INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1), KOLKATA vs. A J CAST ALLOYS PRIVATE LIMITED, HOWRAH

Appeal of the Revenue is dismissed and ground as raised\nunder Rule 27 is allowed

condone the delay and admit the appeal for adjudication.\n3. The issue raised by the Revenue is against the order of Ld.CIT(A)\npartly deleting the addition to the tune of Rs. 84,83,860/- as made by the\nAO of Rs. 89,30,379/- on account of bogus purchases. The assessee has\nalso filed petition under Rule

KARAN POLYMERS PVT LTD,KOLKATA vs. PCIT-2, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed as per the terms indicated herein above

Bench: Sri Aby T. Varkey & Sri Manish Borad)

condone the delay of the assessee and proceed to hear the case on merits. 3. The assessee is in appeal before this Tribunal raising the following grounds: “1. That the order passed by Ld. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Kolkata-2 under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 setting aside the assessment order dated 30th November, 2018 passed

M/S. JSM PROPERTIES PVT. LTD., ,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD - 1(2) , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

condone the delay of 02 days in filing this appeal and admit the appeal for adjudication on merits. 3. When the case was called for, none appeared on behalf of assessee. A perusal of file shows that the case of assessee was fixed on various occasions. It seems that the assessee is not interested to prosecute its appeal. We, therefore

DHARMIK CEMENT MERCHANTS PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD-3(3), KOLKATA

Bench: Sri Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Borad

condone the delay and admit the appeal for adjudication on merits. 3. When the case was called for, none appeared on behalf of assessee. A perusal of file shows that the assessee’s case was fixed on various occasions from 04-10-2022 onwards. It shows that the assessee is not interested to prosecute its appeal. We, therefore, deem