BOUTIQUE DE FLEUR,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD 45(2), , KOLKATA
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 446/KOL/2025[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata25 Aug 2025AY 2017-2018
Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumari.T.A. No. 446/Kol/2025 Assessment Year: 2017-2018 Boutique De Fleur,………………………………..Appellant Lawgical Consultants, 2D, Bentinck Street, Unit No. A, 3Rd Floor, Kolkata-700001 [Pan:Aajfb1035D] -Vs.- Income Tax Officer,………………………….....Respondent Ward-45(2), Kolkata, 3, Government Place (West), Kolkata-700001 Appearances By: N O N E, Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri Dheeraj, Addl. Cit, Sr. D.R., Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing: August 05, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order: August 25, 2025 O R D E R
Section 115BSection 133(6)Section 140Section 142(1)Section 249(2)Section 69A
delay is condoned.
2
Boutique De Fleur
4. The facts in brief are that during the demonetization period
(09.11.2016 to 30.12.2016), the assessee-firm deposited cash of Rs.13,18,000/- in its Kotak Mahindra Bank, Minto Park Branch.
The assessee was requested vide notice under section 142(1) of the Act dated 14.03.2018 to furnish a true and correct return
