BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 156Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Kolkata4Nagpur2

Key Topics

Section 2637Section 153A3Section 41(1)2Section 143(3)2Section 682Section 143(1)(a)2Disallowance2Addition to Income2Limitation/Time-bar2

ITO, WARD - 2(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. HEIGHT INSURANCE SERVICES LTD.,, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 2163/KOL/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata22 Jan 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.2163/Kol/2017 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2009-10)

For Appellant: Shri Radhey Shyam, CITFor Respondent: Shri A.K. Tibrewal, FCA
Section 133Section 143(3)

156A, Lenin Sarani, Room-319, 3rd Floor, Kolkata-700013 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No.: AACCH 0943 G (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Radhey Shyam, CIT Respondent by : Shri A.K. Tibrewal, FCA सुनवाईक"तार"ख/ Date of Hearing : 31/10/2019 घोषणाक"तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement : 22/01/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench: The captioned appeal filed by the Revenue, pertaining

M/S. HIND BUILDERS,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD - 34(3), KOLKATA , KOLKATA

Appeal is partly allowed in above terms

ITA 442/KOL/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 Sept 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri S.S. Godara, Jm] I.T.A No. 442/Kol/2018 Assessment Year : 2010-11 M/S Hind Builders -Vs- Ito, Ward-34(3), Kolkata. [Pan: Aadfh 2807 B] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Surana, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjoy Mukherjee, Addl. CIT
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)Section 41(1)Section 68

condone the impugned delay in filing of the instant appeal as the same is neither deliberate nor intentional but attributable to some communication gap between the taxpayer and its accountant. The case is now taken up for adjudication on merits. 3. The assessee takes me to CIT(A)’s findings affirming the Assessing Officer’s action making section 68 addition

M/S KIRITIKUNJ AUTOMOBILES PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ADIT, CPC , BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands dismissed”

ITA 128/KOL/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata23 May 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice- & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)

condone the delay and proceed to decide the appeal on merit. 3. In response to the notice of hearing, no one has come present on behalf of the assessee. On earlier occasion also, we adjudicated the hearing in the absence of assessee and thereafter a letter was received by us and we re-fix the appeal for hearing. Inspite

TECHNO TRACOM PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CIR.1(2), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 205/KOL/2021[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata18 Apr 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am]

Section 153ASection 263

condone the delay in filing the appeal and admit the appeal for hearing. 3. Main grievance of the assessee is against the action of the Ld. Pr. CIT, Central-1, Kolkata to have invoked the jurisdiction u/s. 263 of the Act without satisfying the essential condition precedent stipulated u/s. 263 of the Act i.e. without validly holding the order