Search: condonation of delay

5 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 194Hclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai23 Delhi16 Bangalore9 Jaipur8 Chennai7 Kolkata5 Hyderabad3 Allahabad3 Ahmedabad2 Indore2 Nagpur2 Patna2 Telangana1 Visakhapatnam1 Rajkot1 SC1 Surat1 Lucknow1 Chandigarh1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)5 Addition to Income4 Section 2503 Section 403 Limitation/Time-bar3 Condonation of Delay3 Section 69A2 Section 92C2 Disallowance

M/S. FUTURE DISTRIBUTORS,KOLKATA vs. PR.CIT, KOLKATA - 9, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 277/KOL/2016[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 Jul 2016AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

Section 131Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 263Section 40

condone the delay on the part of the assessee in filing its appeal before the Tribunal and proceed to dispose of the same on merit. 3. The relevant facts of the case giving rise to this appeal are as follows:- The assessee is a partnership firm, which carried on the business of buying, selling, trading or otherwise dealing

M/S. FUTURE DISTRIBUTORS,KOLKATA vs. PR.CIT, KOLKATA - 9, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

M/S. EPCOS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,NADIA vs. JCIT, RANGE - 11, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

M/S. FUTURE DISTRIBUTORS,KOLKATA vs. PR.CIT, KOLKATA - 9, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

M/S. EPCOS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,NADIA vs. JCIT, RANGE - 11, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD - 43(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

D.C.I.T.,CIRCLE-8(2), KOLKATA vs. M/S R.P.COMTRADE LTD., KOLKATA

D.C.I.T.,CIRCLE-8(2), KOLKATA vs. M/S R.P.COMTRADE LTD., KOLKATA