BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

10 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 12A(1)(ab)clear

Sorted by relevance

Calcutta36Mumbai27Ahmedabad25Hyderabad20Bangalore19Pune17Delhi16Jaipur15Chennai14Cuttack14Kolkata10Visakhapatnam5Chandigarh4Indore4Agra3Raipur2Jodhpur1Surat1Nagpur1Karnataka1Lucknow1Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 12A22Exemption10Section 80G(5)(iii)9Section 12A(1)(ac)8Section 107Section 1487Limitation/Time-bar7Condonation of Delay7Section 80G

NAXALBARI VIVEKANANDA SEBA BHARATY,NAXALBARI, DARJEELING vs. CIT - EXEMPTION, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1084/KOL/2024[00]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Aug 2024

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey & Shri Rakesh Mishra & Naxalbari Vivekananda Seba Ito, Ward-1(1), Siliguri, Bharaty, 10B, Middleton Road, C/O. M/S Salarpuria, Jajodia & Kolkata - 700071 Co., 3Rd Floor, Laha Paint Vs House, 7, Chittaranjan Avenue, Kolkata - 700072 (Pan: Aadtn7438E) (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Sujay Sen, ARFor Respondent: Shri P.P. Barman, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR
Section 12A(1)(ac)

delay of 37 days is hereby condoned and the appeal is adjudicated on merits. 4. The grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are reproduced as under: 1. That on the facts and on the circumstances of the case, the order passed by the Learned CIT(E) in Form No. 10AD, rejecting the application for registration under section 12A(1

NAXALBARI VIVEKANANDA SEBA BHARATY,NAXALBARI, DARJELING vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

5
Section 143(1)5
Section 1275
Charitable Trust3

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1085/KOL/2024[00]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Aug 2024

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey & Shri Rakesh Mishra & Naxalbari Vivekananda Seba Ito, Ward-1(1), Siliguri, Bharaty, 10B, Middleton Road, C/O. M/S Salarpuria, Jajodia & Kolkata - 700071 Co., 3Rd Floor, Laha Paint Vs House, 7, Chittaranjan Avenue, Kolkata - 700072 (Pan: Aadtn7438E) (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Sujay Sen, ARFor Respondent: Shri P.P. Barman, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR
Section 12A(1)(ac)

delay of 37 days is hereby condoned and the appeal is adjudicated on merits. 4. The grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are reproduced as under: 1. That on the facts and on the circumstances of the case, the order passed by the Learned CIT(E) in Form No. 10AD, rejecting the application for registration under section 12A(1

DREAMLAND EDUCATION SOCIETY,HOOGHLY vs. ACIT, CIR-2, HOOGHLY, HOOGHLY

In the result the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 489/KOL/2016[2005-2006]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Aug 2016AY 2005-2006

Bench: Hon’Ble Sri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Dr.Arjun Lal Saini, Am] I.T.A Nos. 489-495/Kol/2016 Assessment Years : 2005-06 To 2011-12

For Appellant: Shri S.K.Tulsiyan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri G.Mallikarjuna, CIT(DR)
Section 11Section 12ASection 12A(2)Section 148Section 148(1)Section 249(4)

1) shall be 2 ITA Nos.489-495/Kol/2016 Dreamland Education Society A.Yrs.2005-06 to 2011-12 treated as if such return was a return required to be furnished under Sec 139, as prescribed in sec. 148 itself. 4) That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) acted arbitrarily in not admitting the appeal

NITDAA FOUNDATION,KOLKATA vs. CIT(E), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 667/KOL/2024[00]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Aug 2024

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishranitdaa Foundation, Commissioner Of Income Fe 261, Sector-Iii, Salt Lake, Tax (Exemption), Kolkata, Vs West Bengal -700106 10B, Middleton Row, (Pan: Aadtn2308K) West Bengal - 700071 (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: S. Banerjee, A.RFor Respondent: Amitava Sen, Addl. CIT-DR
Section 12A(1)(ac)Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)Section 80G(5)(iv)

delay may kindly be condoned and the Appeal may be heard and disposed off as there is a gross error in the order of rejection as the CIT(E) inadvertently did not consider the application for registration in Form No.10 AB under section 12A(1

SUSAMSKAR FOUNDATION ,KOLKATA vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the assessees are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1113/KOL/2023[1113]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata06 Mar 2024

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Sonjoy Sarma

Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

condone the delay and admit the appeal for adjudication 3. The assessee is in appeal before this Tribunal raising the following grounds: “1) That the impugned Order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Kolkata is arbitrary, illegal, contrary to the material on records and in excess of his jurisdiction while issuing the Order. 2) That the Rejection

OM SHANTI CHARITABLE TRUST,KOLKATA vs. AO WARD NO 1(2), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1532/KOL/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Oct 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishraassessment Year : 2019-20

For Appellant: Prakhar Dhoot, AR (online)For Respondent: Susanta Saha, Sr. DR
Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 250

delay in filing the 3 Om Shanti Charitable Trust, Kolkata AY: 2019-20 appeal is hereby condoned and the appeal is admitted for adjudication. 4. Brief facts of the case as culled out from the Statement of Facts filed before the Ld. CIT(A) are that the assessee is a Trust and had filed the return of income in which

PRANAB KANYA SANGHA,NORTH TWNETY FOUR PARGANAS vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 704/KOL/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata07 Oct 2025AY 2025-26

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubeyassessment Year: 2025-26 Pranab Kanya Sangha………….……………………….……….……….……Appellant Barasat-I, Hridaypur, West Bengal-700127.. [Pan: Aaatp4743M] Vs. Cit(Exemption), Kolkata………………………………….....……...…..…..Respondent Appearances By: Shri Ashok Mukherjee, Ar, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Sanat Kr. Raha, Cit-Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : September 17, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : October 07, 2025 Order Per Pradip Kumar Choubey: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 30.08.2024 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption), Kolkata [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Cit(E)’] Rejecting The Application Filed In Form 10Ab For Final Approval As Per The Provisions Of Section 80G(5)(Iii) Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’).

Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)Section 80G(5)(iv)

AB is a procedural in nature and not mandatory. We find reliance on the decision of the Coordinate Bench of the Tribunal passed in ITA No.1476/Kol/2025 in the case of Shri Sanatan Dharma Panchayat High School Mandawa vs. CIT (Exemption), Kolkata decided on 12.09.2025, wherein it has been held as under: “5. Upon hearing the submissions of the counsels

THE UNIVERSITY OF BURDWAN,BURDWAN vs. ACIT (EX), CIRCLE-2, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 362/KOL/2022[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata24 Nov 2022AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2018-19

For Appellant: Shri Somnath Ghosh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri G. H. Sema, CIT, DR
Section 10Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 154

condone the delay and proceed to adjudicate upon the matter. 3. Grounds raised by the assessee are reproduced as under: “1. FOR TIIAT the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-NFAC failed to appreciate that none of the conditions precedent existed and/or have been complied with and/or fulfilled by the Ld. Assistant Director of Income Tax. Centralized Processing Centre

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. UTTARAYAN TRUST FOR EDUCATION & SOCIAL WELFARE, COOCH BEHAR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 2563/KOL/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata08 Dec 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri S R Nag, ARFor Respondent: Shri Manoj Kr. Patil, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 115BSection 127Section 131Section 133ASection 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 250

delay in filing the appeal is hereby condoned and we proceed to dispose of the appeal on merits. 3. Brief facts of the case are that a Survey operation u/s 133A was conducted at the office premises of assessee-trust on 2 Uttarayan Trust For Education & Social Welfare 18.07.2019. During the course of survey proceedings u/s 133A

SRI SRI RAMAKRISHNA ASHRAMA AHMADPUR,AHMADPUR vs. THE LD. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), KOLKATA, CIT(E), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2858/KOL/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata25 Feb 2026AY 2025-26

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)(ii)Section 80G(5)(iii)

condone the delay and admit the appeal for adjudication. 2. The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal raising the following grounds of appeal: “1. That the order passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Kolkata (hereinafter referred to as Ld. CIT(E)] under section 80G(5)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, dated 28.08.2025, rejecting