BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “charitable trust”+ Unexplained Cash Creditclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi157Mumbai66Chennai63Jaipur34Ahmedabad20Chandigarh18Bangalore16Pune16Cochin12Hyderabad11Allahabad10Lucknow9Amritsar8Indore8Kolkata7Agra6Nagpur4Cuttack3Raipur3Surat3Varanasi2Rajkot1Patna1

Key Topics

Section 12A16Section 689Section 143(3)4Section 133A4Unexplained Cash Credit4Addition to Income4Section 1313Disallowance3Exemption3Survey u/s 133A

SHREE AUTOMOTIVE PRIVATE LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR-10. , KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee for AY 2012-13 is allowed and appeal for AY 2013-14 is partly allowed

ITA 183/KOL/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata25 Jul 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri S. K. Tulsiyan, Advocate&Ms. PujaFor Respondent: Shri P. P. Barman, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 40A(2)Section 68

credit u/s 68 of the Act on the specious ground of unexplained share application money with premium received during the relevant previous year in spite of the fact that the Ld. A.O. in his subsequent remand report submitted to the then Ld. CIT(A) after scrutiny of the documents, audited accounts etc. had mostly accepted the source of the fund

3
Section 2502
Section 40A(2)2

SHREE AUTOMOTIVE PRIVATE LTD. ,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee for AY 2012-13 is allowed and appeal for AY 2013-14 is partly allowed

ITA 182/KOL/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata25 Jul 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri S. K. Tulsiyan, Advocate&Ms. PujaFor Respondent: Shri P. P. Barman, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 40A(2)Section 68

credit u/s 68 of the Act on the specious ground of unexplained share application money with premium received during the relevant previous year in spite of the fact that the Ld. A.O. in his subsequent remand report submitted to the then Ld. CIT(A) after scrutiny of the documents, audited accounts etc. had mostly accepted the source of the fund

SUPER IRON FOUNDRY,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CIR. 36, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of assessee allowed

ITA 270/KOL/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata11 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav(Kz)& Shri Rajesh Kumar]

Section 131Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 68

credit along with interest of Rs.21,87,350/- which was replied by the assessee vide letter dated 20.12.2016. Finally, the AO rejected the contentions of the assessee and added Rs.5,23,50,000/- u/s. 68 of the Act along with interest expenses of Rs.21,27,350/- to the income of the assessee in the assessment framed

BRAJESWARI RADHARAMAN INTERGENERATIONS HUMANITARIAN TRUST.,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD-1(2), EXEMPTION, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1313/KOL/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata21 Mar 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Girish Agrawal]

Section 11(6)Section 12ASection 143(2)Section 2(15)Section 80G

cash credit. The ld. AO further noticed that the assessee had debited depreciation amounting to Rs. 52,70,543/- from the income and expenditure accountant. The ld. AO viewed that as per section 11(6) of the Act provides that depreciation shall not be allowed while computing the income subject to application against those assets which have been treated

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. UTTARAYAN TRUST FOR EDUCATION SOCIAL WELFARE, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1915/KOL/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Dec 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rajesh Kumar]

Section 11Section 12ASection 133ASection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 68

credit u/s 68 of the Act and added the same to income to the assessee besides making the additions towards cash and capital investments thereby assessing the income at Rs. 1,79,39,440/- in the assessment framed u/s 143(3) of the Act dated 23.03.2022. 6. During the appellate proceedings, the appeal was allowed

NAV NIRMAN KOSH,KOLKATA vs. CIT(EXEMPTION) KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 7/KOL/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Feb 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: "ी जे. सुधाकर रे"डी, लेखा सद"य एवं/And "ी ऐ. ट". वक", "यायीक सद"य) [Before Shri J. Sudhakar Reddy, Am & Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

Section 12ASection 133A

credited in our bank accounts after which an exemption u/s. 35(1)(ii) of the I.T.Act, 1961 which qualifies him/her to claim one and three fourth of the said donation as tax exempt u/s. 35(1)(ii) of the I. T. Act, 1961.” 5. As stated above and armed with the aforesaid sworn statement of Shri Swapan Ranjan Dasgupta

M/S. MITRA PARISHAD,KOLKATA vs. CIT (EXEMPTIONS), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 2434/KOL/2016[-------]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata06 Sept 2017

Bench: "ी ऐ. ट". वक", "यायीक सद"य एवं/And "ी एम .बालागणेश, लेखा सद"य) [Before Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Shri M. Balaganesh, Am]

Section 12ASection 133ASection 80G(5)(vi)

credited in our bank accounts after which an exemption u/s. 35(1)(ii) of the I.T.Act, 1961 which qualifies him/her to claim one and three fourth of the said donation as tax exempt u/s. 35(1)(ii) of the I. T. Act, 1961.” 5 Mitra Parishad, AY -- 5. As stated above and armed with the aforesaid sworn statement of Shri