BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 200A(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Patna466Pune125Chennai106Delhi78Nagpur41Visakhapatnam29Bangalore24Cochin23Dehradun19Surat19Hyderabad16Mumbai14Jaipur12Panaji10Kolkata7Amritsar6Raipur6Rajkot5Indore5Agra4Chandigarh3Lucknow3Guwahati2Jabalpur1Jodhpur1Ahmedabad1

Key Topics

Section 234E24Section 200A9TDS7Condonation of Delay7Section 2016Section 249(2)4Deduction3Limitation/Time-bar3Section 200A(1)2

OCEAN MARINE ENVIRONMENT COATINGS PVT. LTD., ,KOLKATA vs. ITO, TDS, WARD - 2(2), KOLKATA

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 296/KOL/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 May 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Anil Kochar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vijay Kumar, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR
Section 200A(1)Section 234ESection 249(2)

section 249 provides for condonation of delay if the Ld. CIT(A) is satisfied with the sufficient cause explained by the assessee in respect of the delay. The description available with Ld. CIT(A) for condonation of delay on the basis of sufficient cause has to be dealt with reference to sec. 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. Various

OCEAN MARINE ENVIRONMENT COATINGS PVT. LTD., ,KOLKATA vs. ITO, TDS, WARD - 2(2), KOLKATA

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 295/KOL/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 May 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Anil Kochar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vijay Kumar, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR
Section 200A(1)Section 234ESection 249(2)

section 249 provides for condonation of delay if the Ld. CIT(A) is satisfied with the sufficient cause explained by the assessee in respect of the delay. The description available with Ld. CIT(A) for condonation of delay on the basis of sufficient cause has to be dealt with reference to sec. 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. Various

GRAPHITE INDIA LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. A.C.I.T., CIRCLE-11(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 618/KOL/2022[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Jan 2023AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawali.T.A. No. 618/Kol/2022 Assessment Year: 2020-2021 Graphite India Limited,.........................Appellant 31, Chowringhee Road, Kolkata-700016 [Pan: Aaacc0457C] -Vs.- Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,....Respondent Circle-11(1), Kolkata, Aayakar Bhawan, P-7, Chowringhee Square, Kolkata-700069

Section 200ASection 201Section 249(2)Section 249(3)

1 Assessment Year: 2020-2021 Graphite India Limited 2. The assessee has taken five grounds of appeal. However, its grievances revolve around two-folds. In the first fold of contention, it has pleaded that ld.CIT (Appeals) has erred in not condoning the delay of 94 days in filing the appeal before the ld. 1st Appellate Authority and on merit

GOUTAM CHANDRA DAS,KOLKATA vs. ITO, TDS WARD- 1(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 681/KOL/2022[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata21 Feb 2023AY 2016-2017

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

Section 200ASection 201Section 234E

condonation of delay, but ld. CIT(Appeals) did not provide such an opportunity. In his second-fold of submission, he contended that prior to 1st June, 2015, there was no provision in Section 200A to make Assessment Years: 2013-2014 to 2016-2017 Goutam Chandra Das adjustment for levying a fee under section 234E of the Income

GOUTAM CHANDRA DAS,KOLKATA vs. ITO, TDS WARD- 1(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 679/KOL/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata21 Feb 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

Section 200ASection 201Section 234E

condonation of delay, but ld. CIT(Appeals) did not provide such an opportunity. In his second-fold of submission, he contended that prior to 1st June, 2015, there was no provision in Section 200A to make Assessment Years: 2013-2014 to 2016-2017 Goutam Chandra Das adjustment for levying a fee under section 234E of the Income

GOUTAM CHANDRA DAS,KOLKATA vs. ITO, TDS WARD- 1(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 678/KOL/2022[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata21 Feb 2023AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

Section 200ASection 201Section 234E

condonation of delay, but ld. CIT(Appeals) did not provide such an opportunity. In his second-fold of submission, he contended that prior to 1st June, 2015, there was no provision in Section 200A to make Assessment Years: 2013-2014 to 2016-2017 Goutam Chandra Das adjustment for levying a fee under section 234E of the Income

GOUTAM CHANDRA DAS,KOLKATA vs. ITO, TDS WARD- 1(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 680/KOL/2022[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata21 Feb 2023AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

Section 200ASection 201Section 234E

condonation of delay, but ld. CIT(Appeals) did not provide such an opportunity. In his second-fold of submission, he contended that prior to 1st June, 2015, there was no provision in Section 200A to make Assessment Years: 2013-2014 to 2016-2017 Goutam Chandra Das adjustment for levying a fee under section 234E of the Income