Cala 06329 B .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Tapas Dutta, Advocate राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By : Md. Ghayas Uddin, Jcit सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 23/02/2017 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement 22/03/2017 आदेश / O R D E R Per Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Am: The Captioned Appeal Filed By The Assessee, Pertaining To Assessment Year 2010-2011, Is Directed Against The Order Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-Xvi, Kolkata, In Appeal No.138/Cit(A)-Xvi/Jcit,R-57/13-14/Kol, Dated 28.02.2014, Which In Turn Arises Out Of An Order Passed By The Jt.Commissoner Of Income Tax-Tds (Ao),U/S.272A(2)(K)/274 Of The Income Tax Act 1961, (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’), Dated 08.12.2011. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Qua The Assessee Are That The Assessee Filed Quarterly Tds Returns Late Therefore The Assessing Officer (Tds) Imposed Penalty On The Assessee U/S 272A(2)(K) Of The Act At Rs.50,336/- 3. The Captioned Appeal Is Time Barred By 32 Days. The Assessee Filed Petition For Condonation Of Delay In Filing The Said Appeal. The Assessee Explained The Reasons For Delay Stating That Assessee Is A Schedule Bank

For Appellant: Shri Tapas Dutta, AdvocateFor Respondent: Md. Ghayas Uddin, JCIT
Section 1
Section 206A
Section 249
Section 272
Section 272A(2)(k)

condoned. V. For that the Jt. Commissioner should have appreciated that there is no delay in depositing tax deducted at sources and even if in any delay interest is paid for delayed payment of such tax. VI. For that the Jt. Commissioner should have appreciated that in the Finance Act, 2005 has inserted a new clause (k) in sub section

DISTRICT LAND & LAND REFORMS OFFICER, BURDWAN,BURDWAN vs. ITO, WARD-4(2):TDS: BURDWAN, BURDWAN

ITA 617/KOL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata04 Oct 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri P.M.Jagtap, Vice- & Shri S.S.Godara

Section 206Section 206C

condone the impugned identical delay of 341 days in filing all the instant five appeal(s). These cases are therefore taken up for adjudication on merits. 3. We find that the assessee has challenged correctness of the lower authorities action raising the impugned Tax Collection at Source demands

DISTRICT LAND & LAND REFORMS OFFICER, BURDWAN,BURDWAN vs. ITO, WARD-4(2):TDS: BURDWAN, BURDWAN

ITA 618/KOL/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata04 Oct 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri P.M.Jagtap, Vice- & Shri S.S.Godara

Section 206Section 206C

condone the impugned identical delay of 341 days in filing all the instant five appeal(s). These cases are therefore taken up for adjudication on merits. 3. We find that the assessee has challenged correctness of the lower authorities action raising the impugned Tax Collection at Source demands

DISTRICT LAND & LAND REFORMS OFFICER, BURDWAN,BURDWAN vs. ITO, WARD-4(2):TDS: BURDWAN, BURDWAN

ITA 615/KOL/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata04 Oct 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri P.M.Jagtap, Vice- & Shri S.S.Godara

Section 206Section 206C

condone the impugned identical delay of 341 days in filing all the instant five appeal(s). These cases are therefore taken up for adjudication on merits. 3. We find that the assessee has challenged correctness of the lower authorities action raising the impugned Tax Collection at Source demands

DISTRICT LAND & LAND REFORMS OFFICER, BURDWAN,BURDWAN vs. ITO, WARD 4(2): TDS: BURDWAN, BURDWAN

ITA 614/KOL/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata04 Oct 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri P.M.Jagtap, Vice- & Shri S.S.Godara

Section 206Section 206C

condone the impugned identical delay of 341 days in filing all the instant five appeal(s). These cases are therefore taken up for adjudication on merits. 3. We find that the assessee has challenged correctness of the lower authorities action raising the impugned Tax Collection at Source demands

DISTRICT LAND & LAND REFORMS OFFICER, BURDWAN,BURDWAN vs. ITO, WARD-4(2):TDS: BURDWAN, BURDWAN

ITA 616/KOL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata04 Oct 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri P.M.Jagtap, Vice- & Shri S.S.Godara

Section 206Section 206C

condone the impugned identical delay of 341 days in filing all the instant five appeal(s). These cases are therefore taken up for adjudication on merits. 3. We find that the assessee has challenged correctness of the lower authorities action raising the impugned Tax Collection at Source demands